Why Are Farmers Unjustifiable Acts Towards Animals?

Improved Essays
The U.S Justice system and sense of authority is questioned as Carson reports the farmers unjustifiable acts towards animals. Carson describes these animals misery as they were “doomed by a judge and jury” by the farmers. By applying “judge and jury” to animals, Carson personifies them, to reach a sympathetic effect. In our society, we view the death penalty as the pen-ultimate punishment of brutal convictions. However by viewing these animals as humans, the Farmer’s reached this death penalty verdict without reasoning or causality. This would be seen as extremely unreasonable and an abuse of power. On a large, imaginative scale, Carson weighs the use of pesticides vs the death of animals, as she describes it as a “unselective bludgeon of insecticidal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay-2 CHALLENGE FROM MARGINAL CASES Having gone through the ‘Challenge from Marginal Cases: in the Article “Puppies, Pigs and People”, it seems the author Alastair Norcross is of the view that any mutilation or torture to non-human animals is morally impermissible irrespective of the actions of Fred’s behavior and torture of the animals or slaughtering or mutilation of farmed animals. He argues that there is no difference as the animal is mutilated in either case. In one case Fred tortures his puppies directly to obtain cocoamone for his pleasure whereas in other case farmed animals are slaughtered to cater the need of the people. From the above I feel, Fred is a rare consumer of cocoamone and the way he treats or torture puppies himself in an unorganized way and keep animal…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the world, People really do not want to harm others. If farmers realized that deadly pesticides, such as parathion, could hurt people just as easily as the birds and other pests they are trying to put an end to , would they still use them? In this excerpt from Silent Spring, Rachel Carson uses rhetorical devices such as hyperbole, understatement, and rhetorical questions to make the practice of using poisons such as parathion important . Carson starts out by using the symbiotic nature of hyperbole and understatement to reveal the whole practice as overkill. She solidifies her argument by using rhetorical questions to make her readers see the ethical flaws and potential human casualties caused by deadly pesticides.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This except--by Rachel Carson-- was created in order to persuade readers that pesticides are killers, not humans, but to the whole world. Carson does this through an appeal to nature and an appeal to health. Carson evidently cares a lot about nature and her writing supports it. Her appeal to nature approach is very clear s the passage progresses. She addresses the need for change as she talks about the horrible events that occur with the use of pesticides.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Outline About Parathion

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I. Introduction a. Background information parathion and use of pesticides in the 1950-1960s b. Information about the environmental movement that happened after the book was published THESIS: In the excerpt from Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, she states that the use of spraying pesticides is not worth the damage done because of the poison's widespread damage to nature and farmers' ignorance to the dangerous effects parathion has on humans and their worker's lives. II. Body Paragraph 1 a. Carson describes parathion's widespread danger by presenting much of wildlife that was killed as a result of spraying the poison's damage as innocent and describing other deaths as an attempt to change the audience's view to have sympathy for these unintended deaths that do…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout “The Obligation to Endure,” there are several reasonable points Carson makes on the dangers of pesticides. However, she lacks enough credible facts and statistics to back those points up. What little facts she does have are drowned over by her harsh and relentless judgements that make themselves evidently known. Her article’s strength is shown in the amount of emotion she puts in with the tone. So much so that it tend to come off cold and unsettling.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    KPI Princess-Osaani Animal Injustice *Bang Bang * The lion looks behind him, and sees the source of the loud shots. He begins tearing through the wild grasses that slap him in his golden brown muzzle and tickle his brown paws. Heavy steps follow the lion as he begins to put on speed.…

    • 2020 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring is an environmental science handbook whose concern is the environment and life on earth. The author uses her book to turn in to the harmful effects of pesticides on the environment. Rachel mainly handles DDT and pesticides administered to American environment through aerial spraying in attempts to control insect populations over large areas. This paper seeks to summarize Carson’s Silent Spring and capture its informative nature in a global perspective. The essay will also indicate the book's relevance to the chemical industry.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The outrageous forms of brutality inflicted on people should not be repeated but it has not been completely discontinued. Public executions has been changed into a practice that people have foolishly accepted. It is evident in Miller’s essay that he will never understand why society adapts to these kinds of horrendous laws all the name of jus-tice. To this end, public executions will be a new form of contemporary brutality and entertain-ment for the society to…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal rights activists have gained considerable attention in the past few decades through education of the public. The exposure of animal cruelty has led more people to support the need for animal rights. The question now is not whether or not animals deserve rights. Instead, the question is what should those rights be and how far should they extend. A key factor that determines what rights an individual deserves is dignity.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Literary Analysis The corruption inside shows Corrupt people who abuse their power often break their own rules. In the Russian Revolution a man by the name of Stalin assassinates Trotsky and becomes a powerful dictator. When Stalin gains complete control as dictator he abuses much of his power. The abuse of his power leads to many deaths and sufferings.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of Carson's War

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Carson characterizes the farmer’s usage of pesticides as a war waged against nature in order to elicit guilt for society’s mistreatment of nature, rebuking humans for their egocentric actions. She describes how the farmers “engage [spray planes]” on the “roosting sites” of blackbirds, depicting humans as the opponents of nature. In juxtaposing the severity of militaristic weapons with the tender, simplistic image of feeding animals, Carson constructs a battle in which humans have the upper hand, shaming society for their ruthless exploitation of a seemingly weaker force. Carson also exaggerates the malicious intent of the farmers by claiming that the farmers dispatch planes on a “mission of death,” portraying the slaughter of blackbirds as…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Mother's Tale Analysis

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cows, for the most part, have been perceived as innocent creatures throughout the centuries. In various judicial systems, humans, too, are thought to be innocent until proven guilty. As history has shown on many occasions during times of war, innocent people are killed needlessly. In “A Mother’s Tale”, written by James Agee, a mother cow warns her cattle of the gruesome deeds inflicted upon cattle who travel out onto the range through the telling of the tale of the One Who Came Back. The One Who Came Back went through numerous trials, such as the denial of basic necessities and the sensation of being skinned alive, when he was chosen to ‘retire’ on the range.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is only wrong if the hunter is killing the animal as a “just because” reason. It should only be morally acceptable if the hunter is killing the animal for food for survival. Another debatable topic is over whether killing animals should be against the law.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many people concern on what is right and wrong for animal treatment. These arguments are a major issue because many different views and beliefs of people reflect on them. Manly fighting and understanding who has the right over animals is the major concept. Since animals can not speak and choose for their own actions, many people believe that a truthful owner should have the say on what is right for their animal through their beliefs. No matter what regulations are set both sides of the argument will never be satisfied on how humans treat animals.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays