Why Do Gun Control Laws Decrease Gun Violence?

Improved Essays
Gun control laws are a hot topic in today’s news. From political campaigns to opponents and supporters, they have been on the front lines of disputes for some time now. Most of this is due to the rise in gun violence, especially in mass shootings. Data has shown that both more restrictive gun laws are linked to a decrease in gun violence and that states with fewer gun control laws also observed a lower gun related crime rate. Gun violence has always been a problem. However, it has been on the rise in recent years and this has struck fear into the hearts of many Americans. “Over the past decade in America, more than 100,000 people have been killed as a result of gun violence” (FACT SHEET). More and more people are becoming worried that if there …show more content…
Proponents argue that they are being enacted to stop future gun crimes from happening. In the United States, there are “88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and per capita number in the world. 22% of Americans own one or more guns” (Gun Control).
Most studies done within the past twenty years have shown that with their implementation there has been limited effect on decreasing gun violence incidences. Gun control laws are only going to show effectiveness if they are completely enforced. “Bans often include "grandfather" provisions, allowing ownership of an item if it is acquired before the ban, complicating an assessment of causality” (Hahn).
While some gun control laws are effective in reducing gun violence, others seem unnecessary and too restrictive. Law-abiding American citizens should not have their rights taken away because others could not follow the law. “Guns don’t kill people; people kill people” (Gun Control). Politicians target guns as the reason for mass shootings and the cause of so many deaths when they are rallying support for gun control laws, when, in fact, it is not the fault of the gun for the event of the crime. The gun does not make the decision to shoot at another person. Those who commit the crimes are responsible for it and should have to suffer the consequences. Responsible gun owners are suffering for the actions of criminals and others who commit wrongdoings. The real problem lies with how do you prevent criminals and other such persons from wanting to harm

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    That when you buy a gun, you’re either going to be hurting yourself or another person. The Board also makes note of how officials try to distract the public with “arguments about the word terrorism,” (End the Gun Epidemic in America), but aren’t calling the shooting sprees and other gun shootings terrorism. Pathos was used well here because terrorism is always going to be an emotional and frightening topic to think or talk about. Especially since it’s happening in your own country but no one wants to shed light to the idea that mass shootings are related to terrorism. Pathos was effective because the argument to stricter gun laws provoked fear and emotions by shedding light on the real reason to buy a…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin with, guns are not safe. There are those people who believe that guns have no role in the hands of people, if we don 't have gun control, anyone can easily get guns. It is dangerous that if the people who don’t have enough knowledge of using guns. Gun owners are more dangerous than others who don’t have weapons, even though the gun owners are victims of the crimes. Similarly, guns can cause unintentional crimes.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Argument Essay

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    People have taken advantage of certain laws that have been passed in the following years. Some don’t even care about the consequences of their choices and how it affects others. The plans the government with gun control just won’t work. Gun control will not stop a single thing because people can find a way around it in a heartbeat. They think the shootings that are happening now are bad, but they need to see what will happen when they try to make it harder for those who are planning to do something against the law or horrible things with guns.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    With all the recent events that push for gun control, it’s time to stop and think on who this is really helping, the good law abiding citizens, or the law breaking criminals. With the impact that guns do in our society, it is time to stop and think what gun control could do for our nation. (MORE DETAIL) Although gun control seems it might help our society, gun control is a bad idea, because it disarms law abiding citizens and arms the criminals. Gun Control takes away the gun of people who follow the law. Citizens who follow the law will be the only ones affected by gun control because the guns that citizens buy are on a record, their guns could be taken away with ease because there are gun records of what guns the law abiding citizens use.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just because there may be an interrelationship, or correlation, between two concepts does not mean that one is necessarily going to lead to the other. Establishing strict gun laws would put unnecessary restrictions on law-abiding citizens; therefore, they should not be enacted. Stringent gun laws do not always effectively prevent crime as criminals will still have their own connections to a gun in order to commit a crime; people need to stop playing the blame game and become educated about guns and the safety regarding them. Laws are put into place to give order; not to take away a basic right, such as the right to bare arms. If the right to bare arms were to be taken away, what would be taken away next, if that doesn’t solve the “problem”?…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some opponents of tougher gun control legislation say that criminal activity is very likely to occur when there is no force of protection present between a criminal and a defenseless target. Criminals will prefer to commit their diabolical acts in highly populated “gun free” zones, where citizens are not armed and are subjected to the villain’s will. According to John Lott Jr., former chief economist for the U.S. Sentencing Commission, every mass shooting since 1977, other than the 2011 Tucson killings, has occurred in a gun-free zone. Whether these predators like to pounce upon their easily accessible, unarmed prey, or think that they are more likely to be stopped in areas where people are allowed to carry concealed weapons, they still are taking advantage of the gun control laws (Taylor).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some families use their guns to get their food. Others use them for protection. So even if the government wanted to take guns away, people are going to protest on the fact that they use their guns for useful, non-violent purposes. Not everyone uses their guns to try and hurt people. Dalmia also mentions in the article, “No matter how much liberals want a gun-free paradise, they can’t simply wish away a deeply entrenched gun culture.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens. This victimization of the defenseless is even prevalent if the criminal does not have a gun. The government of the United Kingdom banned handguns, and over the following years, not only did murder go up, but more people were being killed by knives and strangulation…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays