Why I Went Into The Woods Rhetorical Analysis

In the passage Thoreau uses negative diction to amplify the idea that people shouldn't stress over the little things in life. In the first place, in the second paragraph Thoreau uses words such as "superfluous", "evitable", and "wretchedness" to describe those little things in life that are bad but, very much avoidable. For this reason, it shows how those little stressful things don't have to be taken in account for. Notably, Thoreau states this to show that, don't stress on avoidable things that cause too much stress. Moreover, in the passage the author throws words such as "shams" , "delusions" , and "soundless". The following words have the main idea of fake and false ideas. Getting the idea from the author shows us the negativity towards the "little things" which are probably false and fake ideas. …show more content…
In the opinion editorial below the speaker talks over the people of Berkeley. He describes the people as a very stressed and overwhelmed with anxiety. This connects to the theme of this passage of "Why I Went Into The Woods" that is people shouldn't stress over the little things. The people of Berkeley are stressing in agony due to little things that have stressed them over such as high housing prices, long lines, and traffic taking hours to reach your definition. Overall, the author uses the device of negative diction to tell people that stressing on the big things is okay but, to not stress on the little things life throws at