Why Do Animals Have Basic Human Rights

Improved Essays
Animals are different than us in many ways. For example, they walk differently, eat differently, and look different. There are many other traits that animals have that humans don’t and vise versa. Why do we treat animals differently? Is it because they don't speak like us there for we don't listen to how they feel? Animals can't talk for themselves, all they can do experience the emotion. For example, apes, they are a very smart species. Scientist have found ways to communicate with an animal through sign language--a language we can understand. Scientists have proven that apes are the closest animal species we have to humans. Many people don't like the fact that apes are being tested. People argue against apes being tested in labs. They also believe that apes should have basic human rights, apes should have freedom. Why do people argue that only apes should have freedom? Apes are still animals. There are many other animals in the world that get tested on in labs and are taken from their homes just to do research on them. If apes are given basic human rights they would be treated equally, and because they are treated equally by basic human rights then all animals should be treated …show more content…
Perhaps they don't deserve it because animals don't know right from wrong when their natural instinct is to survive. You can't punish a animal for killing another animal the way you can punish a human for murder. Humans understand right from wrong. Giving animals basic human rights is also not a good idea because giving animals human rights would mean not being able to test on animals. Who then will there be to test on. It would be inhumane to test medicines on a human and risk losing a Human's life rather than losing a animals life. By testing on apes and other animals scientist have found many new cures for a lot of diseases. Taking apes and animals out of labs what would we have to test

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Fox, an ethical philosopher, “Animals do not have ‘rights’ equivalent to humans due to their exclusion from the human ‘moral community’” (Baier 137-138). This “community” includes having a sense of time, being able to make decisions and having a sense of self-awareness (Baier 138). Therefore, testing on animals is more ethical than on humans, based on their inferior status. On the other hand, Peter Singer is against animal testing on the basis that animals do feel an extraordinary amount of pain and should have as many rights as humans. Animals should have equal rights just like…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, animals do not exhibit human diseases such as HIV, Alzheimer's disease and many more. Therefore, it sounds useless to think that testing drugs to these diseases using animals will give accurate results (Slattery & Cryan, 2012). Apart from this, using these animals as test subjects also greatly violates the animal rights, because animals just like humans have feelings and deserve to be treated right. However, if not for the use of these animals, the medicine world would be stagnant. However, the use of animals as testing subjects should be banned, because it greatly invades animals’ rights and puts the animals through a lot of pain and suffering.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This shows that getting research from animals for humans is not always approved by the human body, even if scientists say that animals have the same traits as humans. Animals are getting harmed as they are being tested on for research and it is very cruel because the outcome of the animal is dying and by the treatment that may not work on humans it is not worth it for the animals. As a matter of fact, Animal experimentation does not need to happen there is other alternatives that can replace…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another reason why apes are not allowed to have the same rights as humans is because of their use in medical testing. Apes are normally used to test vaccines that we use, which makes many scientists afraid that without being able to test vaccines on animals, the amount of vaccines made will be reduced and doctors will not be able to treat…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some claim it is better to use animals as testing subjects rather than humans. However, that is one of the main areas that they are misguided in. While yes, it is good if humans can stop others from being used as test subjects, using animals as testing subjects does not help humans. Instead, there is another possibility that helps both humans and animals, and none of them have to receive pain. Despite that, since using other methods of testing can be a little more complex, many companies do not want to execute it, sticking to the old fashioned way.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals deserve the same rights and security that humans have, considering we would unanimously oppose to humans being abused in a lab. It is utterly unethical to sentence such an enormous amount of animals to a life in a laboratory cage and intentionally causing them pain, it 's bad science, and its wasteful. It is completely unethical to a sentence such an enormous amount of…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, it seems that most people lie in the middle of the sides on this issue. It is easy to point to crowded living conditions and abuses within the research and speak out against those ethical failures. What is undeniable, and is pointed out by Medical Research Chief Nic Fleming, is that in situations where these animals, namely chimpanzees are necessary in order to help the human kind find vaccines and cures for deadly diseases, then we should be able to do so and would be in favor of it. In this case, we cannot cut funding to invasive chimpanzee research to account for these types of research that do still exist. As long as the guidelines set forth by the NIH are met, there is no reason we cannot conduct this research in an ethical manner, and potentially save the human race if the time calls for it.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that Animal experimentation has played a huge role in enabling people to discover, prevent and cure diseases. Many diseases were found and there were numerous advantageous results from the experiments. However, there is a problem with this reasoning because the drugs or medicine that are invented by animal experimentation can respond differently in humans. According to the statistics, 92 percent of all drugs that were guaranteed safe to be used for humans and that were effective in animals, failed in human bodies because they were dangerous and did not really work. ( Food and Drug Administration) Penicillin is a antibiotic agent which is commonly used in the treatment of bacterial infection.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals should have similar rights as people, and we need to learn to share our planet with them. Just because we have more power over most of them, doesn’t give us the right to abuse or torture them, because we wouldn’t on our own kind. Animal testing is pointless, it doesn’t not give correct and reliable results, and it does not benefit either people or animals hugely. Joaquin Phoenix once said, “It takes nothing away from a human to be kind to an animal.” We will not see any negative effects on humans if we start treating animals with the respect and freedom they deserve. It is a factor that is bringing our planet down, and we need to stand up for it, and we could save millions of lives a…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think moral treatments of any living thing should just be left to what the people and our brains think is morally right or wrong. It is often argued that we treat animals morally wrong by testing chemicals on them to make sure it’s safe for human use. In order for our species to thrive and expand our knowledge we would need to test certain chemicals on animals because they are disposable. Sure humans are also disposable both since we are barely reaching the pinnacle of basic human right, I doubt people want to be volunteering other people to have experiment done on…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays