Socrates Champion Of Justice Analysis

Improved Essays
Socrates left us no written record of his thought or life. Our primary source of information about him are Plato’s works. From what we can learn about Socrates from the famous dialogues created by Plato, who, in turn, was an outstanding student of Socrates, it seems obvious that he offers a philosophy that is genuinely progressive and radical in its wish to reform the society of the day. Apparently, Socrates’s ideas made him a controversial figure. Many people believe that Socrates could be inconsistent in some of his statements. The philosopher claims that "the champion of justice" should not be engaged in political activities. At the same time, Socrates is said to have preached politics and to some extent have been engaged in it. An inexperienced …show more content…
Indeed, it is. In court Socrates tells the jury about his motivation in search of the truth about wisdom. “I am that gadfly which God has attached to the state, and all day long …arousing and persuading and reproaching…You will not easily find another like me” (------). Socrates emphasizes that by looking for the truth he wanted to do good to Athens. He claims that he has never participated in politics on purpose. (" The only office of state which I ever held of was that of senator; tribe Antiochis"). Socrates also reports to the court that he always did what seemed to him to be right. (”But I have been always the same in all my actions, public as well as private, and never have I yielded any base compliance to those who are slanderously termed my disciples or to any other”). He is willing to do what he believes is right rather than be persuaded by fear of exile to do what he believes to be wrong. Socrates final remarks find him urging the "gentlemen of the jury" to "fix [their] minds on one belief, which is certain -- that nothing can harm a good man either in life or after death, and his fortunes are not a matter of indifference to the gods." (41d, the Apology). To put it differently, Socrates says that he remains faithful to the idea of the search of the truth for the benefit of Athens until the very end. Is not he a "champion of justice"

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Caroline Machado Ethical Dimensions 31/8/2015 Ancient Greece: Socrates and Plato Socrates was a Greek philosopher born in Athens in the year 469 B.C who did not know how to read or write himself. So, all we know about him comes from Plato. Socrates was known as the wisest men in Athens, but he wanted to find someone as smart as him. He wanted to define the meaning of good, beauty and virtue.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was a job less philosopher whose only form of income was what little donations received from others he met. Socrates walked around and spread knowledge and philosophy to others. Many people did not like Socrates because he would play the devil’s advocate whenever he talked with someone on the streets, he questioned everyone and always took the opposite side of others beliefs. This did not benefit Socrates in the courtroom. In section 20 C one of the jurors asked: “But Socrates, what is your occupation?”…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now, this could also be seen as simply arrogant on behalf of Socrates, but he lives his life by proving that philosophers know nothing and that they understand that concept. On the other hand, normal towns folk do not, thus separating philosophical and political justice further. It must be noted that the reason for hate manifesting on behalf of Socrates, is because he challenges the authority of the individuals who have power over the entire population. These officials do not like when their power is challenged, mainly because it can cause disorder and deterioration within a…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates attaches virtue, good, and morality to justice in a way to make it seem like it is good for its own sake. The entire Republic is made to reason why justice is good for its own sake—that there is something intrinsically good about it. Within book I of the Republic, Socrates and Thrasymachus have come to an agreement that there are certain virtues that allow things to work well for the better, a vice being the opposite and causing anything to make something preform for the worse. In the end of book I’s dialogue, both Socrates and Thrasymachus have some to agree that justice is allows a person to be more profitable and live well (Plato, 353c-354b). This is important in the foundation of the Republic.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ideal of trial by jury has been used to condemn people or free people for many years. By being tried by peers they are able to analyze the facts presented in the case and make a decision on what actions should be taken. Both Socrates, and Johnnie Cochran portray similar traits based of The Apology and the series The People vs. OJ Simpson . Socrates was put on trial and sentenced to death. Johnnie Cochran was not directly put on trial put was representing a cause and a friend in a trial.…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of Socrates progressive ideas was that he was not materialistic and did not lust after money or power. Socrates boldly claims “in my investigation of the service of the god I found that those who had the highest reputation were nearly the most deficient, were nearly the most deficient, while those who thought to be inferior were more knowledgeable” (25). This brazen quote rejects the common notion that those of wealth and prestige who hold the power of Athens are the ones who are superior in knowledge. Socrates, in his search for truth, compares the politicians to craftsmen in this quote. For when he investigated the claim that he is the wisest, Socrates compared the lowly craftsman to the powerful politician and found that the craftsman were wiser than those who held power.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Starting The Republic, Book I, Socrates goes down to Piraeus (Plato 327a, p1). He is stopped by Polemarchus and begins the debate on what justice is with Cephalus (329a, p3). Cephalus explains his view of justice which Socrates shows is incorrect. Polemarchus, then, picks up where his father left off and looks to explain what justice is. However, unlike his father, Polemarchus explains justice as “friends owe something good to their friends, never something bad” (Plato, 332 a10, p6).…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates is an avid supporter of self-knowledge, of better understanding yourself and your nature. From this better understanding of self comes an increased knowledge of right and wrong. Socrates’ main concern is acting justly and ethically. Knowledge of what is just and ethical comes from constantly…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Socrates guilty as charged?" Socrates, an ancient Greek philosopher, is linked with Western systems of logic and philosophy. At an early age, he served in the hoplite-ancient Greek infantry, and later devoted his life to philosophy. His rather unique perspective and wisdom in philosophy attracted friends and enemies at the same time. Socrates metaphorically was the gadfly that stung the horse- Athenian state.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was an incredibly talented Greek philosopher from the city-state of Athens. He was regarded as the wisest man in all of Greece for his time. It is even said that he was told at a very young age by a great oracle that he would be the wisest man. However, his profound and unorthodox teachings wound up landing him in trouble with the Athenian government. Socrates was tried for corrupting the minds of the youth.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Is Guilty Essay

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    But, there are others who believe he is innocent; for example, me and my fellow Socratics. Our Faction feels he is solely being used as an example. This assembly is passing judgment on one of the wisest citizen of all Athens. Socrates does not communicate values and ideas: he merely asks questions to his followers and begs that his speakers teach him.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice to the Jury In the Apology, Plato characterizes Socrates to be wise and concerning for men’s souls. Throughout the defense Socrates claims that the jurors can kill him, but they cannot harm him. He believes that if they jurors convict him, they would be harming themselves because they are tainting their souls by ignoring the truth. Socrates’ arguments for these claims are cogent because Socrates centers his arguments on the fact that truth and justice is not truly defined and that man must constantly reflect upon his thoughts to clearly define these qualities.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I don’t think Socrates deserved to die and had I had a vote I would’ve voted for acquittal. The reason to this is as far as I can see his trial and conviction occurred because he was a person who spoke out against the majority. His opinions on life and values were similar to those of some members of Athens, but overall they were direct oppositions to the governments standings. Unfortunately, because some of the like-minded students of Socrates adapted his teachings to fit their plans the resulting negative occurrences, such as the thirty tyrants, were blamed on him. The resulting blame and distrust from the Athenians brought him to trial.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wanted to know what justice was, but he never gave his definition, instead he asked others and counter attacked this became known as the Socratic method. The Socratic method is more of investigation, and discovery, until you find the right definition. Socrates interest was to find answers and gain knowledge. In the Socratic method you can mold your answer and change perspective you’re always open to new ideas. Also from The Apology we know Socrates didn’t “charged fees” to share his knowledge.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘The Apology’ written by Socrates most famous student Plato, is a Socrates dialogue where he is defending himself from the accusations of corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods of Athens. He tells the court that these accusations are false and he does believe in the gods of Athens. He also tells them that he did not corrupt the youth, in fact the youth followed him on their own free will. According to Socrates the problem was that people who called themselves wise were not actually very wise, their knowledge was based on ignorance thinking that they were wise and he wanted to help them see that true knowledge was knowing nothing rather than believing that they know everything. As philosophy is based on questioning everything,…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays