1. Tanksley reports about her young life up to this point that “if I had to do it all over again, I wouldn’t change a thing.” Can you use this as a point of departure for o Defining Nietzsche’s eternal return and showing how it works? o characterizing Tanksley’s professional life as one fit for approval by Nietzsche’s eternal return?
Nietzsche’s eternal return asks the question if you had to live with the choice forever in an infinite loop would you do it and be content with your choice? So yes, Tanksley would indeed repeat her actions and decision and not change a thing, she is content with her life so far with the choice she had made, her professional life fits Nietzsche’s eternal return, the choices she made landed her a job …show more content…
The values guiding Wallace Souza’s work as a news reporter in remote Brazil—especially the kinds of images judged appropriate for TV there—are quite different from those guiding TV reporting in the United States. Why does Nietzsche believe this kind of cultural clash is a reason to subscribe to the eternal return and simultaneously abandon traditional ethical theories, which attempt to pertain universally?
Nietzche’s eternal return asks a simple question if you had to live with the choice you make now forever would you be content? Every country and location are different. The United States is very different from the West Coast to the East Coast. Everyone has different beliefs and customs. What may be frown upon in one country or place may not be frowned upon at another; this is what separates us all. Eternal return removed what is ethical and asked that question do you want to repeat it forever if the answer is yes, then you proceed with your choice whatever it may be.
3. Tanksley reports about her young life up to this point that “working in the government sector where my daily responsibilities afford me the opportunity to empower and inspire everyday people is a career that ignites my passion for people.” How might an advocate of the eternal return respond to this sentiment?
Nietzsche’s eternal return asks the question if you had to live with the choice forever in an infinite loop would you do it and be content with your choice? So yes, Tanksley would indeed repeat her actions and decision and not change a thing, she is content with her life so far with the choice she had made, her professional life fits Nietzsche’s eternal return, the choices she made landed her a job …show more content…
The values guiding Wallace Souza’s work as a news reporter in remote Brazil—especially the kinds of images judged appropriate for TV there—are quite different from those guiding TV reporting in the United States. Why does Nietzsche believe this kind of cultural clash is a reason to subscribe to the eternal return and simultaneously abandon traditional ethical theories, which attempt to pertain universally?
Nietzche’s eternal return asks a simple question if you had to live with the choice you make now forever would you be content? Every country and location are different. The United States is very different from the West Coast to the East Coast. Everyone has different beliefs and customs. What may be frown upon in one country or place may not be frowned upon at another; this is what separates us all. Eternal return removed what is ethical and asked that question do you want to repeat it forever if the answer is yes, then you proceed with your choice whatever it may be.
3. Tanksley reports about her young life up to this point that “working in the government sector where my daily responsibilities afford me the opportunity to empower and inspire everyday people is a career that ignites my passion for people.” How might an advocate of the eternal return respond to this sentiment?