Why Do Major General Wayne Grigsby Read The Constitution

Improved Essays
Major General Wayne Grigsby should read the Constitution of the United States sometime; when and if he ever gets around to reading the Constitution he might discover that religious freedom happens to be guaranteed for all American’s even Soldiers of the United States Army. Canceling a prayer event that included General Boykin; an outstanding former military leader is disgraceful. Capitulating to Christian haters shows a lack of leadership at the highest levels in the United States Army.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The current Constitution allows for an amendment to be passed with ⅔ votes from both chambers of Congress and also with ¾ of the state’s approval or with ⅔ of the state legislatures calling for a convention. Sabato’s view on calling a convention is interesting in that his interpretation of a state’s petition to call a Constitutional Convention never dies as well as the visual of a light on, light off policy. Proposed amendments that a state switches it’s light on for will remain on until they reach 34 states with their lights on or until the state shuts it’s light off. This visual allows for a Convention to be called the moment the 34th state light went on, meaning a Convention could be called promptly. The one area Sabato says needs to be addressed is the lack of a standardized way of submitting applications for an amendment or convention.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the delegates were ratifying the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. began to divide over whether the constitution was a really that great for the country or not. There were Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists supported the constitution, and the Anti-Federalists were against it. The Federalists were supporters of the U.S. Constitution because they needed a strong central government to protect their country.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The father of this child did more to violate his sons first amendment rights than the school did. At least the school made it optional to participate in the recitation of this prayer everyday. The father basically told his son I don’t want you reciting that prayer because it goes against my religion. Then he decided to sue someone because the recitation of this prayer is contrary to his religion and what he believes, and his child also. Since when does a parent ever have the right to choose what their child does/doesn’t believe…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 1787 the constitutional convention was addressed to revise the article of confederation, Washington was elected as a presiding officer.-2 after a long disputed event, the convention agreed on a new constitution in which Washington and his fellow delegates signed on sept 17, 1787. -2 after the ratification of the new constitution, the electoral college unanimously elected George Washington as the first president of the united states. After a journey from Mount Vernon to New York city where was met by crowds of cheering americans, Washington took the oath of office in 1789. -5 During his first term, congressed passed a bill of rights and the states ratified the constitution. To inspire a spirit of national unity and confidence in the federal government, Washington took a tour through the northern states in late 1789 and the southern sates in 1791.-5 Throughout his presidency Washington sought advise from his appointed cabinet members in managing the nations interests.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With regard to the contentious attitude towards the new constitution of the United States, a Freeman’s Essay to the People of Connecticut discredits the arguments against the ratification of the new constitution and urges the readers to independently and justly judge the constitution. From the title of the document, the author is clearly pleading to the citizens, specifically of Connecticut, to disregard the eloquently formulated objections by anti-federalists against the constitution and outright denies any validity of these claims. The author’s criticism of the public’s ignorant acceptance of the opinions of influential figures serves to outline a core problem of the ratification of the constitution; the fear that the important values of…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (3) The Federalist Papers were written by three of our founding fathers' named John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and James Jay. They are a collection of 85 newspaper articles which were written in a period between 1787 and 1788 to promote the constitution of the United States. Adams, Hamilton, and Jay were trying to alleviate the fears of anti-federalists by arguing the need for the states to give the federal government more power and to replace the Articles of the Confederation with the Constitution that was being discussed at the same time at the Philadelphia Convention. Some of the articles were written with the purpose of showing why the Constitution was needed, and others were written as counter arguments to opponents of the Constitution. The articles made it clear that the states would have their rights protected under the new Constitution rather than weaken them, all the while giving the government the ability to deal with federal debt and to make decisions on foreign policy.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people would ask, why should they study the Articles of Confederation if it was a failure that took place in American history? The answer to that question would be that people need to study the Articles of Confederation, because it was the first Constitution that Americans ever had and even though it wasn't perfect, learning about the goals and the shortcomings of the Articles notifies future Americans of what they could do to make America better without repeating what happened in the past. The goals of the Articles of Confederation was to prevent the central government from having a lot of power.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilde says, “If one remains silent while others are speaking the words “under God,” one is open to the charge that one is unpatriotic, is unwilling to recite the Pledge of Allegiance”(65). The statement she makes here is not that convincing, because she does not give any evidence of a time were this was a problem. The pledge is a symbol of patriotism but just because someone does not recite it does not make them unpatriotic even if they do not say the phrase “under God”. She goes further on to say that, “I understand that the First Amendment to the Constitution says that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. I am not arguing that the words “under God” in the pledge add up to the “establishment of religion”, but they certainly do assert a religious doctrine” (65).…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Briana Phillips Keith Payne Honors Civics & Economics November 23, 2015 Should Gays Be Allowed To Openly Serve in The U.S. Military? Gays have been fighting for their equal rights since the beginning of time. People seem to always have a problem with homosexuals serving our U.S. military whether they are Christian or Atheist, although they do not seem to care as long as they don’t know about the person’s sexual preference. People are going to want to serve their country no matter their sexual preference.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1786 the federal government realized that America would not survive with the articles of confederation (“Articles of Confederation”). In the summer of 1787, 55 men gathered to amend the Articles of Confederation (“Constitution”). The Constitution had to have compromise for it to pass(“Constitution”). One of those compromises was the Bill of Rights (“Constitution”). There were two sides the federalist and the anti-federalist (“Constitution”).…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Describe some of the principles behind the Constitution. Discuss how the separation of powers and checks and balances are supposed to operate. How did the Constitution arrange the power relationships between the national government and the states? There are several principles behind the United States constitution, such as popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of power, checks and balances, and federalism.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justification It’s been over 50 years since the Supreme Court ruled in outlawing school sponsored prayer. When it comes to religion, public schools have to abide to two legal…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the early days of American history, many of the founding fathers took precautions while writing the Constitution. The reasons these precautions were taken was so that the people of the United States wouldn’t be oppressed because of any amendments or rules. There were many opinions on why/why not the constitution should be supported. However, the Constitution was altered so that we would be truly and undeniably free from oppression. Federalists and anti-federalists have many good and acceptable reasons on their beliefs.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, there has been a major conversational issue in the United States today about whether prayer should or should not be allowed in public schools. Prayer has already been banned in various numbers of public schools across the country. Many people have different religious views on this issue, but someone else’s religious view should not determine what someone else can do. The First Amendment states “freedom of religion”, so why can children not have this right in public school? There are plenty of different religions.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays