Why Is Representative Democracy Better Than Fascism

Improved Essays
Representative democracy is more effective for maintaining society than fascism because in a representative democracy the people are represented through their elected officials while in a fascist rule it is more focused on authoritarian rule where people have to be obedient to the ruler, where people don’t really get as much participation in the politics and making of the policies as a representative democracy. Also people have been historically to respond better to a democratic government where they feel like they have a voice rather than in a fascist government where the only option is to agree with what the government proposes.

Representative democracy is more beneficial for a country because of the systems that are incorporated within, for example it allows for all citizens that qualify to vote to voice their opinions and have the chance to elect a representative that they think agrees with them on the same issues. On the other hand fascism is mainly
…show more content…
These representatives are held accountable by their constituents for anything they might do while in position where they will be limited on certain powers by a supreme law, a constitution. In this type of government there is also different branches mainly created as checks and balances to each other. Although fascism has a constitution the dictator can write whatever he/she wants. Another aspect that makes representative democracy better than fascism is that it promotes individual freedom and respects personhood. It respects that humans have free will and they can perform actions and peruse interests that don’t lend themselves to the immediate benefit of the state. Where as in fascism the government promotes violence as a necessary tool of class struggle so that the poor people want to kill all the rich people, and they make this violence heroic and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To better understand, think of democracy as a group of friends that vote on where to go eat. There will always be that one friend who has more influence than the rest in which they hold all of the cards and choices. Once the others have voted and determined where they want to eat, the “superior” person keeps any arguments out of control by giving other offers. So essentially they all have a vote, but are heavily influenced by the “superior” people, in this case the dominant…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His emphasis of collectivism, rising people’s ethical values, and awareness of others rather than their own suffrage. Fascism was also encouraged violence rather than being a coward, a pacifist in the face of war. Thus, recognizing how dangerous can an authoritative ideological governmental system can be without limitations can bring great analysis through the lens of the historian to compare ideological system identifying flaws between each…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How effectively does representative democracy operate in the UK Democracy in the UK has many operative strengths claimed on its behalf. Proposed legislation in the UK can be processed through parliament very quickly due to no separation of powers, this is because there is a majority in the house of commons of the winning party members who can get their party whips to convince others to vote in a certain way in their favour. In 2001 when the Labour party had a majority in parliament of 165 seats, bills were passed more efficiently as almost the entire party voted for each legislation passed by the Labour party making the country in what Lord Hailsham would call an elective dictatorship. Another example is Liberal Democracy, which is a type of representative democracy where there is an emphasis on the protection of individual rights and liberties, where the rule of law is…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After World War One, there were many types of new government that emerged from the chaos of the war. But, the two major governments were dictatorships and democracies. In Germany, Italy and Russia, the dictators Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Josef Stalin came to power after the fall of democracy in each country. There were many reasons for the change to dictatorship, including inflation, unemployment and a lost sense of trust in democracy. These dictatorships ruled for many years during the interwar period.…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This essay will prove that nationalists take advantage of violent situations, and exploit their power from these lethal environments. The opportunistic…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Narcotics In Colombia

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This ideology is linked to Marxist values, as it is based upon the belief that the working class should be the ruling class of the country (Dictatorship of the proletariat, 2016). Once again, the FARC use the ideology of proletariat dictatorships to justify their actions. Since they believe that the working class deserves more power, they retract influence from the wealthy by taxing them and reducing their funding. Some criticize the extortion that the guerrillas use for funding, yet they continue to strive for a country in which the poor are able to survive and exert control over their surroundings more effectively. As with Marxism, the ideology of proletariat dictatorships is interrelated with the economy.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Propaganda is misleading information used to promote a certain point of view. Propaganda is used in a lot of different ways. Propaganda aims to your emotions rather than how you would feel when you think clearly. I believe propaganda has a beneficial effect on our society because it keeps the world up to date on the newest fads and situations. Persuading techniques are shown to have you act and feel different than you should.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A comparison of the Athenian and Roman governments demonstrates that the Athenian Limited democracy is the more effective type of government because citizens have more of a say in government, the Roman Republic has many risky outlets for greediness for power, and the Romans had no way of dealing with oppositional factions. Citizens had more say in government. They were able to be in the Athenian Assembly, which held power like making laws, passing laws, conducting political trials, and electing government officials. Even the poorest citizens had equal opportunities and this is very important because people can express their opinions clearly by proposing laws on their own. All citizens, which was limited to natural born males complete with…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Authoritarian government is very different than a Democracy for many reasons, but I will describe two. The democracy has an election to tell who is the leader and in an authoritarian they are forced into it. Also, the authoritarian government has unlimited power over their people and democracy has a certain amount of power they can have. These are just a couple of ways they are different.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Representative Democracy

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. If I was talking to exchange students about American Government, I would tell them that our government is a Representative Democracy. A representative democracy is when you elect representatives to vote on our behalf. We don’t vote directly on laws and policies, nut we vote for representatives to represent are best interest. That is why it is important to vote for trustworthy representatives that will vote in a way where the safety and needs of the people are met.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Representative Democracy

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is it fair for a state with a population of only 500,000 to have more voting power over a state with a population of over 37 million? That is the reality in the United States. The constitution and political system in the U.S have many aspects that are both democratic and non-democratic. Democratic can be defined as “favoring or characterized by social equality; egalitarian” or in other words, fair; whereas undemocratic can be defined as the opposite (“democratic”). When considering the system of a representative democracy, the electoral college, the Supreme Court and the Constitution itself, it is evident that even though they were perhaps made with the intent of somewhat equal representation, they are flawed in ways which make them undemocratic.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The similarities between Athenian and American Democracy Once a writer said, “History is not the past, but a map of the past drawn from a particular point of view to be useful to the modern traveler”(Glassie). History is a source of information that people can look up to for the modern time. History can also help to solve problems which would not be possible without it. Moreover, if people look into history there were society which created law and values that lead to the modern society. For instance, ancient Athen is one of the society which existed and it has many similarities with the U.S society.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America, the land of the free and home of the brave. Our country is so wonderful that people from all over the world long to come and live here. Our founding fathers spent years studying and forming a great government. So, which way did they go? Are we a republic, or a democracy?…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having a representative government is crucial to maintain control over our country and over every state. It can be contradicting when we see the news and how the government is handing every problem, but if we didn't have someone to make laws and control the country everything would be chaotic. There is the thought that this is a free country, and many people try to take advantage of that. Having the employment of rational legislators act as the deputies of us (the people) represent our will in the halls of government is the best thing to do in my opinion. We have check and balances that keep the three branches of government (the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches) from getting too powerful of one another.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every nation and country has a way of running itself; a way to govern what is considered lawful and unlawful. In the United States of American, there is a massive controversial debate about whether our democracy is majoritarian or if it is more pluralistic in nature. Some may argue that the mass public, or every citizen in the country, is able to control the government’s actions. Others will state that many groups are able to work together amongst themselves to be able to allow more involvement of the citizens in a majority of the nation’s decisions. Both of these ideas of how our government works are similar in ways as well as different in many other ways.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays