Why Is Julius Caesar So Unjustified?

Improved Essays
Roman dictator, Julius Caesar, declared himself consul and dictator of Rome after his victory on the civil war against Pompey, a general who was later assassinated after fleeing to Egypt after defeat and Caesar. Julius Caesar was soon “murdered by his own senators due to fear at a meeting in a hall next to Pompey’s Theatre” (History.com Staff 1) . Caesar’s brutal, violent death was led by two members of the Senate, Cassius and Brutus, and the actual assassination took place on the Ides (15th) of March 44 BC (“Assassination of Julius Caesar” 1). Even though Julius Caesar was allegedly a threat to the Roman Senate, the assassination of the Julius Caesar was unjustified because of his ability to solve problems within the Roman Republic and the citizens of Rome adored Caesar. …show more content…
During his short time “in power, Caesar relieved debt” in the Roman Republic (Biography.com Editors 1). Due to the previous civil war in Rome, a debt crisis emerged when “loaners demanded repayment of loans and real estate values collapsed” (Wasson 1). This resulted in the tremendous shortage of coinage in circulation, therefore, people hoarded whatever they had (Wasson 1). To solve the problem Julius Caesar “ordered that property must be accepted for payment at its pre-war value” (Wasson 1). This policy and other policies lifted a strain off the debt of Rome. As well as the debt crisis, Julius Caesar also “had to deal with the widespread of unemployment in Rome”(Wasson 1). To relieve the unemployment rate, the poor were suggested a new and better life in Rome’s overseas colonies (Wasson 1). He also ordered the construction of new public buildings Rome which also provided jobs for the unemployed (Wasson 1). By relieving the debt and unemployment rate of Rome proves Caesar’s abilities to lead Rome and its

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Republic was built on the traditional policy of compromise, devoted to ensure the welfare of the people. In time, the struggle for authority brought fundamental changes to the traditional sentiments of the Republic. As territory expansions brought great wealth into the country, power hungry senators and government officials harbored political ambitions and competed for power. Political treachery and self-interest within the senate and the assemblies gave way to economic turmoil and social unrest. The fight for control under the existing Republic ultimately demanded a conversion toward Empire, but before the transition could take place Rome would have to go through a series of civil war, mob violence and murder.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stevens, 2003), Caesar was able to exercise significant political control over Rome. The view that it was, “simpler to follow the blast of a trumpet than the swirl of contradictory obligations that had always characterized civilian life,” (Holland T, 2003) made up the framework of Caesar’s ability to gain power. His rise to dictatorship threatened the system which the Republic survived on, specifically the strict set of checks and balances that disabled any possibility for a sole individual to gain absolute power. His ability to dominate the Senate, magistrate and the people of Rome, threatened the Senate in particular, stated in the…

    • 1791 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Julius Caesar was assassinated by political rivals on the steps of the senate in Rome on March 15, 44 BC. Two of those political rivals were a former first commander under Pompey, Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus (a trusted friend) both whom Caesar had pardoned. He was stabbed 23 times. The assassins did not realize that Caesar death initiated the end of the Roman Republic. Caesar was exceedingly popular with the middle and lower classes.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar was assonated by conspirators that were said to be his closest friends. I am asked to explain the justification of the conspirators. The Conspirator’s in the assignation of Julius Caesar used jealousy, hatred, and discontent with the fashion that Caesar Ruled Rome as Justification for their act of murder again him. Furthermore, I will explain how these three justifications were used in the following paragraphs.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Gaius Julius Caesar was a brilliant man who did many things to benefit the people of Rome, the conspirators were completely justified in the decision to assassinate him. Towards the end of his life and political career, Caesar became a tyrannical and dictatorial man who violated widely accepted values of being a just ruler. He seemed to desire copious amounts of power which could not be granted by following the rules. An example of this would be the fact that he appointed himself dictator for life. He even violated Plato’s values of being a fair ruler (wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice), which were widely accepted views even in the Late Republic.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Atchity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7).…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Death of Caesar” by Barry Strauss, tells the story of history’s most famous assassination, the assassination of Julius Caesar. Caesar was a military dictator and in line for the crown until the Ides of March 44 B.C. when he was betrayed by his best friend and murdered. This was result of a civil war in Rome. As Caesar began to gain power he became an obvious threat to the Roman Republic.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the government began to take on more responsibility that was originally the citizens of Rome they weakened the people’s spirits, which therefore led to a decline in the entrepreneurs and wanting to gain more wealth in Rome (Document…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This paper is about Julius Caesar and if the laws he broke was for the good of the country or if it was for him. Was Julius really doing it for the good of the country because it seems like he did it for his own selfish deeds to make him happy. The things he did wasn’t for the good of the country it was for him so he could own more land and rule more places and he did whatever he needed to just to rule other places. What is in for the audience is they will learn if the laws Julius broke was for the good of the country or was it just for him. The first thesis statement is in an ideal society political leaders act in the best interest of their countries, the second one is in certain situations it may be justified for a political leader to bend…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caesar was a fearless, arrogant, and complicated ruler. He ran against Pompey in 48 B.C. Pompey was then murdered only a year after his defeat. This may cause you to believe that Caesar demanded for him to be killed in order to preserve his spot at the top. This quote from Shakespeare shows how Caesar had a huge impact on the people of Rome. Caesar didn’t listen to…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his reign as emperor, Caesar built a new harbour and canal for Rome, drained the marshes and improved the grain supply. Caesar was faced with a shortage of grain in Rome when he came to power, which he solved by arranging better supervision of the supplies coming into Rome, as well as improving access to imported grain by building a new canal and harbour to service Rome (Boatwright, 2004). Moreover, he nearly halved the number of people who received government grain and imposed duties on foreign goods (Suetonius, 41). Whilst the halving of government grain rations did not benefit everybody, the improved access to overseas grain and better supervision of grain imports had an irrefutably positive impact on the Roman population. As well as improving the city’s grain supply, Caesar made a positive impact on the lives of the Roman population through his draining of the marshes outside the city.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When one of the people in that triuvrient died caesar saw his opportunity and went and killed the other. Leaving him as the one ruler of Rome. Many nobles and higher class people didn’t like this. Brutus while making his speech to the Romans after he killed Caesar he says “ There are tears for his friendship; joyu for his fortune; honor for his valor; and death for his ambition.” His desire to become the most powerful person was the reason he was to be killed.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With the defeat of a vast majority of the newly obtained city-states Rome became rich in culture, money and goods, however these spoils were not shared amongst the masses, and they were kept to be spread amongst the few rich aristocrats, who ran the government of Rome. They were what I’d refer to as the one percent. Although this may have been advantageous to the people in power it was demoralizing to the common people of Rome who were often forgotten and left to fend for themselves, with the little that they…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Julius Caesar manipulated and bribed his way to gaining political power, specifically the consul of Rome by 59 BC, by becoming popular among the people. He was named governor of Gaul and became a threat to the Senate and Pompey who had already held power in Rome. Caesar became an enemy of the state and made an act of war by deciding to cross the Rubicon river confronting Pompey, a turning point that was the start of a civil war. The sources Suetonius’ “The Deified Julius Caesar” in Lives of the Caesars, Plutarch’s “Caesar” in Roman Lives, and Julius Caesar’s The Civil War each tell of Julius Caesar’s Civil War describing his political manipulation and rise to power involving the famous crossing of the Rubicon.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Julius Caesar was the first dictator for life and had shaped Rome for ever. Julius Caesar was born on either 12th or 13th of July in 100 BC in Rome to a well known but awfully poor family. Caesar’s life started at 16 when his father, Gaius, died, as a result Julius grew closer to his mother Aurelia. Julius at a young age had an ambition for politics and the idea of becoming apart of the Roman political system grew because of unstable order among the republicans. Caesar took a great step forward towards politics when he married Cornelia a daughter of Sulla a powerful man and dictator in Rome, Sulla had no part in the marriage and forced Caesar to leave or risk losing his property, Julius didn’t back down.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays