1.) I understood the belongingness hypothesis to be the idea that we all have a almost a desire we are born with to fulfill a need to belong to someone. Not as property but to emotionally belong to someone, and for them to equally belong to us in the same way. It is not only something we are all born with, but without it they have found in studies that there is serious consequences, emotionally and psychologically.
2) The idea that there is a need to belong heavily differs from simplistic thoughts of just social contact because with the need to belong is said to be fundamental to survival. We need it because emotionally, psychologically, and physically we need close and reliable relationships in our life which complete that need to belong. Without that closeness of others we would be alone and unable to reproduce, unable to get all resources that we need to live. Having social contact with others that are not close to us or those that we hold intimate relationships with are very different because we hold different types of conversations with either. With those that we hold importance and closeness too, we confide and trust them, but others that we can consider acquaintances we are normally unable to express our deep thoughts …show more content…
Yes, I believe and understand we all start with our own attachment depending on our main caretakers, but depending on the relationship’s we hold in our own lives, negative or positive, that can change or shape or attachments too. In the past I had a bad experience in a relationship which I believe has a effected my attachment. I know have more anxiety when it comes to getting close to others especially when it comes to dating. So I strongly support that experiences do effect our current or future