Why Is It Ethical To Eat Animals In Judaism

Improved Essays
It is neither ethical nor does it fit within Judaism’s values, to eat meat on a frequent basis, especially considering the environmental and ethical implications of the modern meat industry. Some justify human consumption of meaning by explaining that humans are separate from and superior to animals. Yet, this doesn't mean we have the right to kill and eat them; only the right to use them for work while treating them with respect (e.g. travelling on horseback or police dogs). If anything, our superiority to animals is the exact reason we shouldn't eat them. Animals eat each other to fulfill their physical needs, but humans can overpower their physical desires and focus on their ethical responsibilities. This is what makes us holy and separates

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is personal choice that matters, if these choices are made steadily. I agree with the assertion of the author of “Eating animals”. While some people believes that the world is full of many other problems and this issue is not significant enough to be the first on the “Main problems of the mankind” Agenda, I believe the thinking of adopting (even partly) the not consuming factory farmed meat lifestyle is…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, Animal-eating is a social practice that deeply embeds in the modern culture. Slavery, the oppression of women, and institutionalized racism also once had this status; however, few if any supposes that status is what makes practices morally right or wrong. Slavery, for example, is wrong because it requires the persistent exploitation, coercion and degrading of innocent people, but not because it is extinct in our society. The fact that practice has tradition on its side and a solid standing in certain cultures does not mean it carries any moral capacity.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The pleasure people receive from eating meat is far outweighed…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Name: Dwight Walters Date: 10/22/2017 Course: English Composition 1013-0011 Topic: Critique Against Meat Jonathan Safran Foer, a novelist gives us his thought to chew on with his opinion against meat where he brings out his experience and arguments in this article to sum up the effects meat have in today’s world, in health and also the general effects it have on the earth, have drastically crumbled making the world an inhabitable place. Which I totally agree with! Because we as human lack the understanding of how meat is produce and the general idea that follows behind of it.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Your grandfather’s Alzheimer’s has progressed to such a degree that his mental capabilities are no more than those of a lab rat. Scientists are in need of test subjects, so your grandpa is shipped off to a facility where they test unregulated amounts of drugs, makeup, and shampoos on him. R. G. Frey uses this example of testing on cognitively impaired humans throughout his piece, “Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism.”. This paper will outline Frey’s arguments on why human life generally has more value than animal life and highlight the exceptions to the rule that justify the mentioned scenario, while also presenting objections to the unequal value thesis and evaluating those oppositions with respect to humans with cognitive disabilities…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My belief is what history shows: Humans sustain animals, so in turn, they can sustain humans. The meat industry crosses a line, though. People should raise animals, and like fruits, raise them to be bigger and tastier. However, many companies are arguably cruel in attempts to raise the biggest and tastiest, and they erase much of the biodiversity of species. People must realize that animals are smart and like us; they have personalities, and they are social.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If animals are allowed to prey on other animals, then humans are allowed as well. The counter argument is that we abuse our animals through the farm industries. Meat industries and farms abuse the natural lifestyle of animals so eating animals as the "circle of life" is invalid. In my point of view, animals are here to serve us but we are abusing…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are omnivores, which means that they eat both plants and animals. Ultimately, the human can decide whether or not they are going to consume animal meat. I am analyzing the article “Against Meat” in the They Say I say collection of articles. Jonathan Safran Foer talks about his experiences with his struggles of becoming a vegetarian.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement consists of privileged ideology based off emotion and no logic. Nathanael Johnson explores these ideals in “Is there a Moral Case for Meat?” and a couple in the film “At the Fork” explores the morality of farming. While the article and film seem to take similar stances on the farming of animals, I disagree. Humans do not have a responsibility to avoid meat or mitigate the suffering of farm raised animals.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For millennia, humans and animals alike have hunted for prey animals. However, with the recent advances in the world, hunting is not necessary. Domesticated animals such as cows and pigs are herded to supply the populous with a sustainable meat supply. Hunting still remains, and so do domesticated slaughterhouses, so which is more ethical? Hunting, although seeming less ethical, is actually better than slaughterhouses, as the hunter chooses how he kills the animal, and gets closer to nature, and the wild animals have better lives.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical reasons behind embracing the veganism culture involve the exploitation of animals. Vegans believe that it is unethical to consume animal body parts or use them for clothing or any other household items. The torture and killing of animals for any reason, be it for research purposes, entertainment, or for its products is against veganism. As such, vegans feel guilt when eating animal products or meat coming from animals that have been killed or tortured. They believe that it is ethically wrong for people to put their welfare or the desire for animal products over the well-being of the animal.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that meat is a very wasteful use of resources and its clauses hunger and poverty. Studies show that a large amount of grain to feed livestock, this…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this were to be practiced then it would be acceptable and justified to eat animal meat. But, as long as humans continue to mistreat animals before killing or experimenting on them, utilitarian’s will not condone this. Utilitarian’s require humans to treat the animals like human’s and if they fail to do this then we should not use them to experiment on or to kill and eat. This is a positive aspect to the theory because we take animals for granted. Some animals are our companions, or they simply bring us happiness in different ways.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is only wrong if the hunter is killing the animal as a “just because” reason. It should only be morally acceptable if the hunter is killing the animal for food for survival. Another debatable topic is over whether killing animals should be against the law.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consumption of meat is not immoral; however, managing and limiting extremes by virtual practice would be ideal for health, animal cruelty, and environmental concerns. Within Aristotle virtue ethics being a critical thinker is essential to finding the best path to one’s virtue, so eating meat would be dependent on each separate individual experience. However, finding a balance by identifying the extremes, and develop a mean to best describe the ideal moral practices. There have already been health concerns from the over indulgence of eating meat. The consumption of meat is not immoral, but eating an excessive amount could be.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays