Why Did The Articles Of Confederation Fail

Improved Essays
During and after the Revolutionary War, each state set up their own government and laws to give themselves power and rights. The states did not want the same thing to happen to them by a stronger government, that happened with the British government creating taxes and laws against the colony, so the states gave the central government limited powers. The attempt to create a limited government in the Articles of Confederation failed because it gave the central government limited powers. The American government couldn’t effectively create and enforce rules because the states had all the real power, which made the central government weak.

The Articles of Confederation had several major problems that made it fail. The Articles didn’t give Congress an executive or president and no court system. A central government within the Articles of Confederation had no real power. All of the states maintained most of their power, which made it hard to establish a real government. Governments need power but the government under the Articles hardly had any powers. Without an executive or president there was no central figure or central body to guide decisions or act on behalf of the separate states. Under the Articles of Confederation,
…show more content…
There was no national currency in the country, each state had its own money. With no national power to regulate trade in America, that meant each state traded with whichever states and countries they wanted to. For example, South Carolina could decide to trade with and tax Virginia but not trade with Maryland, and they could also trade with other countries without Congress interfering. The states having all of their power and the ability to regulate that power how they wanted could lead to disorganization and issues within America, and Congress would not have the power to prevent problems and fix

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    With each state acting separately, there was no national military, thus putting the borders of the new country at risk. However, due to Article II, the central government was not able to interfere with any interstate issues. The central government was a single Congress, which left the execution of the few laws to be left by each state. The powers given to Congress in the Articles of Confederation were the ability to declare war and peace, make treaties or alliances, to coin or borrow money and to regulate trade with…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, even though the Articles of Confederation seemed viable at the time, the Constitution was a much superior. Even though the US Constitution took away power from the state governments, it did not give all power to one specific hours. Instead it gave power to separate branches which all had the ability to check the powers of the other branches. This made…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After many of the great forefathers declared their independence from Great Britain, we fought a long and messy war. After this war was over, America was a finally a free country, except instead of it being a tightly knit country, it was a discombobulated collection of states acting almost like countries by themselves. The main reason for this was that the Articles of Confederation were currently governing our country, and due to the many shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, it left the nation weak. The Articles of Confederation did not force tax collection, and they also did not allow the government to raise an army.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When writing the Articles of Confederation the founders were fearful that if one delegate had too much power the entire democratic system would fall apart, therefore they did not include a chief executive. While this fear was well grounded in history, after all the Roman Republic fell after Julius Caesar took advantage of his powers as Consul and Dictator, without a chief executive the congress was often deadlocked. Because the national government only consisted of a congress and this congress could not agree on major decisions, government barely functioned. In addition, the lack of a national court meant that disagreements between states had to be resolved without an impartial court…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the government was not completely effective because of the power imbalance, the nation's needs not being met, and financial struggles. Congress did not have strength over the people to enforce laws; the citizens desired a less powerful government after the harsh rule the British government enforced on them previously. They got a weaker government, but the Congress lost its authority to rule over the states. Citizens felt that the government lacked in stability and unable to deal with the nation's problems. A military was a basic need for the states, but because of the cost, congress struggled to pay for one.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America, under article two of the document, enabled its states to keep its own sovereignty, freedom and independence (Magill, 289). This ensued the federal government to gain an insufficient influence and the states to keep its authority. This appeared to be a considerable obstacle when Congress tried to address the issue of taxation amongst the states. Congress was deficient in its power to impose tariffs as each state alone could tax itself or oversee its commerce, although each was to contribute its share of money to maintain its confederation (Magill, 289) . The Articles of Confederation ordered consequential duties to the Congress without giving them the power to accomplish those responsibilities (Magill, 289).…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, there was a weak central government, which then gave most of the power to the state governments. The Articles of Confederation, however, ended in 1787 because they refused…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following the end of the Revolutionary War, America needed a government system that was different from the British Government, this led to the birth of the Articles of Confederation. The articles were first reviewed in 1777 in Philadelphia, but it wasn 't until four years later that they were ratified by the existing 13 states. These articles only managed to keep the country together until it was replaced by the superior Constitution in 1789. The main reason the Articles were significantly weak is was that sovereign power in the states was too strong, as mentioned in the 2nd article “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.” Seeing as the United States separated from Britain, a monarchy, the first draft of American government did not have a strong centralized government.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The articles of confederation were weak. They didn’t establish a proper form of government and no one liked them. The articles of confederation led to no money, a weak central government, quarrelling states, boundary and border disputes, and no military leadership. The articles of confederation accumulated all power in one assembly rather than distributing power. “...…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Revolutionary War ended September 3, 1783, and then the era of fear begins. The framers, recently escaping a monarchy, were all but terrified of a strong central government; therefore, they wrote the articles of confederation. It gave most of the power to the states. Article II from the Articles of Confederation states, “Each State retains its Sovereignty, freedom 1231.3 and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled” (United States, Article II). To elaborate, it means that each state is responsible for their own affairs and that the national government is to remain separate.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution overcame the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and provided for the organization of the new government. In the 1780s, the United States created their first form of government after the colonists won the Revolutionary War against the British. The Articles of Confederation was a very weak form of government that had multiple flaws. At the Constitutional Convention, the Great Compromise, the Electoral College, and the Three-Fifths Compromise were made to satisfy everyone’s needs. The Debate Over the Constitution was between the federalists and the anti-federalists.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The articles of confederation that got ratified in March of 1781 was the first trial to develop a government in the country that was newly born. The articles were truly focusing on what rights states ought to have, the government 's subsidizing and the western 's outskirts region. The issue with the articles is that it offered things that were needed, but at the same time negated the same things that were offered. For instance, the articles say that the government could set up an armed force. A government builds up an armed force on the off chance that it doesn 't gather any money by taxes.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Weakness of the Article of Confederation During the course of the Second Continental Congress in 1777, the Articles of Confederation were adopted for the proposal of a central institution. This meeting started in 1775, gathered many of the most brilliant minds of that period at Pennsylvania. Delegates were sent from the thirteen colonies to represent in the convention. The convention was a series of meeting, on the attempt to solve political and social issues. One of the major concern was the concept of distribution in power.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been numerous framework papers throughout the history of the United States, however, not one is quite like the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is different than every other archive because it includes individual rights that relate to every single American citizen. It is the first ten amendments mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, and it provides necessary limits on government power. Although it began in controversy, it was vital to the success and prosperity of the country, and it is still extremely relevant today. Before the Constitution, the United States of America lived by the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays