directed the Montgomery bus boycott in response to Rosa Park’s arrest. This peaceful resistance was effective because using alternative forms of commute (i.e. walking, biking, carpools), was not only perfectly legal, but had a well-defined objective. Rather than remain fixated on addressing the entire system of segregation, this boycott was a response to a specific application that system- hence how well coordinated it was. A little over a year after the boycott, the Supreme Court declared segregated buses illegal in 1956. In essence, not only did this have palpable effects, but in the process rendered any potential negative implications
directed the Montgomery bus boycott in response to Rosa Park’s arrest. This peaceful resistance was effective because using alternative forms of commute (i.e. walking, biking, carpools), was not only perfectly legal, but had a well-defined objective. Rather than remain fixated on addressing the entire system of segregation, this boycott was a response to a specific application that system- hence how well coordinated it was. A little over a year after the boycott, the Supreme Court declared segregated buses illegal in 1956. In essence, not only did this have palpable effects, but in the process rendered any potential negative implications