Why Do People Use Wikipedia?

Decent Essays
Show More
Wikipedia is one of the most popular website around the world. Wikipedia contains more than 5,300,000 hundred article in many different languages. These two positive points help Wikipedia to reach all people around the world. However, some people like to use Wikipedia because it is very simple, which means they can get the information in very short time. On other hand, academic people do not like it because any one can write and edit any details. In addition, they stop using Wikipedia as a source for student, but they allow using it as start for research paper only. In my opinion, I suggest to use this kind of website, but the founder should put some rules that will help the website to improve and become more quality. For example, founder

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nt1330 Unit 3 Assignment 1
    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nt1330 Unit 3 Assignment 1

    Wiki- is an open website for users to add their own information to help others. It is a huge encyclopaedia where users can join and write articles or new ones to help people for what they are searching for. Information is passed on around because users can edit on the article and insert their own information relevant to the article. You can either edit or change information on it. Here is an example…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Googlepedia Turning Information Behaviors Into Research Skills Summary
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Googlepedia Turning Information Behaviors Into Research Skills Summary

    However, many questions and concerns have risen from this method of research. One question that comes up in McClure’s article is how do you know the credibility of your research since anyone and everyone can make it, especially on Wikipedia. McClure explains Wikipedia as “a web-based community of readers and writers, and a trusted one at that” (McClure 223). So writers do not see this open participation as a bad thing but more less a good thing. Through the online database you get to see everyone’s opinions which in most causes help you collect your own.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Summary: Is Google Making USupid?
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Summary: Is Google Making USupid?

    Is Google Making Us Stupid? When it comes to this topic on the internet versus our intelligence, I have a similar case to argue that Nicholas Carr, the author, explains. I agree with the argument that Google, or the Net in general are corrupting and shaping our minds. Carr starts off by describing his experience with deep reading.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    West Fork High School Website Analysis
    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    West Fork High School Website Analysis

    This site incorporates ethos, pathos, logo, creditability, authority, and objectivity to persuade the audience. I think that the West Fork School website is a very successful website. Imagine if the internet crashed forever, and the world would be without the power of websites. How would the world communicate and get their word…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Texas History Website
    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Texas History Website

    The web site’s smooth interface, fast loading times and provisions of such abundant primary source information make it an incredibly valuable resource for students…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Non Credible Sources
    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Non Credible Sources

    Another thing that makes Wikipedia a non-credible source is that anyone can make updates or change any/all of the information on the page as long as you create a Wikipedia account. This is portrayed within the URL provided above with each edit from different authors. The hardest part about sifting through the nutritional information was having to verify whether or not the information given on this site was accurate by going to a credible source to compare the information. Sifting through the information just way too time consuming, incredibly inconvenient and entirely…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Difficulty: Is Wikipedia Unreliable?
    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Difficulty: Is Wikipedia Unreliable?

    Waters in Why You Can’t Cite Wikipedia in My Class would say “Wikipedia owes its incredible growth to open-source editing, which is also the root of its greatest weakness” (16). I disagree with this statement and agree with Crovitz and Smoot instead, in Wikipedia: Friend, Not Foe they state, “Because Wikipedia is always evolving, its entries often include unconventional sections that might never have been included in a traditional encyclopedia” (93). To me this means that you could actually find valuable information in Wikipedia as it becomes available that you would not find in Encyclopedias since they are not updated as Wikipedia…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Is The Dumbest Generation
    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages

    What Is The Dumbest Generation

    Increasingly so, the world is shifting to life on technology, rather than life in books, but is it for the better? Humans are becoming less and less dependent on books and common knowledge, and more reliant upon engines like google to act as a brain. People under the age of thirty are paving the way for the upcoming “dumbest generation”, by replacing thinking with technology, disregarding books and reading, and lessening the language skills of their own generation. In the current age of technology, there are massive amounts of resources that can be used to obtain any kind of information that one can imagine.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Controversy Of Using Wikipedia's Information As A Subject
    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Controversy Of Using Wikipedia's Information As A Subject

    Although Wikipedia can offer a vast amount of information on different subjects, I don't think that students should be allowed to use it as a source in research papers. I feel this way because Wikipedia's information may not be able to be relied on as credible because its writers don't have to be specialists or have any type of expertise in the subject areas that they write about or contribute information on. Also, the information doesn't always have to be found to be accurate and true before it is added. Wikipedia itself states that not all of its information is "accurate, comprehensive, or unbiased" (Researching with Wikipedia). I find that to be very concerning especially if you are relying on the information found in it to be used for a…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Credibility Of Wikipedia
    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Credibility Of Wikipedia

    When Wikipedia is looked up on Wikipedia, look to see where Nature compared Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia, and on that page, it talks about how most criticism of Wikipedia states that it contains “some truths, half-truths, and some falsehoods.” They have been criticized many times for their being a free editorial site that anybody with an account can use. There not as popular as they were when they were first started. Why aren’t they fixing the problem of it being a free editorial site? It’s as if they don’t care that we can’t even use their website in…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hidden Intellectualism Summary
    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hidden Intellectualism Summary

    The internet helps people simply find knowledge from Wikipedia and discuss academic question on the forums. Thus, the academic forums and Wikipedia are supplemental evidences to prove that the Internet can do things which the college do. This idea confirms the function of the internet but ignores that quality of knowledge on the Internet is not valid. As we know neither academic forums nor Wikipedia belong in any colleges or universities or educational institution. Generally, most of the similar websites on the internets are open source and free to be edited.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of A Stand Against Wikipedia By Scott Jaschik
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of A Stand Against Wikipedia By Scott Jaschik

    A Stand Against Wikipedia by Scott Jaschik draw attention on how students should not use Wikipedia as a resources due to its inaccuracy details and lack completeness entries. In his article he emphasize, “ As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader- produced encyclopedia.” Scott have a point where there is plenty of inaccuracy details, but that’s not accurate at all. If the person gathered enough sources that seemingly relates one to the other, then there the sources surely is accurate. Basically, don’t rely on one resources, the researchers needs plenty of resources in order for him or her to make a case or support his or her idea.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Does Danah Boyd Use Wikipedia As A Credible Source?
    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Does Danah Boyd Use Wikipedia As A Credible Source?

    Even when I had been going through middle school and high school, my teachers had always been very clear about not using Wikipedia as a source. They would only go as far as to suggest that it could be used as a start for research, but never as an actual source for a project. She uses examples of student’s interviews, the fact that it is constantly updated, and how it has a better example of the American Revolution than an advanced class. She discusses how students had been told to not use Wikipedia as a “main source”, but they were not told why they were not allowed to use Wikipedia or why other sources were more trustworthy. People use Wikipedia to spread their knowledge and, it is usually much easier for people to understand a difficult topic if it is explained by another…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Self Evaluation Essay On Wikipedia
    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Self Evaluation Essay On Wikipedia

    The stigma held against Wikipedia, in my opinion, in collaboration with the previous point, is that it’s an easy solution for assignments. Without Wikipedia, a lot more student would be forced, for lack of a better word, to undertake assignments earlier, obliged to utilise more textbooks and journal articles to form more of their arguments, and essentially put more effort in, not to say every student uses Wikipedia for their work, or even most students, but there certainly is a procrastinating culture in university students with assignments being left to the last day seemingly commonplace. According to a survey/report done in 2010 on how college students use Wikipedia for their course-related research, found that “Students’ driving need for background context makes Wikipedia one of the predictable workarounds that many students use, especially during the first stages of their research process, students employed a complex information problem strategy in their research processes, reliant on a mix of information resources that were from scholarly sources and public Internet sites. Overall, college students use Wikipedia. But, they do so knowing its limitation.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Jill Lepore After The Fact Summary
    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jill Lepore After The Fact Summary

    “The Internet has become a primary form of external or "trans active" memory where information is stored collectively outside the brain.” (CITE). Instead of having to memorize ideas and facts, we can “Google” them, giving us the advantage of saving time which would have been taken up by thinking. The internet also provides us with a source of validation and evidence to justify what we know as true. Cons…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings