To begin Jay story is not consistent. In episode four they talk about how he was interviewed at least six different times and each time his story shifted. This shows that Jay could be lying and should not be a factor of Adnan's conviction. Looking into the podcast, Sarah says, “In the first taped statement, Jay says he refused to help dig a grave for Hae. Two weeks later, he says they both dug the hole” (Inconsistencies). This inconsistency shows Jay could be lying about something. Meaning Jay should not be a factor of Adnan's conviction. Another piece of evidence that shows Jay is not enough proof to convict Adnan is his story of what happened that day does not fit the call long. The detectives and the people he is working with make his story fit. For example, the Nisha call and the Best buy call. The Nisha call did not fit because that would mean he would have had to have been with Adnan and he would have had to be working at the video store according to what Nisha says. That's not possible because Jay didn't start working at the video store until the end of the month which is after Jan 13, 1999. Another thing is there is no proof that there was a phone booth at the Best Buy in 1999. From this information Jay had many inconsistencies and is not enough proof to convict Adnan. Finally, Jay is not a reliable or trustworthy source. Meaning he should not be a factor of Adnan’s conviction.. To begin with, people knew him as the bad guy he sold weed to young adults still in high school and under the age. Also, why trust a guy's word who tried to hide evidence of him helping Adnan bury the body. To add on to this why trust Jay and not Asia what does Jay have that Asia does not. Asia says she saw him at the library that day and she gives the same specific details of why she remembers that day. Unlike Jay he says he knew Adnan did it, but as he tells his story
To begin Jay story is not consistent. In episode four they talk about how he was interviewed at least six different times and each time his story shifted. This shows that Jay could be lying and should not be a factor of Adnan's conviction. Looking into the podcast, Sarah says, “In the first taped statement, Jay says he refused to help dig a grave for Hae. Two weeks later, he says they both dug the hole” (Inconsistencies). This inconsistency shows Jay could be lying about something. Meaning Jay should not be a factor of Adnan's conviction. Another piece of evidence that shows Jay is not enough proof to convict Adnan is his story of what happened that day does not fit the call long. The detectives and the people he is working with make his story fit. For example, the Nisha call and the Best buy call. The Nisha call did not fit because that would mean he would have had to have been with Adnan and he would have had to be working at the video store according to what Nisha says. That's not possible because Jay didn't start working at the video store until the end of the month which is after Jan 13, 1999. Another thing is there is no proof that there was a phone booth at the Best Buy in 1999. From this information Jay had many inconsistencies and is not enough proof to convict Adnan. Finally, Jay is not a reliable or trustworthy source. Meaning he should not be a factor of Adnan’s conviction.. To begin with, people knew him as the bad guy he sold weed to young adults still in high school and under the age. Also, why trust a guy's word who tried to hide evidence of him helping Adnan bury the body. To add on to this why trust Jay and not Asia what does Jay have that Asia does not. Asia says she saw him at the library that day and she gives the same specific details of why she remembers that day. Unlike Jay he says he knew Adnan did it, but as he tells his story