Introduction: In Dallas Texas police were in a standoff with sniper that killed five officers and still was on the loose looking for his next victim, the police were still negotiating with the gun man, when they sent in a robot to kill the gun man. The robot kills the gun man, but people were asking why use a robot to do the killing for them? Today I will be talk about three things as if why did the police use a robot to kill the gun man. First why did they have to use it, second did the police want to use it, third will the police continue to use these robots in very hostile situations. Then I will come to our conclusion and sum everything up and if it is a good thing or a bad thing that the police should use a robot to kill very dangerous
…show more content…
Body Paragraph
Main Idea 1: Why did the police have to use a robot to the gun man
A. Did they have to use it because he was too dangerous to capture on their own?
B. Did the police need to use it because the sniper had eyes everywhere around the hotel he was at?
C. Did the police have use the robot because the sniper was a Marine or a Navy Seal so he was smarter than the police.
D. Did the police use the robot because the sniper was capable of taking on fifty S.W.A.T men coming through the door?
Second concrete idea: My second step did the police think he was a wanted person and want to use the robot right away or see if they could get it done their selves to kill the gun man.
Idea 2: Did the police want to use the robot right away or see if they could do it their selves to kill the gun man?
I. Did they think he was a criminal that was a good shot and too dangerous to get to him by force?
II. Did the police think they were out match by just one guy inside a building?
III. Did the police think they could calm him by negotiating with him to see what is the problem and not use it?
IV. Did the police want to be lazy and get it over with so they could go …show more content…
Did the police want to use the robot because he was still firing shots at police to keep them away?
Third concrete idea: Will the police continue to put robots in the field in very hostile situations or will they use robots to do their handy work for in this time of year and go on to the next century.
Idea 3: Will the police continue to put robots in the field in very hostile situations or will they use robots to do their handy work for in this time of year and go on to the next century?
a) I think the police shouldn’t let robots take over police business because they can get hacked to easily.
b) I think the police shouldn’t let robots take over because it will be too dangerous for the people to walk on the streets in the day and at night.
c) The police should use robots in only very hostile situations so that the public can be safe from it.
d) I think robots should be used only for military because the military know how to use it better.
e) I think the police shouldn’t use robots for their personal well-being in case something goes wrong and in case of an emergency that doesn’t involve guns being shot at
Body Paragraph
Main Idea 1: Why did the police have to use a robot to the gun man
A. Did they have to use it because he was too dangerous to capture on their own?
B. Did the police need to use it because the sniper had eyes everywhere around the hotel he was at?
C. Did the police have use the robot because the sniper was a Marine or a Navy Seal so he was smarter than the police.
D. Did the police use the robot because the sniper was capable of taking on fifty S.W.A.T men coming through the door?
Second concrete idea: My second step did the police think he was a wanted person and want to use the robot right away or see if they could get it done their selves to kill the gun man.
Idea 2: Did the police want to use the robot right away or see if they could do it their selves to kill the gun man?
I. Did they think he was a criminal that was a good shot and too dangerous to get to him by force?
II. Did the police think they were out match by just one guy inside a building?
III. Did the police think they could calm him by negotiating with him to see what is the problem and not use it?
IV. Did the police want to be lazy and get it over with so they could go …show more content…
Did the police want to use the robot because he was still firing shots at police to keep them away?
Third concrete idea: Will the police continue to put robots in the field in very hostile situations or will they use robots to do their handy work for in this time of year and go on to the next century.
Idea 3: Will the police continue to put robots in the field in very hostile situations or will they use robots to do their handy work for in this time of year and go on to the next century?
a) I think the police shouldn’t let robots take over police business because they can get hacked to easily.
b) I think the police shouldn’t let robots take over because it will be too dangerous for the people to walk on the streets in the day and at night.
c) The police should use robots in only very hostile situations so that the public can be safe from it.
d) I think robots should be used only for military because the military know how to use it better.
e) I think the police shouldn’t use robots for their personal well-being in case something goes wrong and in case of an emergency that doesn’t involve guns being shot at