Why Is Socrates A Moral Evil

Improved Essays
[Jinique Segnor]
[Mr. LaMendola]
[phil]
[9/20/2017] Socrates definitely approached the matter in a moral way and in my opinion, was the truthful and correct course of action. Moral virtue is more upstanding and saved him from that of one's ignorance. He convinced the jury to understand his view and thoughts. Socrates being certain he did nothing intentionally or of wrong should make you realize he wouldn’t wrong himself as to appealing to the court and asking not of the consequence he wanted to pay but of what he only deserved. It certain that Socrates had respect for the law. His argument is that death in his eyes shall not be feared. "The hour of departure has arrived, and we go our way, I to die and you to live" (Apology). Why would

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    We can empathise with our protagonist, and would likely respond in the same manner if put in the same situation. However, Socrates is not an ordinary man. By giving up on trying to convince his…

    • 2199 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In allowing himself to be executed, Socrates would be allowing his unfair trial to be validated. He also plays to his duties as a father, stating that “if [he] go[s] off when [he] could be educating them… they’ll meet the same fate which usually befalls orphans once they’ve lost their parents” (Cahn 507). He tries to convince Socrates that he is choosing the easier path, and not finishing the education of his…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates makes a statement that if the jury kills him it will not be easy to find another like him. However once he is sentenced to death he states there will be more accusers after he is gone. Is he not contradicting himself? Was he trying to spare his life even though he claimed to not fear death? Another statement that leaves me with questions is, in the beginning of Socrates speech he says that his friend asked an oracle if there is anyone wiser than Socrates.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Socrates speech Apology, Socrates defends himself against the jury claiming that he is an innocent man and has done no wrong. In the end Socrates is found guilty and will be sentenced to death. Socrates friend Citro has the money to get him out of prison but Socrates refused to take the opportunity and because of this he dies. I have a reason to believe that Socrates was wrong…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With his reasoning and arguments, Socrates decides to not obey the Laws of the state and proceeds with his verdict. Socrates knows that he did not truly commit a crime or disobey with the laws, but he did not want to commit an unjust action as well. Although one may not agree with the ideas and beliefs of a state, that…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas, proceedings and ultimate judgement had a political hand all stemming from Socrates criticism to the political class, poets, and craftsmen through his philosophical engagements. Socrates was found guilty with a narrow margin, but his proposal for penalty added insult to injury. He also rejected prison and exile, offering perhaps instead to pay a fine. The judge rejected his suggestion and sentenced him to death and with a philosophical statement, Socrates accepted the judgement saying that only the gods know what happens after death and so it would be foolish to fear what one does not know. Further, is there a true measure of guilt or innocence in Socrates’ case?…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also accepts his fate stating that, “it is not difficult, O Athenians! to escape death… it is much more difficult to avoid depravity.” All of his life Socrates taught philosophy and forward thinking, and if he had gone back and begged for a fine or for jail he would’ve thrown away everything he had taught to his students and everything his life had supposedly stood for which is to be moral just and virtuous. Socrates goes on to say that the judges should punish his sons and pain them as he had pained them if they were to exhibit signs of depravity by holding things like money before virtue.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates continues to explain how he can’t violate the verdict, which in this case is the death penalty therefore, it would be wrong because Socrates couldn’t go against his principles. Socrates states, “ Come then, if we destroy that which becomes better by the healthful and is corrupted by the distasteful, because we don’t obey the opinion of the experts, is life worth living for us when it has been corrupted? Surely this is the body, isn’t it?”(47e) Socrates is explaining how in his mind life is not worth living unless it is lived appropriately in this case being, that the ethical life is more important than life itself. Socrates continues his justification on why he can’t escape prison because by committing this action he would be doing what he considers as the unjust thing because he would’ve been seen as a dishonorable…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay is about Socrates in the Apology. Socrates was a philosopher, a religious fanatic and a man of reason who lived to questioned why things are the way they are, due to his occupation of questioning and reasoning he was later brought to court on charges of corrupting the young and encouraging people not to believe in godly things that are recognized by the state as said by his accusers. During his trial he said quite a numerous things in the Apology and he was found guilty by the juries and was sentenced to death. So, in this essay I will be explaining why he thinks that death should not be always avoided during his trial on apology. And I will be explaining my position regarding what Socrates has said that we shouldn’t always avoid…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps Socrates realized the courts were right in his sentence because he was not truly wise and had in fact corrupted the minds of the youth. Or, maybe he knew that if he was to be acquitted of the charges he would continue his teachings and probably end up back in jail, and would rather not waste the time and effort. Or, maybe Socrates’ love of Athens and the respect he had for the government and the courts decision stopped him from fleeing his death…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates didn’t care about what others thought or said, he believed what he was doing was right and no one was going to change that. His morals and values were strong, which helped him sustain his duty as a citizen, and even if this would hurt him in the end he would die a hero for sticking beside the law and completing his…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Plato’s Apology, Socrates is put on trial for accusations of disruptive behavior. Some men in the community feel that his way of life goes against the will of the Gods and corrupts the youth. As he stands before a jury that will ultimately decide his fate, Socrates states that “the difficulty… is not in avoiding death, but in avoiding the unrighteousness” (Plato 38). Socrates knows that death is inevitable, and repeatedly claims he does not fear it. He believes that it is harder to run from the injustices and evils of the world than it is from death, so he defends his philosophy even after execution becomes the verdict.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone had told him then he would have known better not have done it. Socrates also believes that without him the entire city will turn ignorant and will never know what true wisdom is and tells the court that he is helping the people of this city by keeping their minds active. When the jury decides that Socrates was indeed guilty they let him choose his punishment of being exiled or going to prison. Socrates said that he did not want to be exiled because Athens was his home and he did not want to leave his home, he wanted to stay there and help the society. He chose the punishment of being fed by the government…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays