Research Paper On Animal Rights

Better Essays
Grace Cremeans
Miss .Beverly
April 7, 2016 Animal Rights Animals. They have a brain, a nervous system, and they communicate through sound. Sound familiar? Like a human? In reality there are only a few differences between human and animal biologically. So why do we treat them so differently. We won’t test on ourselves for risky things so why are we doing it to animals? Animals should not be used for testing because they can feel it, they are helpless, and many of animals die from it every year.
Animals should have rights. However, they are necessary for human existence to be used as food, but that’s what the creation of animals was made for. Not for testing medicine, cosmetics, and etc on. Animals should have rights
…show more content…
So instead of using the term “animal rights,” people should use the term “animal welfare.” Animals don’t have the same rights or even close to the same rights as us humans. Animal welfare states that we know that animals may be used for certain purposes but shouldn’t be mistreated or abused. Some people say that animals behave selfishly, and only look out for themselves and their own interests. Since animals don’t behave morally they don’t deserve to be treated morally by human beings. If we want animals to have rights like us humans then that means we can’t breed or kill them for …show more content…
They shouldn’t be tested on because they don’t do anything to deserve to be tested on. Animals feel pain just like us humans, so if we aren’t treated with that disrespect then why should animals. It’s not fair to the animals. Many animals die each year from how brutal the testing is. After some testing, the testers decide to just dispose of the animals themselves in inhumane ways like the breaking of the neck, or in a more humane way by putting them under medically. But either way, the life of a helpless animal is being ended for no reason, when this life could be being used for the comfort of a human, or for food, depending on the animal it is.
Animals should have rights for a good amount of reasons. Animals should be treated with care and respect. Animals don’t deserve to be tested or harm in anyway because they didn’t do anything. Animals should have at least some rights so we can improve how animals are abused, tested, and disrespected by humans. Would you want your pet to be taken away for testing? Would you want to watch the brutality of it? If not, then why let another animal go through this.
Works

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Animals should have similar rights as people, and we need to learn to share our planet with them. Just because we have more power over most of them, doesn’t give us the right to abuse or torture them, because we wouldn’t on our own kind. Animal testing is pointless, it doesn’t not give correct and reliable results, and it does not benefit either people or animals hugely. Joaquin Phoenix once said, “It takes nothing away from a human to be kind to an animal.” We will not see any negative effects on humans if we start treating animals with the respect and freedom they deserve. It is a factor that is bringing our planet down, and we need to stand up for it, and we could save millions of lives a…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Additionally, animals do not exhibit human diseases such as HIV, Alzheimer's disease and many more. Therefore, it sounds useless to think that testing drugs to these diseases using animals will give accurate results (Slattery & Cryan, 2012). Apart from this, using these animals as test subjects also greatly violates the animal rights, because animals just like humans have feelings and deserve to be treated right. However, if not for the use of these animals, the medicine world would be stagnant. However, the use of animals as testing subjects should be banned, because it greatly invades animals’ rights and puts the animals through a lot of pain and suffering.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While animals are getting tested from the scientists the animals are getting tortured and their skin gets irritated by the products that makes animals die from the despair they get put through. Companies should change the way they are going to test out their products to not put animals into an everyday life situation of getting tortured. Even though, there is proof that the United States or any other country does not require scientists or any other type of company to test on animals. Every animal has rights just as a human being's do which that applies to everyone is why Europe has stopped testing on animals since 2009 from being tested by cosmetics, if a person kills an animal for example buffalo, deer, goat, etc... without some type of permission that person can go to prison or get a fine for…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animals do have rights to a certain extent. Animals have the right not be mistreated and used by humans. Indirect duty means that we don’t have direct duties to animals, but we do have duties about animals. So torturing an animal is wrong because it harms the animal not because it upsets other humans. Direct duty means that we have a direct duty to not be harmful, but kind to animals.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many people aren’t willing to acknowledge that animals feel pain and suffer too. Animal welfare was set up to protect animals from any physical harm done by humans such as abuse, experiments, etc. Unlike, animals rights activist, animal welfare activist sometimes support animal testing as long as the animal is cared for, fed, and treated well. On the other hand, rights activist…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fox, an ethical philosopher, “Animals do not have ‘rights’ equivalent to humans due to their exclusion from the human ‘moral community’” (Baier 137-138). This “community” includes having a sense of time, being able to make decisions and having a sense of self-awareness (Baier 138). Therefore, testing on animals is more ethical than on humans, based on their inferior status. On the other hand, Peter Singer is against animal testing on the basis that animals do feel an extraordinary amount of pain and should have as many rights as humans. Animals should have equal rights just like…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think moral treatments of any living thing should just be left to what the people and our brains think is morally right or wrong. It is often argued that we treat animals morally wrong by testing chemicals on them to make sure it’s safe for human use. In order for our species to thrive and expand our knowledge we would need to test certain chemicals on animals because they are disposable. Sure humans are also disposable both since we are barely reaching the pinnacle of basic human right, I doubt people want to be volunteering other people to have experiment done on…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As sentient beings have a natural interest in not suffering. So moral consideration does not depend on who can reason morally but in whom can suffer. Morality is a matter of the interests of sensitive beings, and therefore it is unfair to exclude non-human animals. Animals have moral value and deserve thoughtfulness because they can experience pain. According to utilitarianism, the welfare of each must count.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In contrast, killing animals is not valid because it is cruel thing to do. First, some country kills many animals for ceremony by cruel ways. For example, they cut animals’ head while they still alive. They stabbed animals with no mercy. It is uncivilized festival.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hence, there is no reason why humans shouldn 't tolerate lesser intelligence in animals. Singer explains that although both groups cannot be treated the same because of their significant differences, humans should aim to meet the needs and interests of animals. They ought to take into account the effect their actions have on animals. For instance, no animal can tolerate torment. This is because animals ' feel pain just like humans.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays