Why Do We Have Animal Rights

Improved Essays
Kentarou Miura once stated, “Human beings are wretched things. They envy anyone who possesses even a little more than themselves. And year, they despise them if they have nothing.” This is not untrue when speaking about animals. Humans worry that animal rights will demand so much of humans that the capacity to help other humans, and live lives, will be diminished. Some humans view animals as inferior and fundamentally believe that animals are nothing more than property - tools - to assist in furthering the human race. Although some may argue animals are incomprehensible to humans and therefore do not deserve rights, society should grant animal rights because animals are more like humans than imagined and animals have an interest in being respected. Animal emotions and …show more content…
In the peer-review journal article written by Regents Professor of Law and Philosophy, William A. Edmundson asserts, “Because animals have interests that can be harmed, they can use, and do need, rights that serve yet another function: one that is straightforwardly a protective function” (Edmundson 349). Animals have interests in being respected, which is more specifically, their desire to prosper and survive without being subjected to unnatural treatment. These interests cannot be protected by current indirect duties alone because indirect duties are any duties society owes to non-human animals that are in fact owed to humans. The animal itself does not matter for its own sake in this argument. For example, if increasing animal abuse will lead to a decrease in human violence, then this would still be considered an indirect duty to animals. This is not how animals should be treated. Far from it. The concept of rights connotes “a kind of equality among rights holders, however unequal and diverse their rights holdings may be” (Edmundson 358). Rights endow their holders with a dignity that is appropriately more than the status

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    How would you feel if you were taken away from your home, taken away from your family, for the enjoyment of others? How would you feel if you were left in a tiny box with very little food? This is how we treat animals for our own personal and selfish benefit. Human benefit should never overrule any damage or destruction to these innocent animals. You may ask, what have humans done in the past and present to hurt animals?…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although humans have evolved to the point where we can devote some attention to honoring the animals that help us build our society, we should not degenerate our society to account for their feelings. One such story of degeneration is of Kevin Martin, a man whose research of AIDS medication was halted by the Swiss Health Department on account of an ethic review that had already been approved by other organizations.(Yong 39) Another example are animals farmed for meat consumption. Although ultimately, they are born just to die, they aren't killed for the sake of killing; They are killed to aid human society. As callous as it sounds, animals having more rights would work to stagnate human progress due to extra regulations both legally and…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the wise man Edward Freeman once said, “These awful wrongs and sufferings forced upon the innocent, helpless, faithful animal race, form the blackest chapter in the whole world’s history.” In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin discusses that animals are no different than humans. Being no different than humans means that someone or something is similar to a human being because of either their characteristics or similar body parts. Animals are like humans in the way that they are intelligent, affectionate, and skillful. Animals learn by their behavior as well as humans, however, the only difference is many animals are brutally abused.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement. The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no doubting the fact that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, or in any other sense for that matter. The reason is because they are not moral agents; they cannot do things out of a sense of right or wrong and cannot reason, as opposed to humans. Without reasoning, they are unable to have rights and therefore, are not responsible. Does that mean humans have the right to treat animals badly? Of course not; but that is for humans to decide, because animals cannot decide anything.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Response to Peter Singer on Animal Rights and Consciousness Long has the world and its popular philosophy considered animals to be mere things, mere living objects; lacking essential consciences, devoid of personhood. Humanity, however, has changed and is continuing to change, drastically. Knowledge is rapidly increasing, culture extensively expanding, and philosophy dramatically changing; thus, the personhood and, by extension, rights of animals is subsequently being reexamined. A leader, if not the leader of this reexamination is the philosopher, Peter Singer, who’s life journey lead him to believe that animals deserve equal consideration with humans, and greater rights than what they currently possess. Like Singer I feel animals should…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Immanuel Kant’s “Duties toward Animals, Spirits, and inanimate objects” he makes his stance on animal rights very clear. He believes that we have no direct duties to animals, yet we have indirect duties towards them in order to benefit mankind. Though many philosophers agreed with his way of thinking, many modern day philosophers and scientists are able to find flaws in Kant’s arguments. Kants belief that “we have no duties to animals, plants, material objects, or the environment as a whole” was justified through the idea that humans are rational but animals, plants, etc. are not. This idea was supported by Aquinas, an Italian religious leader and philosopher, who once stated “According to the Divine ordinance the life of animals and plants is preserved not for themselves but for man.”…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haley Price Mid-Term 10-7-15 Prompt 8 Equality of Animals or Peter Singer is a well-known Ethicist who rights about his thoughts that animals and humans should have equal interests. Before deciding to debate this topic, I took the time to read Singer’s “All Animals are Equal”. After reading this I believe that Singer ignored the reality of nature to build his argument; however, one cannot just simply “forget” the irreversible acts of nature. There is a great debate over whether animals should have rights that are equal to human rights. In Singer’s theory, “All Animals are Equal” the principle of equality is given equal consideration to all interests, regardless of actual abilities.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, although people share a close fondness to their animals, I would argue that the Principle of Humanity need not be able to account for animals as creatures worthy of being treated as “ends” because they possess neither humanity nor are they rationally autonomous agents. Similarly to how we use livestock as “mere means”, pets or other animals share the same property as being non-rational and non-autonomous agents. The view or idea that the Principle of Humanity has to account for animals as creatures worthy of being treated as “ends” is only caused by people 's’ personal attachment to animals and provides no reason why they should be worthy…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paper 2 In this paper, I will discuss Mary Anne Warren's "Speaking of Animal Rights" which discusses the strength animals have to rights. Warren’s paper is rebuttal to Tom Regan “The Case for Animal Rights” I agree with Warren that humans' reason responsiveness makes human rights more important. I will explain her argument which focuses on humans' ability to listen to reason as morally relevant to the strength of their rights.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Name: Georges Maljian Topic: Animal Rights General Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: By the end of my speech, the audience should acquire a better understanding of why animals should have rights and treat them the same way they treat one another. Thesis: Sharing most of the same feelings and emotions we do, animals are not ours to use for entertainment, eat, experiment on, wear, or abuse in any other way. Introduction:…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If animals are individuals, then using them to benefit humans at their expense would be to treat them as means to an end, and would thus violate their rights as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay’s objective is to present both sides of the issue, allowing the reader to further investigate and form their own ethical stance for or against animal rights. For many, it is…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this manner, society determines what rights are and how they apply to people. However, when addressing the relationship between humans and animals, the primary concern is whether to consider animals as beings that can have rights, especially those that are reared by humans (Angelia, 2017). While some schools of thought consider animals to be sentient beings, therefore, they have rights that ought to be respected even by humans, some continue to argue otherwise. If society or the majority determines rights then what happens to animals is left in the hands of people (Angelia, 2017). A specific community may decide that the animals they use for many purposes including food and fur among others do not have rights, which leaves them vulnerable.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays