Who Killed Julius Caesar Case Study

Improved Essays
In the novel, Julius Caesar there is a two sided argument on how and why Caesar was murdered. Even though Caesar is Brutus’ best friend, for the sake of Rome, with no regrets or grief, Brutus murdered Caesar. In Brutus’ mind, the best for Rome was to annihilate Caesar. When Mark Antony finds out that Caesar was put to death, he asks Brutus if he can deliver a speech at his funeral. Brutus grants Antony his wish and lets him speak. Little did he know that Anthony had a proposal to turn everybody against him. Brutus was telling them that Caesar was gonna make them slaves again and that he was ambitious. However when Antony starts to speak, he changes the minds of everybody. Antony tells the truth of Caesar and the things he knew, not his opinion. …show more content…
Basically saying what Brutus has done, he will have to live with it for the rest of his life. Throughout his speech he talks about how they are all honourable to come out and speak so that they don 't think he is there to do harm to them. He says Brutus is an honourable man, although asks how is he so honourable when he says Caesar was ambitious. Even though, he truly wasn’t ambitious at all. “He was my friend, faithful and just to me: But Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honourable man.” (2.1-3). He then talks about how Caesar helped the poor when they cried for help. “When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff: Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honourable man.”(2.7-10). He calls Brutus an honourable man again to show the crowd that he is a liar and truly not honourable. Antony also supports his reasoning for Caesar, not being ambitious by telling the listeners that when he offered the crown to him three different times he refused it. “You all did see the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: was the ambition?”(3.1-3). Antony again says that Brutus is an honourable man, but he does not speak to disprove what Brutus said, but he 's there speaking of what he knows. In Brutus’ speech he has nothing to say about Caesar, he just talks about himself, apologizes to the crowd if he has ever …show more content…
He uses pathos again with when he says “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And i must pause till it come back to me.” (4.34-35). Antony gets choked up and teary eyed when talking about Caesar. “Poor soul! His eyes are red as fire with weeping.” (6.44). This is when the crowd now believes in him. Getting close to the end of his speech, he reveals a parchment that he found in Caesar’s closet, which happens to be his will. He doesn’t mean to read his will but he lets the crowd hear a small portion of it. “Which, pardon me, I do not mean to read--And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood…”(8.61-62). The crowd begs to hear the will shouting “The will, the will! We will hear Caesar’s will.” (9.68). But with the great respect he has for Caesar, he does not read it to them and tells the that they are mean and do not need to hear it because it will inflame them knowing what Caesar has wrote. “You are not wood, you are not stones, but men; And, being men, bearing the will of Caesar, It will inflame you, it will make you mad.”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech was based on the use of pathos. He mentioned the will of Caesar but then told the people, “It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you” (Anderson 840). The people did not realize that he was manipulating them into demanding to hear the will. His speech was filled with emotional appeals and veiled calls to action such as this. At one point in his speech, he crooned, “Good friends, sweet friends, let me not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny” (Anderson 838).…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Suggested Score 80% Accept Suggested Score Manual Score: Manual Score Prompt Rubric | Checklist Two Julius Caesar Speeches Brutus and Mark Antony both delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar. How do these speeches relate to the conclusion of the play?…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus delivers a speech defending his actions, and for the moment, the crowd is on his side. However, Mark Antony, with a subtle and eloquent speech, deftly turns public opinion against the assassins by manipulating the emotions of the common people. There is method in his rhetorical speech and gestures: he reminds them of the good Caesar had done for Rome, his sympathy with the poor, and his refusal of the crown at the Lupercal, thus questioning Brutus' claim of Caesar's ambition. He shows Caesar's corpse to the crowd to have them shed tears and gain sympathy for their fallen hero; and he reads Caesar's will, in which every Roman citizen would receive money. Antony rouses the mob to drive the conspirators from Rome.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While justifying his reasons for the speech, that he “[isn’t speaking] to disprove what Brutus spoke” but rather “speaks what he knows,” Antony uses verbal irony. The statement contains irony because he says that he speaks not to disprove Brutus, however he did the opposite by the claims against the Conspirators. Using the irony as bait to draw in the citizens, Antony builds on his tone of manipulation. The irony makes him appear as a good guy, that does not speak out against others, so the people respect him differently. He manipulates them into listening to the rest of the words he must say.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He started off using pathos by saying, “not that i loved Caesar less but that i loved Rome more. ”(III.2.23-24). This wins over the crowd because it shows that because he loves them he was protecting them. He then uses logos by asking “who here is so rude that they not be a Roman?”(III.2.32-33). This is using the logic that everyone in the crowd is a proud Roman and if they are all proud Romans than they should rather have Caesar dead than alive.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “People are usually more convinced by reasons they discovered themselves than by those found out by others.” This quote by French philosopher Blaise Pascal explains the success of any good speaker. They have the ability to make the audience adopt the ideas as their own. In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, this remains true. Julius Caesar is murdered by conspirators who claim to be his friend.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power is one of the most desirable things in life. Everyone longs for it. However, power can be very dangerous. Julius Caesar shows this by conveying a theme that power can be deadly to those who are not careful. The first example of this is that Caesar is in a position of power and ends up being killed because of it.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus recites a speech in the market place after Caesar’s death the speeches exemplify parallelism, verbal irony, and witty use of rhetoric. With the Roman public watching on eager to see a reprisal for the death of Caesar, Brutus uses the undetected technique of coercion on the Romans taking advantage of their easily susceptible minds. In his speech he proclaims his love for Caesar passionately stating “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”. With the public making up their minds, Brutus plays his pathos card, showing he really did care for Caesar but claims, “Have you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” .Here…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first place, Antony states, “You will compel me, than, to read the will” (3.2)? Similarly, Antony wanted to trick the crowd into keeping him longer. In other words, Antony planned to mention to the crowd that he had Caesar’s will, but would then subtly put it away. Once Antony had changed the subject, he would use the persuasive technique of Pathos and change their emotions to cause the crowd to feel eager about hearing what Caesar had left them all in his will. Another key point was when Antony said, “Alas, you know not: I must tell you then: You have forgot the will I told you of” (3.2).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He reminded the people that Caesar would have ruined Rome, become a tyrant and would have enslaved everyone, he said "had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead?". He says this as a rhetorical question: it has quite an obvious answer but probably would have been false anyway. Brutus says that last quote like it is fact and that it will happen. The fact makes it seem more real.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare’s political play Julius Caesar is one in which its namesake, Caesar, is murdered by a group of conspirators. Following this, Brutus attempts to persuade the audience that he acted for the best interest of Rome, claiming that Caesar would have become a dictator. However, the commoners of Rome were never satisfied with the reasoning for Caesar’s death. This was caused due to multiple reasons, mainly which they had already established their support for Caesar and Brutus’ inadequate speech which fails to justify his actions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brutus is explaining to the audience that in the past the people of Rome had dictators and disaster struck. He promises that he will try his best to never let this happen to the people of Rome again...even if it means killing Caesar. Brutus again shows his nobility to Rome at the end of Act IV. Brutus, who was unaware until later of the conspirators’ reasons to kill Caesar, has a dream where the ghost of Caesar visits him. After the ghost tells Brutus that they will meet again at Philippi, Brutus says,”Why, I will see thee at Philippi, then./…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Any effective argument is guaranteed to have some form of rhetoric in order to push the persuasive agenda of the author. One such example of this is in Brutus’ speech after Julius Caesar’s death when he expressed his thoughts toward Caesar, but in doing so induced slight logical fallacies. However, he continued to effectively use rhetoric to persuade the people that Julius’ death was for the good of Rome. Brutus’ claim is that he killed Julius Caesar for the good of Rome.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Specifically, Marc Antony inquires the audience if they want him to read Caesar’s will and to encircle Caesar’s corpse (III. ii. 157-159). This query, however, lacks legitimate curiosity as Antony recognizes his plan already, yet it prevents accusations that Antony forced his ideas upon the crowd. Likewise, Antony manages the rhetorical device to push his audience in his direction by saying that he holds no power at all to influence people (III. ii. 221-223).…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On March 15, 44 BC, Brutus killed Julius Caesar for the freedom and protection of Rome. According to Brutus he says, “I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honor him but as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (ll. 26-27). Another reason as to why he killed him was his ambition. Perhaps Brutus thought that Caesar had too much ambition.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays