Who Is Rene Descartes Deceive The Existence Of God?

Improved Essays
Rene Descartes was one of the famous mathematicians and philosophers. Descartes was considered the “father of modern philosophy.” (1) He was born in France in the sixteenth century. He got his education in France. Besides his many accomplishments in mathematics, he discovered “analytic geometry” (2) with a contribution from Galileo. In philosophy, he used suspicion and reason to find the truths. He used this technique to make philosophy as strong as the mathematics. His technique made him never accept any ideas that he thought it is uncertain. His process led him to think about himself, his sense, his body, and his mind. Therefore, this suspicions made him to doubt about the existence of the God, who acts in Descartes technique as a warrantor …show more content…
He is trying to connect his proofs of a God’s existence with human errors, and how his proofs led him to clarify the human errors. In his two proofs, Descartes knows that the God cannot deceive him because he is a perfect being while deception is compatible with imperfect being. Also, Descartes mentions at the beginning of his meditation it is impossible that the God would deceive him. He admits, “I acknowledge that it is impossible for the God ever to deceive me, for trickery or deception is always indicative of some imperfection”(5). Descartes states in the first proof, he was imperfect being. Therefore, he makes errors. Descartes says he would not blame the God for these errors because the God is not responsible for it. Descartes explains why human being make mistakes as he says “I note that these errors depend on the simultaneous concurrence of two causes: the faculty of knowing that is for me and the faculty of choosing, that is, the free choice of the will, in other words, simultaneous on the intellect and will.”(6) He clarifies the intellect as the faculty of knowing which is limited in the way of thinking and understanding, and the will as the faculty of choosing which is unlimited and powerful as he gained it from the God. His will allows him to accept or deny ideas. Descartes believes as long as he receives the will from the God, so it is not responsible for his errors; However, the will is unlimited, it may allow the person to agree on the incorrect thoughts. The will don’t allow the person to understand while intellect does. This big difference between the intellect and the will can cause the human mistakes. These differences allow the human to make an incorrect judge on the matters that they do not know its origin. It seems to them it is true while it is false because the will and intellect are incompatible with each

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Descartes prefers creating new concepts rather than building knowledge on old philosophies: “To reach certainty- to cast aside the loose earth and sand so as to come upon rock and clay”-He said. Descartes argues that, he needs to think and experience himself to confirm a scientific truth. To even establish a sturdier foundation and seek further knowledge, he looks for reasons to doubt his own opinion. If there is doubt about the basic principles of his opinions, he will doubt his other opinions.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes attempts to reconcile a Christian metaphysics with a new epistemology contrary to the scholastic, Aristotelian worldview. He seeks new foundations that knowledge can be built upon and tries to accomplish this by identifying basic, indubitable axioms to derive more complex truths by. As Descartes had a background in mathematics and geometry, these tenets are proposed alike mathematical truths in that they are self-evidential. He calls these axioms ,”clear and distinct perceptions”. For the Cartesian epistemology and metaphysics to be plausible, these perceptions must be not only epistemologically privileged, but also universal and justifiable as mathematical truths are, in terms of semantics and self-evidentiality.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of Descartes’ argument of doubt is to encourage us to doubt the truth in everything. Some would argue that the doubt argument is not valid because its conclusion does not follow its premises. While this is a strong observation, it overlooks the three arguments Descartes’ used to strengthen his premise on doubt - perceptual illusion, the dream problem, and a deceiving god. In the first case, perceptual illusion illustrates that things are not always just as they seem and since we cannot all be sure about what is true and what is not, it is our best interest to doubt any sensory knowledge. The dream problem claims that it is possible to doubt any physical thing actually exists and that there is an external world.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God. I think that the argument he gives for the existence of God is valid, yet I find it to be unsound due to the fact that a few of his premises are can easily be doubted. In order to express this opinion, I will first provide explanations of the premises and…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes was a French philosopher who is considered today as the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. Descartes often fought with the idea of this thing called Skepticism, which is the philosophical position that knowledge is impossible. This did not sit well with Descartes so he decided to write a book called “The Meditations on First Philosophy” as a guide book to the truth. Descartes’ two main aims with this book were first, to address and defeat skepticism, and second, to attain perfect knowledge, which is knowledge that is absolutely certain and indubitable; he aimed to used this idea of perfect knowledge to defeat skepticism. One of the first things Descartes had to do in order to defeat skepticism was look at his own beliefs and doubt all…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a result of doing so, Descartes was able to rebuild his beliefs on the foundation of this things that he knew for certain was true. Descartes believed that trying to debunk all of his beliefs would be tedious so instead, he concluded that all of this beliefs came from the senses. He also concluded that the senses sometimes deceive us, thus they have a possibility of being false. Descartes does not argue that because we are sometimes fooled by the senses that we are always fooled by them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes may not be able to know the truth, but this will allow him to not fall for what is false. In his second meditation, Descartes expresses that everything he sees is not real and that his memories, senses, or physical surroundings cannot be trusted. For a moment, Descartes doubts his own existence, questioning whether it is he who controls his own thoughts or if it is a higher power, God, who has control over him. Descartes also denies the notion of body, sense, and mind; he almost denies his entire existence but resolves this statement by saying that if an evil demon is trying to deceive him then…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes’s mission in the meditations was to doubt everything and that what remained from his doubting could be considered the truth. This lead Descartes to argue for the existence of God. For the purpose of this paper, I will first discuss Descartes’s argument for the existence of God within the third and fifth meditations. I will then take issue with three of Descartes arguments. Descartes argues that some ideas are more real than others.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to do this he uses what is referred to as the method of doubt. (Broughton, 2003) Descartes’ method of doubt is to analyse and reject every belief that it is possible to cast the slightest of doubt upon. This method was not to look at every belief separately but to look at…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He decides to dump everything he thought was true and start over. Everything he admits has the least bit of doubt should be declared as completely false. If there is someone who instills thoughts in him, who thought of someone instilling thoughts in him? He wonders if he is the author of these thoughts. Descartes also persuaded himself there was nothing in the world, including the sky, the earth, minds, bodies, and even…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the beginning of his fourth meditation, Descartes begins reflecting on the three main certainties that he has developed so far: 1) that God exists, 2) that God is not a deceiver, and 3) that God created him and is therefore responsible for all his faculties, including his faculty of judgment. Descartes seems satisfied with the first two convictions, however, he begins to explore the conflict that arises with the third; that, “if everything that is in me comes from God, and he did not endow me with a faculty for making mistakes, it appears that I can never go wrong” (Descartes and Cottingham 38). This dilemma, also known as the “Problem of Error”, prompts the need for Descartes to reconcile the two, seemingly contradictory positions. While…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believes that, “[he] has no cause for complaint on the grounds that God has not given me a greater power of understanding or a greater light of nature than he has, for it is the essence of a finite intellect, not to understand many things, and is of the essence of a created intellect to be finite” (Cress 40). Here Descartes is saying that while our will and free choice is infinite, our intellect is finite. Human beings are not able to comprehend all that we are able to do, and as a result, we will pass judgement on things that he does not fully understand. Our will has a tendency to surpass our intellect which causes us to make errors. Descartes believes that, “if I hold off from making a judgement when I do not perceive what is true with sufficient clarity and distinctness, it is clear that I am acting properly and am not committing an error”…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays