Beowulf's Unreliable Argument Essay

Improved Essays
The epic poem Beowulf has an unreliable narrator, for instance the whole poem is convenient for Beowulf, there is no evidence or proof to back up claims made in the poem and the poem contradicts itself. The poem is convenient for the main character Beowulf in which everything seems to work out for him. The narrator glorifies Beowulf in the story to seem like a God who knows everything and can fight any monster. But, in some instances the poem Beowulf can also contradict itself by using Pagan and Christian references in the same poem. Consequently, Beowulf has an unreliable narrator that is mistaken about the poem and is not internationally unreliable. Beowulf has an unreliable narrator because the whole story is too convenient for Beowulf …show more content…
But there is no one else to prove that except for himself. To prove that something happened you have to have evidence and proof. There are no witnesses in the Battle with Grendel's mom or evidence to show that he killed her. Also, in the swimming match with Brecca there was no one to prove that Beowulf got attacked by nine monsters and Brecca didn’t. Beowulf boasting about how many monsters he killed, “Lucky or not, nine was the number of sea-huge monsters I killed”(Raffel 307-308). Since Beowulf was the only one in that part of the sea, there was no evidence or witnesses to prove his claim. A lot of times narrators aren’t unreliable on purpose they are just misinformed about the truth. For instance, there were many different authors of Beowulf because it was an oral story. When stories get passed down they change because everyone has bias and everyone interprets things differently. Olson states that, “By contrast, fallible narrators do not reliably report on narrative events because they are mistaken about their judgements or perceptions or are biased”(101). It is not the narrator's fault they are unreliable, it's the situation they are in that makes these circumstances. In the end, there is no evidence or witnesses to prove the claims of Beowulf or the narrator which leads to the story contradicting …show more content…
Another factor that makes it difficult to determine if it is unreliable or not is that the poem is fiction and a work of fiction can be anything you want it to be. The ways I found the poem to be unreliable was that the whole poem is convenient for one character, Beowulf, and the story only has one point of view. There is no evidence to back up any of the claims made by the narrator. Another factor that contributed to the unreliability of the poem is that the narrator contradicts him or herself by including christian and pagan references in the story. Moreover Beowulf has an unreliable narrator, who has a misconception about the epic poem by it being too convenient for Beowulf, having no evidence and contradicting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The narrator in “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” proved over and over again to be unreliable. Through her desperation to be believed and tell a believable story, she allowed for multiple small and large contradictions to occur. The narrator is not incompetent, but she was careless in the way she presented the story. The malleability of the storyworld and its rules allowed for all the contradictions to occur thus discrediting the narrator. As the narrative is one that illustrates two extremes of which neither is appealing, the intended reader is left with nothing; a utopia that does not exist and a false utopia that no one would wish to exist.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oedipus Downfall Essay

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To make matters worse, Oedipus not only lacks knowledge of the underlying set, but is also oblivious to his own oblivion. Such a position opened the gates for many of his actions, resulting in neglect for the warnings he inherited. Oedipus was so far from the correct answer that he was the last to understand Jocasta’s. He could not comprehend her wishes for him to stop his search and brushed it off as “‘her pride of ancestry,’” (Sophocles and Storr 1074). Oedipus remained thick headed, and as the plot began to twist, it went unnoticed by him.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Roth’s book titled The Achievement Habit, Roth did a poor job with his arguments in the chapter “Reasons Are Bullshit.” Roth uses pathos to much, his ethos can be demeaning or cocky, and how he uses logos can be confusing to the readers. The first reason Roth’s argument is weak is because, even though he uses great pathos, not everyone can connect to all of his stories. Using pathos is a great…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When We Lie Analysis

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is not a credible source of information. He lied and said that he was all alone and he was not. If he lied about this he was most likely to lie about everything else in the story. He used false information which means this is not a reliable story. If he would not of used false information it would be a more of a believable story.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    These poets would necessarily extoll the charms of his eyes, his hands and feet, his lips, and his brow. ” (Shakespeare, William 12). However, according to Shakespeare, they would likely not succeed. This thought of Shakespeare does not surprise the reader since in “Sonnet 18,” Shakespeare claimed, no matter how beautiful the poetic language used is, it could not succeed in describing the beauty of his subject because the beauty of his subject is ineffable. Shakespeare does surprise the reader, though, with his claims of why a poem would not thoroughly describing his love’s beauty in “Sonnet 106,” as it contradicts his reasoning in “Sonnet 18.” He provides a different, unexpected reason for the incompetence of poets to describe the physical beauty of his subject.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He admires Kurtz for being able to do what Marlow cannot: name something with “belief…candour…conviction” (70). Joseph Conrad divulges in Heart of Darkness his frustration with the inability of language to capture the presence or contextual fullness of what it is meant to describe. Conrad reveals that a name cannot and should not try to reveal the essence of truth; at most, it can only hint at it. However, by attempting to allude to the “haze” rather than identify the essence, it may be possible to establish a connection between a name and its…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Poetry Analysis

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ion has no knowledge of Homer and poetry because if one can point out flaws and excellences of one poet, they should also be able to point out the same for another, otherwise their argument is invalid. Moreover, poets are said to be interpreters of the gods, making Ion to be considered an interpreter of an interpreter. Socrates believes that these interpretations get farther from the truth of nature, which aligns with his argument supporting the banishment of imitative poetry. I agree that Ion cannot make a judgment about one poet if he has no knowledge of other poets. If one does not have knowledge of a subject, the argument of superiority is not valid because every aspect of that subject is not known.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shark Finning

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is astonishing how humans believe they can take over the world and that all other living organisms are below them. When they go out and destroy these poor creatures, they do not take into consideration that sharks have a slow growth and reproductive rate, which makes them highly susceptible to extinction and it is difficult for many sharks to replenish their populations as quickly as they are being diminished (Fairclough). Sharks do not lay hundreds of eggs like uninformed people may assume; they give birth to one pup. If that did not make it difficult enough to replenish a population, the gestation period can be up to two years long! One baby every two years is not enough to restore a population.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the beginning of the short story, the narrator insists that he is not crazy. Poe writes, “Mad indeed would I be to expect it, in a case where my very senses reject their own evidence. Yet mad am I not…” (Poe 1). Although he continue to insists that he is a normal person, the narrator’s judgement is untrustful because his actions are not based off of a good morality. Since the narrator lacks a good morality, this gives him a poor sense of judgement, proving he is unreliable.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The distinction over the characterization of Brutus as a patriot or a betrayer is a hot topic for debate in the literary world, and as such, there are many points to be made for the depiction of Brutus as a betrayer. However, these claims are inherently based on little truth and fundamentally wrong as they are not backed by as much evidence and lack an understanding of who Brutus is as a character. Those that define Brutus as a betrayer claim that Brutus works only based off of assumptions and what other people tell him to do. In other words, he doesn’t bother to do his own research. On the contrary, this idea is flawed as Brutus deeply trusted his fellow senators and had no reason to doubt what they said.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays