Who Was Responsible For 9/11 Destruction

“Over 3,000 people were killed during the attack”.(History.com) The 11th of september 2001, an attack in the United states by a group of terrorist in al Quaeda highjacked 4 different airlines. The government was not behind the attacks even though the collapse of the WTC building 7 was mysterious, it looked like there was use of explosives and jet fuel isn’t able to melt steel beams. First , the collapse of the World Trade Center building 7 caused the theory that the government was responsible for the attacks because the destruction was mysterious. Many people think that the government planted explosives in the building; however, the main cause of the destruction was the Boeing-757 that hit the building directly, “along with debris from …show more content…
The impact of the plane hitting the twin towers created a sort of explosion, but it was not done by a bomb. To elaborate, “the impact created a sort of pancake effect, pressurized air from the falling floors and debris caused the windows the shatter and allow wreckage to be blown out the building creating the puffs.”(History rundown) Although it may have looked like there was the use of explosives in the destruction, the pressure of the collapse was enough to cause even more. While the first floor lost it’s support from the impact of the plane, the more the levels fell, the more the weight would have been to bear for the lower floors, causing more pressure. “The pulverized concrete was blown out the windows from the air being blown around and from the air leaving the newly opened windows.” The puffs of dust escaping the windows making the image of the use of explosions was simply the concrete coming out of the holes in the side of the building with the force of the pressurized air. Once again proving that the attacks of September 11th were not by the government, but by the 19 milliants from al-Quaeda. Finally, the amount of jet fuel that was leaked from the planes caused weakness in the structural support. “What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete sags” (Vincent Dunn).What Vincent is explaining is that, the heat from the burning fuel will not melt the steel beams completely but will get them weak enough to the point that the structure of the buillding will no longer be able to support and it will end up collapsing. “The average heat that is needed