Rome was hilly and had very good soil. Greece did not, Greece was mountainous and had bad soil. Greece and Rome also relied on different water sources. Greece got their water from the Mediterranean and Rome got water from the Tiber River. These two places also had different locations.…
Paragraph one intro: Hook: Background: Both the roman and Athenian empires were powerful. They were also stricter in some areas more than others such as their systems of citizenships and the rights and the responsibility that came along with it. Thesis: The Romans had a better system of citizenship than Athens, because of the ability to move up in social class, they allowed more people to become citizens, and they had a better system of government. Paragraph 2 body: Topic sentence: The Romans had a better system of citizenship because they allowed people to move up in social class.…
The Roman Empire was one of the greatest civilizations in history, developing advancements in many important areas, like architecture and technology. Its culture was widespread, and it had a big impact on other civilizations to come. The main way Rome was able to become so advanced was being able to adapt to its geography. This allowed them to complete tasks more efficiently, and maximize the effectiveness of what they were doing.…
As Rome expanded they built a stronger government. Their government at the empires early stages was more of a democracy where the citizens elected officials. After the Roman Empire expanded more, the idea of…
Rome and the United States are kind of the same. The only differences are the Romans executed most of their prisoners. The United States does not execute most of their prisoners, only maybe one to ten a year. There are a lot of similarities though. The United States and Ancient Rome both are open to newcomers, open to all religions, both have three branches of government, and they both have burial services.…
Sparta was a military based civilization, while Athens was more focused on the effect of public speaking meaning that Sparta had more focus on military and army purposes. Sparta was a better model of civilization than Athens because the army was much stronger , women had more rights during that time period and the government is more stable.…
Rome was prosperous because of the land they had. The United States had a reinforced government, which meant it was very strong, and there was a lot of people in the government. The United States used democracy as their form…
Ancient Rome was a massive empire. They were influenced by other cultures such as the Etruscans and the Greeks. The Romans also conquered many other civilizations, but did they meet the common good? To meet the common good Rome had to do several things. Moreover, they had to protect rights, prepare for the common defense, and of equal importance, they had to provide public services.…
Have you ever wondered why the Roman Empire was so successful? If so, then the subject will no longer be a mystery for you! The success of Rome can be compounded into three main reasons; strong leadership, the way roman leaders handled conquered countries, and she allowed the conquered peoples to keep the majority of their customs. So how was roman leadership, strong?…
The Ancient Romans made their cities very compact. They did not like to waste space. Their buildings were very sturdy and they were known for having a very well built sewer system. They also had many public bathing stations throughout Rome. Rome…
There are differences in their government, military, and infrastructure. True they both have a senate, but Rome has an Emperor, who rules for life with absolute power, as opposed to the US, which has an elected president who is only a representative, not a ruler. The difference in the militaries is that Rome’s military was always on the move, conquering adjacent countries for resources and land, while the US military only protects our country from enemy countries, because we make alliances with other countries. Another main difference is that here in the US we have advanced, protected infrastructure, such as our source of water, which is underground pipes that carry water from place to place, the Romans had above-ground aqueducts that were supported by arches, which anybody could come destroy and ruin the whole…
Rome had more rights because they created more and could change them when they wanted to. Rome also more freely gave away citizenship. They have more rights because they had limited rights , could own property, but could not vote or hold public office. They let their people do more.…
Second Rome gave women a right to be citizen also new born babies , but they had limited rules. Lastly Roman Senate was way more calm and mature and organized the Athenian Assembly was super rude, noisy and unorganized they was so busy talking among them self that they couldn't hear the announcer couldn't even say why they're even there because it so loud. This is my opinion why Rome is way better Athens. (Doc A, B, ,D, E and F…
Certainly it is a challenging quote. For me it immediately raises a barrier. It connects because it poses such a challenge and the quote itself conjures up images of people interfering with my life, way of thinking, and ways I deal with matters. Then of course there’s the other side of the coin the government makes laws to regulate life, for peace and order, and to protect the vulnerable. But it is not enough that there are two sides of the coin in fact there are numerous sublayers to this quote.…
Both the ancient civilizations of Rome and Egypt have different characteristic that make their countries the most powerful of their time. Egypt although in a desert used the Nile River to grow bigger and Rome used the warm Mediterranean weather and the Italian peninsula to grow bigger too. These characteristics can be in how they lived their life or how they flourished in their different landscape. I learned that both Egypt and Rome worked with each other even after the Romans took control of Egypt. Their interactions were both helpful and negative.…