Why Do Hobbes And Locke Exist

Decent Essays
Hobbes and Locke are both famous in the category of political philosophers who’ve had writings that have been greatly influential in developing modern political thought. But while both spoke on the dangers of a “state of nature”, Locke agrees with potential benefits, opposite of Hobbes who is more negative. For example Hobbes speaks theoretically of states of nature, on the other hand Locke points out examples where they

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Both the Hobbesian and Lockean account of the state of nature rests on the notion of inherent equality, where there is no ascribed status or class. Everyone is essentially free to act as they will. Another point of similarity between these two philosophers is that self-preservation is central to the state of nature. They both believe that we enter a social contract to create a political authority because of the fear of death. Another point of similarity between Hobbesian’s and Lockean’s is they base their system on necessity.…

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes that without a ruler society will live in the State of Nature. This to Hobbes meant living in an almost civil war like society. Locke believed that in the state of nature people were good and honest, conflicts were resolved peacefully and justly. Locke believed that peace should be the status quo, and we can remain living this way as long as we respect each other. Hobbes believed that people can only live in peace when they turn over all rights to a sovereign.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While some differences between Locke, Hobbes and Rousseau’s social contracts are evident, the premises of their contracts are quite similar. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) was an English philosopher, known today for his work in political philosophy. He adopted an “atomistic” conception of society in which the individual, not the group, is central (Hobbes, p.157). Influenced by the New Science Era, he had a very negative and pessimistic philosophy towards human nature. Hobbes believed that without a stable government, the state of nature would end in total war.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 2017, three and a half centuries after the publication of Leviathan, Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration, prominent philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke held a holographic philosophical debate during the Global Government Convention. The debate focused on the conflicting views of both philosophers in the areas of State of Nature, Human Nature, and Social Construct. Thomas Hobbes, also regarded as a founder of modern political philosophy, published Leviathan in 1651. John Locke, often referred to as an Empiricist and the Father of Liberalism, published Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration in 1689. The historical context of both publications severely influenced the philosophers’…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were social contract and natural law theorist. They both have different views and beliefs about social contract and natural laws. Many people have their own thoughts on who is right and who is wrong; Locke wins my vote. Locke believes people have the right to life and impartial protection and because of this, I give Locke my vote.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hobbes Locke Analysis

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    State of Nature: Hobbes and Locke Some of the most important arguments in these two chapters showed great contrast among the authors outlining different expectations pertaining to the actions and beliefs of man and the definition of right and wrong, the need for rule in a nation and which will best provide for a successful society. Thomas Hobbs Chapter 13 over Leviathan focused mainly on man’s commonality pertaining to their desires to fight for his wants and desires, leading him to a jealous and destructive nature. That man is only concerned with his own self-preservation and not the needs of other men. This view steers him to battle for his place and status in the world. In this society, man is willing to kill one another to achieve their the highest reaches of the social ladder.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both share some similarities. They were both philosophers and social contract theorists during the enlightenment. The definition of the State of Nature varies depending on the person. Hobbes says that the state of nature is “war of every man against man.”. He said that people were born greedy and that everyone had the urge to gain more power.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes has been coined for planting the first seed of liberalism, but even though he has been credited for it, it is important to notice the aspects of conservatism found in his philosophy. There are four functions that all ideologies follow, including Hobbes’ Leviathan. The first function is the explanation for a political phenomenon. Since it is known that Hobbes wrote at the time of the English Civil War, it was no surprise that he was trying to explain the reason for the war. Hobbes believed, “that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The state of nature ties to his view regarding one’s vulnerability to be subject to harmful actions. One cannot fulfill the security of the first rule without a second derivative law. He writes, “…there can be no security to any man, how strong or wise soever he be…” (560 Landau). Given the nature of men, Hobbes argues that, any one man can’t live in peace in a state of nature (what is sometimes eluded to when he discusses relevant members being at war). An individual may maintain an advantage over another.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coincidently, Locke’s hypocrisy promotes Thomas Hobbes’ idea that people only strive for power, and will do whatever it takes to sustain that power (Hobbes, 1651 & Locke, 1689). In the end, the idea of human nature is inevitable subjective to each and every person and their philosophical…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Journal entry #1 Chapter 24 “ The Promise of Reason” – “The time will… come when the sun will shine only on free men who know no other master but their reason.” Antoine Nicolas de Condorcet. Hobbes and Locke were influenced by Hugo Grotius Idea of a political contract based on the natural laws. Locke related human beings as free, equal, and able to separate good from bad. Hobbes on the other hand, view us humans as being greedy, selfish, and aggressive.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke (1632-1704) is another modern political philosopher who also had strong views on political nature, but differed from Hobbes. One of Locke’s main hopes through his writing is to destroy the idea of monarchial theory: “it is impossible that the rulers now on earth should make any benefit, or derive any the least shadow of authority from that, which is held to be the fountain of all power, Adam 's private dominion and paternal jurisdiction; so that he that will not give just occasion to think that all government in the world is the product only of force and violence, and that men live together by no other rules but that of beasts, where the strongest carries it, and so lay a foundation for perpetual disorder and mischief, tumult, sedition and rebellion, (things that the followers of that hypothesis so loudly cry out against) must of necessity find out another rise of government, another original of political power, and another way of designing and knowing the persons that have it,…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, it is necessary to leave the state of nature once established the foundation of human life, that is, there's only independent individuals, it is necessary to build a consistent political society with such budgets. To make this work, Hobbes uses the concept of state of nature. He claims the existence of state of nature that are actually laws to achieve peace. natural law contained very basic and obvious moral precepts, of which no one doubted obligation. Instead, Hobbes conceives rather as technical rules that serve to an end, but not oblige because an obligation has to have some unconditioned…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau all agree on the hypothetical starting point of the state of nature, but they disagree on the details. Both Hobbes and Locke agree that the state of nature is associated with the state of war, while Rousseau believes that man is perfectly stable and non-violent. In order to understand the connection between human nature and war, we have to analyze each philosopher 's point of view. In Hobbes ' work, The Leviathan, he emphasizes that nothing could be worse than a life without protection provided from a well-functioning state.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays