Why Is Natural Law Important

Improved Essays
Student ID Number:91403392

'Explain how Natural Law is important for understanding rights'
As a nation, we take the rights and freedoms we hold for granted. Daily, we make decisions without interference from the government or the monarchy. In contrast, our ancestors didn’t enjoy the freedoms and rights that we enjoy today and lived their lives under dictatorship and tyranny. However, through The Age Of Enlightenment, philosophers such as John Locke, began to question the suppressing treatment that civilians were subject to and altered the way people viewed power structures. This led to a shift in expectation of rights and freedoms. Throughout this essay, I will refer back to John Locke’s work.
Developing from The United Nations General Assembly,
…show more content…
An area of the law which was is relevant to the understanding of a right is natural law. It is useful to introduce the idea of natural law as a theory before exploring its relevance to rights.
Natural Law is a philosophical theory which teaches us that values are ‘inherent in human nature’ and universally identifiable through ‘human reason’. Through science we are aware of the ‘law
…show more content…
The first are ‘theological’ natural rights thinkers who’s views are religion-dependent. They believe that laws must be based in morality because they originate from God’s eternal law. Conversely, secular thinkers view things from a non-religious standpoint. They replace the laws of God with behavioural laws which are understood by human reason. They say that by observing nature we can organise our laws with the equivalent level of morality as theological thinkers. By observing natural behaviours we can sense of how our laws should be arranged.

As early as 1225, Thomas Aquinas, a theological natural law thinker, began to act upon Aristotle’s ideas and was seeking the answer to questions surrounding what human nature is. Akin to Aristotle, he believed that all humans have a final purpose. Aquinas explained that each person needs a
Student ID Number:91403392
'space' over which they have sole control and 'no one else may rightfully intervene'. This moral space was defined as Natural Rights.9 Aquinas taught that there are laws/precepts that are built into nature and can be understood through reason. He says that in order to reach eternal happiness the Five Primary Precepts must be exercised. These

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In essence, God decides morality, the basis of right and wrong. If God says something is right then it is morally right; if God says something is wrong then it also is morally wrong. However, flaws in this theory have caused many people to deny it and believe in Saint Thomas Aquinas Theory of Natural Law. This theory is divided into three parts: the world has values and views built into its nature, describe not only how things are but also how they ought to be, and how do we determine what is tight and wrong. The two theories are opposite in terms of viewpoint but in today's world, but of them are rejected because of conflicting issues.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Americans thought about natural rights they first thought about the Magna Carta and English Bill of Rights and the natural rights that the Britons possessed in these documents. Locke’s interpretation was much different from the Framers of the Constitution look on things. The Framers believed that the constitution was a contract between the inhabitants of America and America’s government. The concluding constitution ended up limiting the government power by protecting the natural rights of Americans inspired by John…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As noted by William, legality is a confinement of the powerful who dictate what is right and wrong in the society. Therefore, the law is not a universal threshold to ascertain the correctness of people’s actions because but its nature it has…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What the author has laid down for us so far is that, however offensive it is in the present day and age to say it, there is a common moral ground. However, just because the common moral ground exists doesn’t mean that we understand it fully, and it doesn’t mean that we always follow it, we don’t. Despite what one would expect, it is often used to defend corruption, and to justify misconduct. This common moral ground is the groundwork for natural law, together with some small allegations. While the idea of natural law may give the impression of simplicity, it is hard to face the truths of it, and far har What the author has laid down for us so far is that, however, offensive it is nowadays to say it, there is a common moral ground.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brandeis Louis and Samuel Warren in their article talked about the right to privacy, the entitlement to have full protection in person and in property is a fundamental principle for everyone. They acknowledged that the principle is unfixed, and it has been reconstructed time by time because of political, social, and economic changes. (Warren and Brandeis 193). In short, the authors illustrated the development of common law about the life and property which always meet the new standards of our society, and they also made coherent and potent arguments to explain why defamation, property and contract law failed to provide appropriate protection for privacy. 2) The Authors’ Arguments…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis Abortion

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In an article titled “Why Abortion is Immoral”, Don Marquis concludes that any action that deprives an individual of a valuable future is a serious prima facie morally wrong. Marquis argues that a fetus has a “future like ours”(FLO) of great value and killing the fetus deprives the fetus of that future. Therefore, killing a fetus is morally wrong and since abortion is killing a fetus, abortion is morally wrong. I have chosen to analyze natural law and ethical egoism as it relates to abortion. Ethical egoism agrees with abortion while, natural law does not.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Natural Law Theory

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If you’ve ever observed animals living in their natural habitat, you might see how well off they appear to be. In his Fundamentals of Ethics, Shafer-Landau brings up the idea that many theorists of Morality and Ethics believe that perhaps the key to morality is understanding our place in the natural order of things, similar to what many animals do with the exception of comprehension. This belief is laid upon the foundation of the Natural Law Theory. This theory explains that good human beings are those who fulfill their true nature; bad human beings are those who don’t. At the core of it all, it tells us that actions are right just because they are natural, and wrong just because they are unnatural.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    C.S. Lewis begins his novel Mere Christianity by discussing the Law of Human Nature and various other laws that are important to his discussion. Lewis states that people must be aware of a Law or Rule of fair play or else there would be much more quarrelling among humans. This Rule or Law used to be known as the Law of Nature; however, laws of nature today will usually refer to things such as gravitation, heredity, or the laws of chemistry (Lewis, 4). The Law of Nature, when concerning issues of right and wrong, is more correctly referred to as the Law of Human Nature today. People will argue that this Law of Nature is fraudulent because they believe that different ages have had different moralities, but Lewis claims that moral teachings throughout…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    C.S. Lewis, author of “Mere Christianity,” stands alone from many other authors of Christian literature. Instead of opinionated doctrine convoluted to nonsense, Lewis offers a logical approach to the Christian view of life. Yet, he does this without hardly mentioning Christianity itself in the whole first book. By then, however, he has already convinced me that he is right and that there can be no other God but the God of the Christian faith. Lewis does this by breaking down the moral law.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No matter how well-intended the public envisions a law to be, there are some rights that cannot be intruded upon, whether it is free exercise of religion or some right to behave in privacy that cannot be regulated by the public no matter the outcome. It is in our own language of right, which can mean either to do the most lawful action or one’s inalienable human right can come into the conflict of…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plautus 'Play Truculentus'

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1 Introduction The play Truculentus by Plautus is the oldest known source in which the word “obligare” is used, the root ‘lig’ indicates the binding of something or someone. The subject of law of obligations was introduced in Justinians Institutes by the following definition: “obligatio est iuris vinculum, quo necessitate adstringimur alicuius solvendae rei secundum nostrae civitatis iura”. This translates to the legal bond whereby an individual is constrained to perform an action according to the law of state.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dark Ghettos Essay

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Natural Law theorists argue that moral standards are based on the objective nature of the world and that legal standards derive their authority from these moral standards. Aquinas argues that law is, “Nothing else than an ordinance of reason for the common good, promulgated by him who has the care of the community.” This is very similar to Austin’s command theory, in which laws are commands by a sovereign to citizens, and commands are orders that are backed up by threats. The difference here is that the sovereign can only give orders to their citizens if they are a good person. Aquinas argues that just laws are consistent with natural law and are thus unbreakable, but unjust laws are inconsistent with natural law and are thus…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Ethics of Natural Law,” C.E. Harris explains the views of natural-law theorists. First, he states that the moral standard of natural law is that the actions that promote the values that follow the natural inclinations of human beings are right. These values include life, procreation, knowledge, and sociability. Anything, such as murder, birth control, stifling intellectual curiosity, or spreading lies, that opposes these four natural inclinations is wrong. Then, Harris notes that natural-law theory is absolutist, explaining that no values specified by natural inclinations may be violated and values cannot be measured or compared.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of ‘law’ has proven itself a tricky one to articulate. Despite its relevance within society, it is hard to condense the idea of law down to its core tenets. In their quest for a concise definition, legal theorists have approached law from different angles, and have tended to divide themselves into two groups – those who believe that any summation of law must include reference to morality, and those who believe that the idea of law either can or must be completely distinguished from any moral considerations. This essay will consider the views of hard and soft legal positivists Joseph Raz and H.L.A. Hart, and natural law theorist Thomas Aquinas, in order to argue that, while all of these theories capture something of the relationship…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are a few differences between natural law and legal positivism. However, before diving into the differences, a definition for both the theories should be provided. Basically, a natural law is a law in which is derived from the validity of morality and reasoning. Natural law is believed to be served on the best interest of the common good as well. For legal positivism, it is viewed in the source of a law has no connection between reasoning and morality.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays