Why Is Capital Punishment A Hypocrisy?

Improved Essays
Capital Punishment, A Capital NO Capital punishment has a long and gruesome history, regrettably that history is not all in the past. Capital punishment, the practice of putting someone to death as punishment for a crime, is still exercised within fifty-eight countries and thirty-one American states. Although today’s methods of government sanctioned executions are more humane and less violent than our days past; when to be put to death meant to be hanged, flayed, burned alive or worse, it should still be considered by all, as a grave injustice to humanity. If killing is so wrong that it is considered one of the worst crimes a person could commit, why should the government be able to do exactly that. Capital punishment should not be executed …show more content…
Sentencing a man or woman to death for killing is an hypocrisy because they are basically being told that it’s unacceptable to decide who lives or dies, but since they took that decision into their own hands the government can decide that they deserve to die. Not only is it a total hypocrisy, but while killing a murderer you are creating more murderers in the process. If one man or woman does not have the right to decide who dies, than why can a government that is also made up of men and women decide who has the right to live? Now there are some who would say that the death penalty is a necessary evil, removing the less savory characters from society or that an eye for an eye is only fair. But any sophisticated society should not run on the principle of an eye for an eye because that is not what justice is, if you looked up justice in the dictionary, you would see that conformity to the principle of justice is righteousness, and righteousness is to act morally good in a situation(Citation …show more content…
The simple truth is that criminals on death row wait an average of fifteen years for their execution day, and about a fourth of death row deaths are of natural causes. That means a fourth of death row inmates die naturally and peacefully, while waiting for their execution day. (citation here) If a system fails to achieve its overall goal, in this case the execution of a criminal, is that system really an effective use of resources or time? The purpose of capital punishment is to put criminals to death, with the belief that it is justice for what they have done, but if a fourth of those sentenced die of natural causes, and a majority wait more than a decade to be put to death, it would be easy to say that the death penalty is in fact a severely flawed system that should no longer be practiced within any

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment has been practiced for hundred decades. In the past it was crueler, combined with torture thus making the death of convict as harsh as possible. Though now torture is generally prohibited, the death penalty is practiced in many countries and even in the as developed ones as the US. The death penalty has always been a big topic for debates as it is quite an arguable one. Though some people find capital punishment to be effective, the experience has shown that death penalty tends to be expensive, ineffective, arbitrary and too risky.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking the life of another has been considered a heinous crime that is worthy of capital punishment; but should taking the life of a person who has taken the life of another be justified? Is the murderer’s life less important than that of the person whose life he took? The death penalty has been the highest form of punishment around the United States, execution of innocent men, its negative influence on our society and the offence it has against human rights are all concerns that make the capital punishment wrong. The first established death penalty laws date as far back ats the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lloyd Turner Death Penalty

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Death Penalty Throughout history, people have condoned capital punishment and believe it to be a proper punishment for certain crimes. However, like with anything, there has been increasing scrutiny behind the death penalty. Capital punishment is the legal and politically correct way to refer to the death penalty. The death penalty has been around for thousands of years and has been performed in many different ways. Throughout time, the laws and rules surrounding this form of punishment have been altered and changed, and in many places, it has even been abolished.…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been a solution to crimes constantly. Justice systems around the world have chosen to take the life of a criminal instead of sentencing them to life in prison. Capital punishment should be abolished because the justice system should not have the authority to take a criminal’s life. According to capital punishment laws, it is not justified for a criminal to take a life, but it is acceptable for a member of the justice system to take that criminal’s life.…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital punishment has been used for many centuries to kill murderers or anyone who has committed a heinous crime. Although this may sound like a good thing, the trial errors are catastrophic. A judge and a jury are the ones to decide if a defendant gets the death penalty or a noncapital punishment. A defendant on trial for this certain punishment, does not get most of their rights of an American citizen. Congress should reconsider capital punishment as unconstitutional because of the amount of money used (1), the racial biases (2), the methods of death (3), and the people who are not being given the freedom of cruel and unusual punishment (4).…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘Killing people is wrong’, a statement everyone can stand behind, however, in some arguments, would depend on who did the killing (Koch 483). The death penalty has been under the watchful eye of the United States population for some time now, and has developed an audience on both sides of the argument. Many believe the death penalty is morally wrong, alluding to scriptures from the Bible. Others would argue the death penalty is a way of justice for the murderers and ultimately for the victims. The light shed from opposing views could help reach a resolve and put the issue at rest, however, in the meantime, one must pull from both sides to decide for themselves.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Do We Need to Understand Capital Punishment? According to the National Academy of Sciences (2014), 1 out of every 25 criminals are wrongfully convicted, yet despite this horrific fact, many countries still impose the death penalty on those found guilty of a serious crime, a punishment that is inhumane, horrible, and goes against all human rights. 140 countries have abolished the death penalty because, it does not serve justice, and it only serves as revenge. Amnesty (International. 2016).…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Capital punishment brings up many ethical issues. Capital punishment is seen in mainly two ways, a cure for society and an illness to society. Influential people such as Martin Luther King and Ghandi said that capital punishment adds to the negative idea that killing is a reasonable solution to crimes, while others such as Presidents Ronald Reagan and Abraham Lincoln believe that it sets an example to criminals to avoid at least major crimes that would warrant the death penalty. Capital punishment wasn 't always seen this way, because people were desensitized to things such as punishment by death, but things have changed now that the human life is much more romanticised. However, each country has a different stance on capital punishment.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment has always been a subject that people normally do not like to talk about because people, especially the government, knows that capital punishment is an unconstitutional cruel and unusual idea. Capital punishment should be used by states to execute a prisoner, given that the evidence that is against them is substantial enough and beyond a doubt calls for a death sentence. Even though capital punishment is rare and slowly decreasing (Source A), the fact that it continues to exist is the general problem with it. Capital punishment itself would go against the 8th Amendment, saying that “…cruel and unusual punishments [would not be] inflicted” and the fact that the American government would overlook this very clear part of the Constitution is very worrisome because they could do this with many other Amendments. In my opinion, capital punishment is unjustified in every way and should not exist because the best substitute for capital punishment is lifetime in prison provided with rehabilitation options for the guiltily…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Controversy on Capital Punishment One of today’s most popular controversial issues is the Death Penalty, also known as Capital Punishment. Capital Punishment is defined as the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. The different ways of executing always include an intolerable amount of pain or torture. The Death Penalty used to be quite favorable to citizens, seeming as people would gather out on the streets just to see a man being executed. This was until the 19th century when government officials decided to end public hangings and have them held only in prisons where the event was away from the direct public eye.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the criminal justice system, there are different ways court judges choose criminal punishment. The choices escalated from parole, prison sentence, and capital punishment. In any case, the death penalty is not addressed on a coherent point of view alone because it conveys emotions, morals, and religious components. The death penalty is accepted to seize assist wrongdoing that the criminal may carry out a wrongdoing later on. Which is argued that it gets lawbreakers free too easy and some people argue that it is the right discipline because of the wrongdoing.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Systematic Denial

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Systematic Denial of Human Rights The fire moved quickly through the house, a one-story wood-frame structure in Corsicana Texas. Flames spread along the walls, plunging through doorways, blistering paint and tiles, and blackening furniture. Smoke pressed against the ceiling, seeping through each room and every window crevice, billowing into the morning sky. Inside the house, children screaming “Daddy, Daddy!” and neighbors lining the streets to watch the commotion.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay Against Capital Punishment Google defines Capital Punishment as “the legal authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime.” It is argued that the death penalty is justice for those who commit crimes deserving of such extreme punishment. It is argued that the death penalty is a punishment set up so that the grieving families of the victims will feel a sense of accomplished justice. According to the Death penalty information center since 1976 there has been 1,438 executions. The death penalty should be abolished because it is a barbaric, immoral, and small-minded.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues throughout the entire history of man, has been capital punishment (death penalty). Is it necessary, and more importantly, is it moral to put someone to death for a crime which they have committed? This questions has been raised and debated in every country and at every period of time, as far back as known history will allow us to observe. This paper will present and discuss the dilemma of capital punishment on ethical grounds and present arguments both for and against capital punishment. This paper will also look at the history and evolution of capital punishment, as well as attempt to gauge what will become of the practice in the foreseeable future.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment should be abolished because it is too expensive to retain, it is revenge not justice, and it 's possible for innocent people to be executed. The execution of human life should not be something we advocate here in the United States, it’s sad that as a nation we preach peace while still executing our citizens. The millions of dollars being wasted on executions could be spent improving our criminal justice system, and in doing so, improve our country. Not only is the death penalty a waste of our hard earned tax dollars, but it also puts innocent lives at risk. Mistreated or mishandled evidence can easily put an innocent life on death row.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics