Against Gay Marriage

Improved Essays
There’s No Reason For Gay Marriage To Not Be Legalized People in this society think it is wrong to take advantage of marriage. According to Bible standards, the definition of marriage is to be between one man and woman (Marriage Equality in The New Republic). With same-sex couples or heterosexual couples, everyone shares the same value of love and commitment (Olson), therefore, everyone should be treated equally. The gay marriage issue affects society in several ways. One of those ways is that other people believe that gay couples want to break the marriage rule. Gay couples will take notice of this opportunity to be fully committed to their partner; to get married and to now feel and know they’re committed to their partner. However, the …show more content…
Marriage is defined as only one man and woman. However, it is also breaking Biblical standards. For example, “The denial of marriage … is the most profound statement our society can make that homosexual love is simply not as good as heterosexual love” (Baggett 1). Additionally, at its best, marriage is a stable bond between two individuals who work to create a loving household and a social and economic partnership (Samson 2). In this society, people believe it is wrong to take advantage of the word marriage. In the Bible, it is wrong to break the marriage contract. However, same-sex couples share the same values as heterosexual couples. Gays should also be treated with the same equality. Gays and lesbians share the values as opposite-sex couples, the values of love, commitment and happy, strong families. However, all people should be treated fairly; we live in a democracy where everyone may freely express their …show more content…
In particular, we live in a democracy where any and everyone may freely express a view. Similarly, we are in a world where everyone has freedom to express their self. The gay and lesbian community has gone from stonewall to the altar in two generations (David). This mean that before, gays were blocked from being able to marry. Now, they are taking that advantage and going out to get married while they can. The marriage license is the last defensible distinction between the rights of gay and straight couples (Von Drehle). No one can possibly have a legit reason for same-sex marriage to not be legalized. Same-sex marriage does not affect other people’s lives, so it should not be their concern. If same-sex couples break the marriage rule, let it be them. The rise of same-sex marriage from a joke to commonplace is a story of converging strands of history (Von Drehle). Baker suit, for the first time, linked the idea of same-sex marriage to an emerging line of high-court precedents establishing a right to privacy in matters of sexual intimacy (Von Drehle). Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples (Gay Marriage ProCon.org). Marriage is an internationally recognized human right for all people (Gay Marriage ProCon.org). On the contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses” want a child, they must

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The right to marry might seem trivial to some, but for those who have never been able too, it is an amazing feeling. Although not everyone feels so positively about it, those individuals are not in great company at least that is what the research suggests. That is not to say that these individuals and entities are not causing problems for those trying to enjoy the right. The most notable are the clerks in Kentucky refusing to issue licenses and the courts in Arkansas upholding poor legislation to attack homosexual couples. Overall, this case decision has set the stage for equal protection and treatment for the LGBT…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A marriage is just a legally recognized union, where partners work and grow together, not where one controls another. Both authors view differently, how marriages should be run, but fail to speak about how marriage limits your…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, he uses statistics to inform people about the realities of both homosexual and heterosexual marriages to make the reader have a deep understanding of the issue. The author uses history to capture the reader’s interest in the topic by showing how the gay marriage debate has developed over the years to its current status. One of the main aims of studying historical events is to enable people understand the current environment. History to a great extent shapes the current events and it is, therefore, important for people seeking to understand today’s debate on gay marriage to study marriage history.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article Societal Suicide: Legalizing Gay Marriage Will Lead to More Family Breakdown and crime. Author Charles Colson conclude that Gay marriage should not be forced on fellow Americans by judicial or mayoral fiat. The authors attempt to convince the readers that Americans should be able to have a vote if it should be passed or not. I believe that if this opportunity is given to Americans. Then it will settle the argument on both sides, for those who are against it, and those who embrace it.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Spiegel takes an opposing viewpoint in this article to one of the biggest reasons presented to support homosexual marriage – that withholding the right is unjust. He instead argues that it would keep within the bounds of justice to ban homosexual marriage. He describes heterosexual union as having a special value to society due to it an indispensable means for human birth. He continues on that thought that what has a special societal value deserves to have special recognition and sanction. When civil ordinances recognize homosexual unions as being on the same level as heterosexual unions, this causes the special value to society inherent in straight marriage to be rejected, and it is not right to deny those in straight relationships…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is argument all across America over whether gay and lesbians should have the right to marry. There is argument about whether legally same-sex couples have the right to marry. In the article “In Defense of Traditional Marriage” Ryan Anderson made arguments against same-sex marriages. He argues whether the government has a right to create a new civil right and then redefine marriage as well.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traditionally, marriage has been referred to as a union between a man and a woman. In marriage, it is a “commitment of both partners before God to love, honor, and cherish each other – in sickness and in health, for richer or poorer” (Miller 177). In recent years, gay marriage has become an epidemic in societal news whether it is acceptable by God or not. There have been many opponents against gay marriage all with “Scripture as the foundation of their…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    William Bennett is wrong in the sense that he believes that the legal union of same-sex couples will change that meaning of marriage, the rules that govern behavior, endorse practices that are antithetical to the world’s major religions, send conflicting signals to young persons, and that it would obscure marriage’s function. Before I propose my argument against William Bennett and overcome the objections that you may have, I will summarize his argument. 2. I will be critiquing William Bennett’s argument on same…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traditional marriage and family, based on one man and one woman, is the foundation for a free society and has for millennia been entrusted with rearing children and instilling cultural values. We condemn the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor, which wrongly removed the ability of Congress to define marriage policy in federal law. We also condemn the Supreme Court’s lawless ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which in the words of the late Justice Antonin Scalia, was a “judicial Putsch” full of “silly extravagances” that reduced “the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall (Lopez). Reply 1: Every human being has a right to choose whom they love, build a life with and, be themselves with. There is nothing wrong with people believing in traditional values.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A big thing is that the couple gets their marital benefits. When a couple gets married they get many great benefits that a single person wouldn’t get, so a homosexual would say this was fair to them. Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. (1) People want to believe that they can love the people that they want to love, not the people that they legally have too.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay marriage is indeed one of the most disputable issues that has been raging from the past till today. In truth, the issue of gay marriage is of utmost importance as it concerns individual rights, especially for the homosexual community. Since the last twentieth century, homosexuality has always been viewed with contempt and individuals are often discriminated or judged by their sexual orientation. In today’s modern world, the biggest advocates against gay marriage are perhaps the people of faith. With the moral beliefs that marriages support procreation, gay couples should never ever be given the right to marry as they are unable to have their own child like heterosexual partners could.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s world, illegalizing abortion or legalizing marijuana are only a few of the things that spark debate in Americans. As well as being another popular subject, same-sex marriage and its’ effects on children are put into this category of concerns widely discussed amongst our world today. Gay marriage is a matter that has been argued on for a number of years, and not just gay marriage but simply for the fact of being gay. This has not been accepted for decades, and although more of society is starting to accept it, it is further looked down on by many people. For a long time, people have disagreed with it more than they have agreed.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Calles ENG-101-D1140 Professor Walters 101915 Same Sex Marriage Gives Equality Imagine not being able to marry the person whom you love. Those who wish to spend the rest of their lives together should have the opportunity to get married including those who are homosexual. Sames sex marriage has been a topic that has been discussed and argued in the United States since the 1960’s. Same sex marriage should be legal because it’s part of our civil rights, gay couples make good parents, and the banning of same sex marriage will created a second class of citizens.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-sex marriage (SSM) is the controversial issues in this modern world. The traditional belief of marriage has been the recognized as a social union between men and women. The union of marriage represents the function to the procreation of humankind, personal and social identity, sexual intercourse, and socialization. The article explains that how elite policy preferences, the general public, and the gay people themselves have actively involved with for and against in the legalization of SSM.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception. Yale Law Journal. May 1997, v.106, n7, 1965-2008 Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1997.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays