Why Is Animal Testing Necessary Essay

Improved Essays
Immanuel Kant said, ‘He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealing with men.’ Animals are used as pets to humans, Some people hunt them then eat them and they also eat each other. They affect us because they try and eat us, so really animals can be good and bad. Me personally I like animals because they haven’t done anything wrong to me yet. Animal testing should not occur because animals don’t need it, it’s not necessary. Recently I had a lot of animals and seen a lot, my favorite animal was a pig that my grandma had. In the quote that Mr. Kant said, means men that are bad to animals have a hard time dealing with men.
Animals are right research subjects because they relate to human being’s in different ways. Chimpanzees share 9 9% of their DNA with humans, also mice have 98% related to humans. Animals and humans are so biologically similar, they are susceptible to many of the same conditions and illnesses, including heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. Animal testing is mean and distressful to the animals. The Draize eye test
…show more content…
In vitro testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri testing, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used. Computer models, such as virtual reconstructions of human molecular structures, can predict the toxicity of substances without invasive experiments on animals. Microfluidic ship’s which are lined with human cells and recreate the functions of human organs. In Conclusion, Animal testing should not be done because like Mr. Kant said, He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also dealing with men, so if I’m cruel to animals I will have a hard time dealing with people. I personally think that animals should not because I’m just a nice person and I like animals and I don’t like seeing anything bad happen to animals. So there for animals should not be tested in my

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Amber Hufford Mr. Limone Composition 12/11/15 Albert Einstein once said: “Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.” Through this statement, Einstein shows how important all living creatures are. Human or not they deserve to have a life they enjoy. Testing on animals takes their joy away.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maybe one day technology will have advanced so far as to render animal testing unnecessary, which would be ideal, but that day is simply not today. However we must not be wanton or ruthless in our testing of animals, just as animal test subjects are necessary so are the ethical and moral policies that regulate animal testing. Scientific advancement should never rely on what is blatantly cruel and scientists should always strive to do as little harm or cause as little distress as possible to their test subjects. Animal testing can lead to great advancements in medical technology and it is our job to make sure that we take the comfort and well being of the animals being tested into account. After all, to anthropomorphize for a moment, isn’t that the least we can do for the beings who are helping us treat all the diseases we are susceptible…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People, especially scientists, are hurting innocent animals that did no harm to anyone. Animal testing shouldn't be allowed to happen because animals are getting hurt, they are not protected, and animals get mistreated. One reason that animal testing shouldn’t be allowed is because animals are getting hurt. For instance, the Draize eye test involves rabbits having their eyelids clipped open for as long as multiple days so that they don’t blink the product being tested away. Popular cosmetic brands like L'oreal, Lancome, Estee Lauder, and S.C. Johnson are used on animals.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am against animal testing is that substances tested on animals that may never even be used for some useful purposes. In other words sometimes animals receive tests for such substances that will never be approve or will never see public consumption, which make the process of testing completely useless. When things like that happen, it become clear how unjustified the die or suffering of an innocent animal actually was. Thus, animal testing should not be allowed since in some cases death or suffering of animals result in nothing useful.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine walking down a long row of cages. In every cage there is a terrified animal. The animals range from birds, rodents, and fish to dogs and cats. Although each animal is different, they all have one thing in common: they are lab subjects. Every animal is petrified while cowering in the corner of their cage.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New Zealand has seen the ban of cosmetics testing on animals. Isaac Davidson, reporter for the New Zealand Herald released an article on 31st March 2015, explaining the government’s decision to ban the use of animals for cosmetic research. The topic of animal testing is taken very seriously around the world, with the public of Britain protesting for decades and addressing their government to take the necessary steps to ban it. An example of this is the Lush cosmetics campaign, which took place on the 24th April 2012. In the 1980’s American animal rights activist Henry Spira, bought a full-page in the New York Times with an outcry to help protect the animals used in cosmetics testing.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay About Animal Testing

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Animal Testing is Bad Science, “Human clinical and epidemiological studies, human tissue- and cell-based research methods, cadavers, sophisticated high-fidelity human patient simulators and computational models are more reliable, more precise, less expensive, and more humane than animal experiments.” This means that scientists have many other alternative testing methods to get the information they need without the use of animals. This just proves that using animals is not only unnecessary, but just plain…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Engebretson 3) Animal testing may be beneficial in some ways; however it has not proven to be a completely accurate process as animal cells are much different than human cells. Animal experimentation should be banned because it is inaccurate, animal tests are more expensive, and it causes great pain and suffering to the animal on which the test is performed.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing is cruel and inhumane According to the New England Anti-Vivisection Society in the U.S every year, over 25 million animals are used for testing and agricultural experiments. These animals include; dogs, cats, ferrets, rabbits, pigs, sheep, monkeys, chimpanzees, etc. Most animals in labs are rats, mice, and birds. Approximately, tens to hundreds of millions.. “Animal testing (vivisection) is the process of testing new products or medical procedures on animals before attempting them on humans” ( “ Alternatives to Animal Testing “ ) Makeup companies often use animals to test their products.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We can figure out the effects of things on us without the animals, “animal testing practices in the U.S. are antiquated and unnecessary with the advent of alternative methods to determine skin and eye irritation that do not involve animals” (Bronner). There is no point of bringing in the animals for testings if we can figure it out without…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ultimately, animal testing is overall crucial. Many animals have suffered from the medicines and chemicals scientist have test them out on. Not only does it harm animals, but it harms us as there is fifty-fifty chance of effect on both animals and on humans. No one can really know if it will have an effect on us. As for rights, animals do have the rights.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal testing is when animals are tested in labs with products that we humans use everyday which is very bad because thousands of animals die every year and that number is only in the united states alone. Also, this tells us that if the product is ok or not ok the good thing is the number is starting to decrease down to 500,000 but that's still not good enough people want to stop it, but that needs to happen sooner!.In 2013 the European ]Union banned Animal testing the animal population is going down and it hurts the animals. Also, after they are finished with the animals they kill them with gas or they break their necks which is horrible by the way!!!! And sadly also very depressing these animals deserve MORE also India and Israel have…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unjust Animal Rights

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal are equal to human and must be protected at all cost. SInce 1800, non-human had a right to be protected from being use and abuse. This is because animal are part of the natural world and belong to the “ chain” of life. The animal right gave the animal the basic iralierable rights as foods, waters and shelter. Animal should have rights to prevent from suffering unjust.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine being separated from your family at birth, thrown into a cage, fed badly, forgotten about, unloved, and tortured through some of the most terrifying and worst pain? This is the daily life of a test animal. It is horrible, torturous, and unfair. Animal testing should be forbidden in every country. It is a completely pointless thing to do, and creates many negative effects on both animals and people.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goldberg, the author explores animal testing from a slightly different perspective. Goldberg acknowledges that sometimes animal testing can be beneficial, but he also goes into detail about other ways in which the same testing can be done with little or no use of whole living animals. The process of in vitro can be utilized in order to study different drugs on individual colonies of cells as opposed to whole organisms (Goldberg). This is really important in backing up the argument that animals should not be used as test subjects, especially if there is a way around…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays