Why Did The Huns Change

Improved Essays
Although the Huns originated in the region of Mongolia, they still tended to digress through the European country fighting other Europeans. While the Huns lived in a hunting and gathering type of society, they often had intelligent tactics. For example, the Huns were victorious at Adrianopolis in 378. After their win, they began to concur that horses paved their way to victory. But, sometimes the Huns were inept when they came upon military tactics. After what the Huns discovered using the horses in battle, they did not change their military strategies for the next one thousand years. The only time they did change was when gunpowder what introduced to them (“Hunnic Empire”). The Huns were relentless to change their ways, until they saw what advantage it would give them to change. The tribe still portrayed their hunting and gathering, even after they migrated throughout Europe. …show more content…
The Huns could not have had a powerful empire without a leader. The Hun’s leader was Attila. Attila was neither well-liked or kind, he was often brutal and not seen as a luminary among his people. Before his rise to power, Attila murdered his brother, Bleda, who was the past Hunnic leader. Although Attila was not a kind leader, he did accomplish a lot for his tribe. Attila eventually died in 453, so his sons took over the empire. Attila’s sons were eventually defeated by the Germanic tribes in 454. Their lost eventually lead to the death of the Hunnic Empire (“Hunnic Empire”). The Huns lasted for many years living their barbaric lives, but it eventually brought them down to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rome was just starting to head into its sudden and uncontrollable descent in power. In a 50 year period Rome lost 22 leaders. Out of that ROme Lost 12 Leaders to assassination (Doc A). The Huns were a main danger to Rome.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Visigoths were the first to arrive in Rome, and they took over killing the last emperor. Where Odovacar became the first German ruler of Rome. Lastly, the main reason why Rome fell was because of military weakness, “because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.” Because of the army's laziness, when the Huns, visigoths, and Ostrogoths came and attacked they weren't very prepared so they lost. Also, “there fail of conscription of senators, bureaucrats, and clergymen were entitled to avoid the draft; and among other groups who escaped were cooks, bakers, and slaves.”…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a rule, someone who can influence a whole civilization would be a great leader. Most of the time people would want to follow a favorable, smart, and steady leader. Not a weak, unsteady, naive…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Their amazing war strategies allowed them to gain respect and allowed them to dominate their territory. E. The empire disbanded by religious intolerance. This is a common recurrence throughout empires. They soon decide to not follow their founder’s example and cause chaos and alienate the religions from themselves causing uprisings and assassinations.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Horses were introduced by the Early Spanish and French and the diffusion of the horse took many routes and eventually spread throughout the central plains. In the process, some horses would run away and become wild horses. The horse became a valuable resource in the central plains and changed the mode of hunting,…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was smart, he cared for the land, and he cared for his people. He was able to achieve profit, clean land, and protected people. Therefore, Kamehameha was an effective leader. Kamehameha kept all the islands under control with different governors and gained profit from trading. Today, Kamehameha is a well known leader.…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because the soldiers were weak and lazy, they could not prevent invaders from coming into Roman territory. According to the Brain Pop, it shows how the soldiers left their posts to fight one another, which made it easy for invaders to get in Roman territory. The Huns were another reason that the Romans fell. Document D states, “these swift-moving and ungovernable people make their destructive way amid the pillage and slaughter of those who live around them.” This shows that since the Huns invaded Rome, they must have weakened Rome by getting into Roman territory, and killing a lot of people.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kamehameha Leader

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Effective Leader Essay Kamehameha was the first person to rule all Hawaiian islands,Kamehameha was a strong warrior and has a lot of mana. He gained strong foreigners that taught Kamehameha's men how to use guns and cannons. He killed Keoua and a lot of other strong ali’s to be the first king of Hawaii. He is an effective leader because he was smart, cared about his people, and he was good with trade. Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was a smart person.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Comanche Empire

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States would no be anything it is today without the help of the 18th and 19th century. The battles fought and the lands expanded all helped the US create a better environment for its future. One major factor that helped the US was the Comanche Empire. The Comanches are one of the most empire back then in the 18th century. They dominated Majority of the southwest using violence to expand their empire.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christopher Columbus landed in the new world in 1492, he discovered a group of peoples and named them Indians. The Natives seemed to be uncivilized and lack humanism, often thought to be savages. However, the English were the real savages in their crusade to inflict their religion on anyone who wasnt English. Indians were unevolved compared to the mighty English. At this point Native Americans have yet to discover the horse.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Attila the Hun was a great ruler that only ruled for a short period of time. When he first became ruler with his brother the Huns were a stable country. His uncle Ruga, who ruled before him campaigned against the Eastern Roman Empire. When Attila and Bleda took the throne, they immediately improved the Huns wealth. They invaded the Eastern Roman Empire to conquer new lands.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: How Barbaric were the "Barbarians"? Although Mongols were strikingly ruthless through their military tactics (Doc. 2, 3,4,5), they were able to develop a rather sophisticated society (Doc. 7, 9, 10) and executed noteworthy and structured accomplishments (Doc. 1, 6, 8). As shown in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5, the Mongolians are quite infamous for their questionable harshness considering their military techniques.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Hun nation was the up most important to Attila everything he did was for his people and he felt that all his leaders should have his thought process, but he also encourages critical thinking in his leaders, He was aware that just by changing a leader out could influence the atmosphere of his army and nation. He bound his leaders to the tradition of their office they held and made sure they know the role they had to play in it. He also establishes a high standard of performance from his leaders of if in charge be in charge attitude. He made sure that he picked leader that want to be leaders and would excel in the position and their beliefs line up with his goals for the Hun nation. There was a lot more profound conviction what his leader need to do.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongolian and Roman Empires were both vast and expansive empires. Both societies were able to accomplish tasks that no other empire had previously achieved. Although both empires were extremely successful in very similar ways, there were many differences between the two vast empires. This paper will explore both the similarities and differences between the two sprawling empires. Similarities…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The westward sweep of Atilla the Hun from Eurasia caused mass migration of barbarian tribes into the outskirts of the Empire. Given the Western Empire’s economic downturn it’s armies were already sparse and weak and the continuos barrage of barbarian hordes along the borders depleted them further until they were virtually defenceless. So once barbarian tribes in the North and East discovered this fact they took their chance to pounce and so swept through and reconquered territory from the Romans. Rome was sacked twice in the space of three decades the final one leading to the virtual destruction of the West Empire by Odacer a Germanic King. In 475 A.D the Western Empire was completely reconquered by barbarian tribes.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays