Why Hate Speech Is Always Protected

Decent Essays
Napolitano's article, "Why hate speech is always protected" was written on August 16, 2017. Napolitano is an American columnist and senior judicial analyst for Foxnews. The article was published in Foxnews, one of the leading news network in America. Because Napolitano includes his own opinion over the issue, this article would be categorized as an editorial. The intended audience for this piece would have to be Law professors, and Republicans who subscribe to Foxnews, as well as any upcoming Law students. Because the text was published just a few months ago, the discussion over hate speech continues to be talked about recently. In this editorial, Napolitano's central claim is that the First Amendment is, and will always, protect

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    R. V. Keegstra Case Study

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Therefore, section 319(2) of the Criminal Code violated section 2(b) of the Charter. The communication which is proposed to advance hatred against identifiable groups don’t fall inside the ambit of a conceivable section 2(b) of the Charter, exception concerning the expression statement in an intensified form. This exception alludes just to uttering communicated straightly through physical harm. Hate propaganda is not practically equivalent to violence. It passes on an implying that is offensive, however, the repugnance stems from the content of the message and not from its structure.…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Navneet Kaur English 120 Wendy Hayden November 1, 2017 Erwin Chemerinsky’s article “Hate speech is protected from free, even on college campuses” is a response to professor Robert’s C. Post on why all sorts of opinions should be expressed on college campuses, regardless of their offense and unpopularity. As students are disrespected by the thoughts of most conservative speakers, colleges have to shell out thousands of dollars for student safety and to allow speakers to deliver their ideas without any trouble. Chemerinsky, who taught law at UC Irvine, experienced this attitude when his students believed that school officials had the right to limit hate speech. As opposed to Post, Chemerinsky believes that hate speech should be addressed if…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First draft: Rosenblatt Summary and Response In “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid, and Dead” Roger Rosenblatt discusses the views of freedom of speech. He uses examples to show different people’s views on freedom of speech. He also adds his own opinion throughout the article. I may or may not agree on some of the views.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, "There's no hate speech exception to the First Amendment", was written in 2017 by Joan Vennochi, an American newspaper columnist for the Boston Globe. The newspaper article was published in the Boston Globe, a leading American daily newspaper. In this article, Vennochi defends the idea that the First Amendment protects even the speech we hate to hear. The author establishes her authority to speak on this subject by previously working as a City Hall bureau chief, and also as a State House bureau chief. The intended audience of this article is primarily the middle-aged generations who are specifically more involved in politics due to the fact that the Boston Globe caters to this group of people, Law professors, and Law students.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Middlebury Case Summary

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I chose this article because it shows how arrogant the students can be based on the survey. The student’s feelings against “hate speech” gets in the way, which leads them to make poor decisions. Why should hard core situations be prevented from being discussed on college campuses? The first amendment is at issue because the students believes that the first amendment will protect them under every circumstance. The code of conduct is placed in every education environment because it shows that some rights may be limited.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Hell You Say Sanneh

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Hell You Say: Critical Analysis In this article originally published in the New Yorker, Kelefa Sanneh is giving us a very objective view of free speech and the two sides to it. He points out that on one side the liberals are arguing that there should be some kind of limit put on it so that people don’t get offended. On the other hand conservatives are arguing that free speech is one of our most fundamental rights and there should be no restrictions placed on it. He illustrates the arguments made by the two sides but fails to make an argument of his own and write a coherent essay.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Don 't Abandon Due Process, Not Even For Terrorism”, is an article written on September twenty-second by Andrew Napolitano. The article discusses the use by the American Justice system of the practice of Due Process in extreme cases such as terrorism. Due Process is defined as, “fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen 's entitlement”. Since the turn of the twenty first century there has been a worldwide increase in the amount of large scale terror attacks especially on our domestic soil. Napolitano’s article pulls upon many sources being from factual information, testimonials, and recent events.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Anthony Lewis states in his book, Freedom for the Thought that We Hate, it isn’t as defined to such simplistic terms as one would assume. It is expressed within Lewis’s text and through today’s press that there has been drastic changes in the meaning behind the First Amendment throughout history and a change that has affected American…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having Free Speech is the basic right that Americans have, it is the ability to speaks one’s mind and ideas. Theres are many benefits to having the ability to project ideas without censorship. Caleb Yong author of “Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?” argues that the liberal justice has a special protection against the restriction of speech and expression, he calls it “Free Speech Principle” where it includes its “sensitivity to the distinction between coverage and protection (Yong)” that the speech should be monitored. Hate speech is too broad to single out the negative effect that it can have in any group. The main concept of this article includes the four categories that hate speech can be set in.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment was created to allow all people in America to openly express their opinions, regardless of popularity. I believe that white supremacists should no exception. However, the issue arises when the speech sprouts fear and racially motivated hate crimes. Therefore I believe that it is important for all speech; including white supremacists, to be protected by the First Amendment, unless the speech escalates to a point where human lives are at stake. White supremacists should have the right to voice their opinions without “the fear of being labeled and actual Nazi” (Fox News), and without compromising their safety.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The year of 2015 would be known as the year that seemingly everyone in the United States of America was offended by something. Throughout the year, it seemed as though the First Amendment had been liberally thrown around during controversial times. Due to this year’s subjects of controversy being surrounded around the First Amendment, some Americans are suggesting that the First Amendment should be regulated or restricted in special cases. Although it seems like only a few extreme number of people would even assert the idea that the First Amendment gives too much freedom, this idea is becoming more common among the American people. A survey conducted by the First Amendment Center reported that in 2013, 34% of Americans believed the First Amendment…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is probably the most important, and yet perhaps the most misunderstood and controversial in its interpretation, of all the amendments. Actually, it was considered so important that there was no debate at the time it was presented. It embodies some of our most important ideas about the meaning of liberty and freedom. Isidore Starr, who is recognized as a leader in the fields of law-related and citizen education has stated, “remove the First Amendment from the U.S. Constitution and you strike out the very means of testing the other rights and protesting abuses of government.”…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hate Speech Codes

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Freedom of speech, a basic right and amendment that most students who grow up in the United States come to learn and take pride in having from a young age. Many of us take this right for granted at times, what we do not realize is that there are so many places around the world that are continuously fighting for this innate right. Although we lack the fortitude at times, it is a vital right to all of us in our identities and abilities to grow as people and become who we are and allow ourselves to excel. The idea of speech codes, which can be commonly defined as: “politically correct" codes but are more commonly known as hate speech codes.” The issue of whether or not speech codes on campuses are justified is an immoral issue, which should in…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our Founding Fathers established the foundation of our country considering the diversity among the people- a nation of immigrants. Settlers came to the New World to escape religious persecution, a corrupted government, financial turmoil, or just to establish a better way of life and pursue a desirable quality of living. The people of this nation fought for what they presumed, and later declared, as their natural rights as human beings; “[t]he sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments, or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power” (Hamilton). The First Amendment is important to protect…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rauch’s opponents claim they don’t want to block criticism and inquiry, just hate and intimidation, but Rauch suggests there is no way to make a distinction between hate speech and criticism because one person’s hate speech is another’s sincerest criticism. His opponents argue, “In practice, we can distinguish verbal harassment from legitimate criticism by the hurtful intent of the speaker.” Rauch counters with, “criticism can be intended to hurt or discredit” and that “punishing the intent of criticism is more dangerous than punishing criticism itself, because to establish the intent of words the speaker’s mind is on trial.” Rauch’s opponents believe hate speech hurts people and that protective action is needed.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays