Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

Great Essays
Centuries have come and gone since the first form of animal testing was performed by the likes of Aristotle and Eristaratus (Hajar). This was back in the days where there was no technology to test medicines or different types of substances, therefore it is reasonable why the tested on animals. To this day multimillionaire companies keep testing on defenseless animals. Humanity has been able to come far in so many aspects of life, but when it comes to testing new products or drugs we are at a horrifying standstill. Technology is the key to open an infinite amount of opportunities to create better and more accurate systems of researching and testing. How come it has not yet replaced the way cosmetics are tested, when it already has been proven …show more content…
There has been several tests that have gone wrong on humans but they when they tested the drug on the animal it went perfect. Élan Pharmaceuticals created a vaccine to fight Alzheimer, the vaccine worked perfect on mice, the vaccine cured the mice from Alzheimer. They used the same vaccine on humans but the results were different, their central nervous system inflamed (Alzheimer's Vaccine Trials Suspended). It is clear that testing drugs and substances on animals is not safe for humans. Another example to prove that animal testing is not a safe way to test drugs is the process of replacing hormones on women. Replacing hormones gives women a higher risk of suffering heart disease or stroke. When this same procedure was tested on monkeys the results came out as positive. Aidsvax did protect chimpanzees from getting AIDS but it showed the opposite on humans (Archibald) . These are a couple of examples, but there hundreds of other cases, that prove to the world that animal testing is not needed. Besides being unnecessary and a huge waste of money, it is not worth it to put innocent animals in distress for something that after all that pain was fruitless for humanity and science. Animal testing is erratic for humans, the country could invest that saved money on more useful purposes like

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Amber Hufford Mr. Limone Composition 12/11/15 Albert Einstein once said: “Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.” Through this statement, Einstein shows how important all living creatures are. Human or not they deserve to have a life they enjoy. Testing on animals takes their joy away.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Any cosmetic or medical companies will tell consumers that their products are the best since it has been tested on animals for safety, but the truth behind animal testing will make buyers think twice about their merchandise. Nowadays, more and more people are teaming up against animal testing. Laboratory testing is done on substances that make up medication and cosmetics, such as perfume, lotion, soap, etc. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, and check the safety of products destined for human use. Substances are injected into animal’s bodies to prove that products are harmless to people, and the environment.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other than examples of failures resulting from animal testing, there are other reasons doctors and scientists believe it is not effective. One of which being animals and humans have different genetic makeup. This means, because of the different DNA structures, some diseases are difficult to induce in animals since it does not naturally…

    • 1858 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Humane Society International compared a variety of animal tests with their in vitro counterparts and found animal tests were less accurate and more expensive in every scenario tested.” This is significant because it shows that there are so many other alternate experiments. An interesting fact; 95% of animals used in testing are not covered by the Animal Welfare Act which excludes the experimentation of birds, mice and rats. Which is ridiculous because people aren’t rats. They won’t react the same way to certain substances as humans do. Like if a chimp gets HIV it won’t get AIDS like a human would.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the FDA, 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal test, fail in humans(Klausner). It is time for scientist to divorce the idea of researching on animals and adapt to using methods like in vitro testing, computer models, and human tissues. Former U.S. national Institutes of Health director, Elias Zerhouni, said ,“We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On average, about 26 million animals are taken and used as little test subjects for big corporations to test their possibly harmful, and occasionally lethal, products before they release them to the public's use. This testing on animals began in 500 B.C and many corporations that participate in it see no harm, and have absolutely no intentions of stopping it anytime soon. There are many people that think testing these possibly dangerous products on innocent animals is not a big deal, but this paper will inform the public with some statistics and also give you the writer's perspective on why animal testing is wrong. One thing that is very arguable when talking about whether testing on these creatures should be approved, and continue or…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine this: a human wakes up in a lab one day full of wires, tools, and unfamiliar objects. A scientist comes in poking and sticking him or her with needles for no reason. A few days later, this same human is sick, afraid, and dying. Would any moral human being let this act continue?…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While scientists often argue that animal testing is necessary for medical advancement, it can be considered inhumane and is not always necessary. Animals are used in research to determine the safety of products, advance in science, study disease, and develop forms of treatment. While there are alternatives for…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Experimentation is Ridiculous “Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to humans” (Goodall). If most of these animals that are being tested on are genetically related to humans, then what may they be feeling. Humans get sad when they are lonely and go through pain. It is the exact same for those animals sitting in cages wondering when all the pain is going to be over. Animal experimentation is ridiculous, most products tested are never put on the shelves and most products have different effects on humans, there is a large amount of animals being tested on for no reason, and animals are feeling vulnerable every second they are in a cage.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even those animals that manage to survive in the process of testing are going to spend the rest of their lives in captivity. There is no excuse for such a…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Bad

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It will save the government money, save animals and human lives, and it will allow for us to move forward and discover new ways to help fight off diseases and look our best. Another alternative to testing on animals is using human skin leftovers from surgical procedures or donated cadavers can be used as test subjects (Alternatives: Testing Without Torture). This would be a very useful way of testing, because there are so many procedures each day the skin could be donated and used to research the safety of products. Even though there are pros and cons to each way of testing products if it does or does not include animals. I believe that it is best not to use animals in research labs to test vaccinations and other various products because it is inhumane and better overall.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals are there for people to enjoy and have fun with. They come in many different shapes, sizes, and types. Yet not all animals are not treated by the same standards as other animals. Animal testing is wrong because of the effects it has on the animals such as the harmful side effects, the reduction of life expectancy, and the lasting effects it has on the animal. Most of the time the test subjects are harmed in some way.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal Testing is Cruel and Unnecessary The use of animal testing is very popular today in the advancement of medicine, but the costly effects outweigh the benefits. There are many cost effective and positive alternatives to animal testing. It is not useful for the advancements of medicine and is only still around today for the financial benefits that come with these tests. Can we truly eliminate animals from medical research?…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is the human act of using lively, conscious animals to test products, not caring what the aftermath may be. According to peta.org, more than 100 million animals are slaughtered in U.S. laboratories. Those that have the heart to inflict this type of brutality do this immobilizing them in restraint devices for hours, drilling holes into their skulls having their spinal cords crushed. (peta.org). Other than the physical atrocities that humans are forcing vulnerable animals into, they are also isolated from their own kind, confined to barren cages, and therefore, become severely traumatized.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well the fact is that whether we use animals or not, there will always be a first person to test a new drug. The FDA has noted that 92% of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. Out of that 8% that pass the human trial, half of them will need to be re- labeled because of side effects that showed in the human test, but not the animal. III. There was a paper published in the British medical Journal titled " Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?"…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays