Death Penalty Debate Analysis

Improved Essays
James Williams
Dr. Wenneker
ENGWR 300
1 March 2018

Death Penalty, Right or Wrong? Do bad people deserve to die? This question has and still is being debated ever since humans beings discovered the power of thinking for ourselves in a logical manner. In today’s society, most people feel that they must maintain the appearance of what society considers acceptable when in public. When in public, a person may be asked a very important question that reflects their mannerisms. When in the presence of strangers they will usually give what today is called the most politically correct answer. However while discussing in a situation that does not insist on the judgement of others their answer might be different or perhaps the opposing side of the answer that was given. One of these situational debating questions is about the death
…show more content…
Adrianne Haslet Davis, author of the article “Why the Death Penalty Must Live,” (Davis “Why the Death Penalty Should Live”) is a survivor of the Boston Bombing. Because of this act of terrorism she lost her legs and her life was changed forever. She writes that because she experienced that tragedy she has become a huge advocate of the death penalty. She writes, “ Many in the survivor community feel like the death penalty offers a sense of justice being done.” It was because she was a victim and lost loved ones to that horrible act of terrorism that she is now not only for the death penalty but is a publicly speaking and trying to convince others that the death penalty does befit justice. Adrianne gives hope by writing, “I hope that the death penalty in this case sets as a precedent, and I hope that it’s a deterrent.” (Davis “Why the Death Penalty Should Live”) by stating this Adrianne is conveying that the death penalty will hopefully instill fear for future criminals to steer them away from the horrible crime of taking a life of an innocent

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In What Do Murderers Deserve? David Gelernter explores the idea of the death penalty, and its acceptable uses. He does this by providing complex ideas, analogies, and examples, allowing his numerous evidence to actually prove his point. His writing style is eloquent and slightly inflammatory, as he tries to inspire support to an issue that is often pushed to the periphery of other discussions.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article "Capital punishment’s slow death," George F. Will claims capital punishment is unjust. The death penalty is becoming used less over time, but Americans are still divided over whether it should be abolished or not. The movement created about capital punishment has split into liberals being against it and conservatives for it. This article is able to give insight into both sides, as George Will is a conservative who is against the death penalty.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrianne Haslet-Davis writes such a vivid recognition of enforcing the death penalty by the use of deterrence. She focuses on an individual story, hers being coming close to death. She goes on and on about if any individuals was murdered the life of the murderer should be also. The community tends to always use punishments to put down criminals from their cruel and heinous actions. However, with our crime rates so high, it's plain up simple that the smartest punishment for any murderer should be execution.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “The Death Penalty: Is it Ever Justified”, the longtime democratic and former mayor of New York Edward Koch refutes the idea that death penalty should be removed due to the possibility of an innocent suspect. To counter, Koch explains that states, “Human life deserves special protection, and one of the best ways to guarantee protection is to assure that convicted murderers do not kill again”. He goes on by adding that administering the death penalty is the only guaranteed solution. While killing these people does assure they will not commit murder again, the idea that an innocent citizen could be wrongly accused and receive the death penalty is an abhorrent thought. Once a citizen is executed, if more information is discovered…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Death Penalty: Inhumane or Necessary Deterrent?” written by Euan McKirdy, several concepts surrounding the death penalty are discussed. McKirdy is a Digital News Producer who joined CNN in early 2014 and covers everything from politics, tech and the environment to sport and the arts. Before McKirdy started writing for CNN he wrote for a different publications and websites including Time, the BBC, the Wall Street Journal and Monocle. Throughout the article, McKirdy displays information for both sides of the controversial argument. He writes: Advocates say it is a powerful deterrent against serious crime, while others point to the problems -- and cost -- of keeping violent offenders in general prison populations.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty today is perceived by many as an inhumane way of receiving punishment. A critic will not only argue the simple fact that the death penalty is a violation of one’s constitutional rights and only targeted for a particular social group, but also intended to affect innocent people. The death penalty doesn’t have to be the way it’s perceived to be today, for if it is dealt with accordingly, the benefits will outweigh the negative and would help the United States in the foreseeing future. That being said, instead of worrying about the damage the death penalty may cause, one should take into consideration the reasoning behind maintaining and implementing new procedures that would further enforce the penalty nationwide. Convicts…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate with the motion “Abolish the Death Penalty”, Diann Rust-Tierney argues that the death penalty is an insecure and hurtful policy that does not help advance public safety. Diann claims that the death penalty is not giving the public any safety nor does it decrease violence. Arguing that it is a waste of taxpayer money that could be used to improve law enforcement training. She later argues that the death penalty is an outdated system that is bias towards race and color, claiming that black men are less likely to be sentenced to death even though they are most likely to be victims of homicide. Diann ends her argument with a humanitarian statement that we as humans have the ability to change our way of life and we should not have to take…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment, is it an act of inhumanism or the perfect amount of justice for victims of even more server inhuman crimes? Capital punishment has been stated to be a controversy dating back to the eighteenth century when it began. Even though capital punishment is considered to be inhuman by society and various government officials it is not unconstitutional and does not violate the eighth amendment which states “excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Excessive bail would be the act of the jury setting an outlandish amount for the bail of a criminal , if a person commits a heinous crime such as murder,federal murder,large scale drug trafficking,treason, terrorism,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A former Cincinnati resident was ordering his last meal before execution in prison when the governor reversed his sentence because the DNA on his shoes did not match the blood of the victim. A Cleveland man was freed from his death sentence after serving forty years when a witness confessed to lying during the trial about seeing the murder. A man from Akron was spared from execution after officials confirmed that he was mentally disabled and contained the mind of a second-grader. (Johnson and Wagner, 2015) Capital punishments consist of being sentenced to civil death or execution.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word “death” is adept at sending a cold, frightening shiver down the spine of any human. It is a major fear factor that has been lurking around the corner since the beginning of time, for governments have been using death to their advantage to threaten and bend people to their own will since the eighteenth century B.C. The threat towards one life for not adhering to government laws is called capital punishment, and it is still very much active in present day society. In fact, the death penalty has been in America since the colonial times, 31 US states still use capital punishment, and there has been numerous controversies surrounding the death penalty on whether it is being disproportionately subjected onto minority groups. Capital punishment was an idea brought to America by British and other European explorers.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s Time to Kill the Death Penalty America is the home of the free, the brave and apparently the vindictive if our embrace of capital punishment is any indication of our national character. We tout our love of human rights for all the world to see yet we imprison more people than China or Russia. We still execute people when according to Amnesty International nearly two-thirds of countries around the world have abolished the practice. America cannot be that city on the hill that history tells us we should be when our government is killing people under the guise of justice. America, it is time to kill the death penalty once and for all as it is does not deter crime, it is expensive in terms of the monetary cost to tax payers, and more importantly,…

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays