Civil disobedience in a democracy is not morally justified. I have one definition to give.
Civil Disobedience- an act against a certain law with no violence
One thing that comes with civil disobedience is change. But, if one person can create change that gives them more power than others. Civil disobedience fails to respect other people's rights in a democracy, because of that I negate the resolution. Therefore, the value of this debate is justice defined as giving everybody’s his or her due. The value criterion for this subject ought to be fair consideration of interest.
Contention #1: My first contention for negating civil disobedience is civil disobedience asserts one person over the others and