Why Is Animal Cruelty Bad

I do think that animal cruelty is bad, but it was helpful. Now I don't want people to get angry at me but risking a human's life to go into space without if there was no dogs around is reasonable but if you were one of the people to go into space to test whether or not you can survive up there, you wouldn't want to be up in the sky revolving in space with no food. You would much rather save your own life and risk an animal to test the safety of being in space. Then what are they arguing for? It's either someone that can change the view of earth and possibly do something to change the life of others, or an animal that does tricks, may do something to make others do that weird "AWW" thing, and that may go abandoned in the streets life being saved. I know that animal abuse is serious thing but come on. A scientist dying or a creature that can be reborn dying. May I add that there are many more of its kin here on earth.

Using animals besides humans are really our only option. Animals are vast and have more of a population than humans when it comes to different breeds. If best apes are better test subjects than dogs and or humans. Ape/Gorillas/Monkeys are more closely related to us humans. So, testing chemicals or side effects from different objects is good. Though I don't …show more content…
But it did serve a big purpose and a huge role for humanity. I'm grateful that most test aren't on animals. Using animals as test subjects were most used back in the days of the beginning of technology. But it ultimately did us humans great and with a safer society. The only living animal that was used as a test subject during the space race was "Ham the Astrochimp" for the Americans. Ham was in the rocket which had launched in success and had almost died due to overheating in the rocket but miraculously survived. He was the only animal to be launched that wasn't a dog but a chimp, an