Why Is Alexander The Great

Improved Essays
Alexander the great was a Leader of the Macedonian society. His father was a King as well, though many people disagreed with his father. His father was a very cruel person. Thus, leaving some to think that Alexander would be the same way. Was Alexander and “great “ king after all? Yes, because he defended the Macedonians, He was patient, He spared lives, and he Respected Beliefs.

Alexander was great because in document A it says that he defended the macedonians with 30,000 troops. He wanted to protect his people, even if some did disagree with the way he ruled, or held grudges because of his father. He was persistent to keep his people safe. The reason some of the Macedonians and Thebans disagreed with Alexander's ways is because when his father was in rule, he held some Thebans in prison and then sold them into slavery. Of course some would disagree with that, but that also doesn’t mean that just because his father is like that, means Alexander is. After the battle with the Thebans over 6,000 Thebans were killed. Alexander was set to make sure he had the best military around. He wanted him and his people to feel safe.
…show more content…
In document B, Alexander waited three days for the Thebans to surrender but they were persistent on resistance. Alexander had a Job to do, he had to expand his city to allow more space for his people. Though he did order troops to destroy the city of Thebes, He did treat some of the rebels with compassion. Document B tells us of one woman who killed a Macedonian soldier but Alexander wanted to spare the woman's life. He wanted to spare her because he admired her Courage and bravery. Alexander wasn’t as bad as people make him out to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Also in source D he gave a man a talent making him very rich. In conclusion, Alexander does deserve to be called “Alexander the Great”.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He did not have concern for others. Alexander had great war intelligence. As was said in Document B. “Alexander got him into the habit of making these corresponding movements, This actually went on for a long time (until) Porus no longer reacted.” This strategy was wise because when they were going to set up an attack, Porus would not respond to it. Also in Document B it talked about how Alexander had boxed the elephants in, so that they Alexander was killing more of the enemy than Porus was.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Courage is the only thing that Alexander the Great definitely had. He stayed strong in the empire's weakest times. Living in the world that this empire took place in, was very tough. Many empires and city-states want power more than anything else. Alexander had the ability to conquer more land than any other empire in ancient times (Doc A and C).…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was worthy for his title. In the text it states,” The prince took charge in companion cavalry at age 18… Alexander became king of Macedonia at the age of 20.” This quote proves my opinion because he was in charge of the cavalry at a very young age, and he was responsible for the cavalry. Another piece of evidence to support my claim is,” Alexander’s army consisted of 40,000 soldiers… by a lion.” This quote proves my claim because he had lots of people in his own army that would protect Alexander’s citizens.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was a villain who knew how to manipulate people into thinking he was the good guy. Alexander had his fair share of good guy moments but overall Alexander used the good side people saw to manipulate them into doing as he wanted. Due to Alexander’s violence and mistreat to the human race he is villain. When Alexander the Great conquered new land he usually treated the people and the land in a cruel and disrespectful manner.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander murdered tens of thousands of people and conquered ample amounts of land. Alexander was the son of Philip II, The king of Macedonia. After Philip II was assassinated in 336 BC Alexander took over when he was only 20 years old. Before being the ruler of Macedonia he was a war leader at the age of 16. The Great Alexander was a villain because of the fact that he annihilated cities, killed thousands of people, and started many wars.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think that Alexander was not great. In document C it says “Alexander ordered all to be slain. The air grew thick with smoke from burning buildings. Seven thousand Tyrians died.” This concludes that Alexander was cruel and savage.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander's army never burned the cities down or torture their enemies, rather he uses those cities to expand his empire. His armies weren't marauders that would slaughter, torture, steal, burn, rape, and strip them from their homes, in which lots of other later conquerors9 were very popular of doing. They would rather kill their enemies without torturing…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most common belief amongst Alexander’s critics is that he was a cruel and inattentive ruler. However, historians who believe this misconception fail to acknowledge the evidence that expresses Alexander’s redeeming qualities such as good leadership and loyalty to soldiers and friends. These historians also do not realize that a crucial aspect to a great leader is to be successful, which Alexander has more than demonstrated with his triumphs and guidance over territories under his control. Alexander III is entitled to be a distinguished historical figure and has rightfully earned the dignified title “Alexander the Great” through his remarkable leadership, the substantial impact that he had over his conquered territories, and his personal consideration for others, despite the fallacy that he was…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a great conqueror. He united the greek city states and took over the Egyptians. Then he moved on and took over the large Persian empire. Even with all of these accomplishments, people argue over if he deserve the title “great”? I think that he does.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander, an admired individual, was considered great. Several achievements such as his brilliant mind, courage, and undefeated record for winning battles could be just a few of the reasons why Alexander was called a great. Adding the term “ the Great “ to a name indicated the leadership of a king. Someone who does what is right even when their are consequences, someone who is fearless, and someone who does the best for their country is a good leader. Alexander was great because he showed leadership and all of these characteristics throughout his entire life.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great is not that great because nothing is cool about putting his military in many wars and pressure. According to article “Study Say Alexander Not So Great.” “A young Alexander the Great thundered across what is now the Middle East on a bloody mission that ranks among the most brilliant military conquests in history. ”(#1).…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many different people through out history have looked up to Alexander’s methods of ruling and attempted to apply his strategies. According to one article, “In Medieval Europe, he became the chivalrous knight of the Alexander Romance and a ‘tyrant given to blood and plunder’” (Liebert, 2011). Throughout different eras that humans have lived through their views on Alexander the Great was changed. During the Greek and Roman eras people thought of Alexander as more God like as opposed to just a normal human…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays