Who Is John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism

Decent Essays
1. Bentham believed that happiness is pleasure and pleasure is the highest good in life, and that an action is right if causes the greatest pleasure for somebody. I think Utilitarianism means whether or not an action will cause pleasure or pain. The best example that I can remembered it is to kill the fat man or save five lives? I will save the five people because I am going to minimized the pain of five families instead of one. I think he focused here in quantity of people that I am going to save and not in the quality of the people that are tie in the tract of the train.

2. Mill also thinks that an action is right so far as it brings the great amount of pleasure to people and also believe that we need to know how to behave according to benefits of society instead of thinking on ourselves. The higher and lower pleasure that’s the only thing that differ from Bentham. He argues that only those who have experienced both pleasure and pain know that happiness is often difficult, and that pain sometimes is inevitable.
…show more content…
Sidgwick believes that happiness or pleasure are not the only things that each man actually desires for himself, that’s how the reject Mill, he believed that the fact that we desire or wish something doesn’t mean anything to him. He believed that utilitarianism seeks to contribute to the happiness of all persons affected by the act and indicated that ends other than happiness might be acceptable, and that guidelines other than those that promote happiness might be suitable means to an end. Sidgwick argued that neither the first nor the last could, by itself, supply an adequate basis for rational

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill defines utilitarianism as “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (484) He then begins to explain that happiness is the absence of pain, and pain is the absence of pleasure. He refers to utilitarianism as the Greatest Happiness Principle. Many people that disagreed with Mill’s definition of utilitarianism insulted his work by stating it as a “doctrine worthy only of swine,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this attack by stating “...for if the sources of pleasure were precisely the same to human beings and to swine, the rule of which is good enough for the one would be good enough for the other,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this insult by comparing human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Bentham, the consequentialist principle states that the rightness of an act is defined by the goodness of the results, and the hedonist principle states that an act is right if it brings pleasure and prevents pain. Hedonism specifies that pleasure is the ultimate, highest good. Therefore, it is the end goal. In Bentham’s view of utilitarianism, the “pig philosophy” argues that the end result justifies the mean because “a pig enjoying his life would constitute a higher moral state than a slightly dissatisfied Socrates” (Pojman and Fieser 97). Meanwhile, Mill explains that eudaimonistic utilitarianism captures happiness through higher- and lower-order pleasures.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What matters the most to Mill is that a greater number of are collectively happy. Therefore, the unhappy person would have to sacrifice their own happiness so everyone else can achieve it. Mill also believes that there is no such thing as true happiness because happiness cannot be achieved without a little pain. However, one of the most important parts of his book is when he advocates for expediency. This part of…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are also many conflicting situations that people face since their judgments of pleasure are different. This disprove Mill’s argument that pleasure’s quality is one of the main part of moral actions. His logic of high quality pleasure is hard to prove since everyone’s happiness is different. A result might have different meanings to varied people, so it is hard to find the sum of happiness. Morality is balanced to people’s true happiness, but not based on the sum of…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill's Moral Theory

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    J.S. Mill’s Moral Theory Ernest Cabrera PHI-305 March 6, 2016 Grand Canyon University J.S. MIll’s Moral Theory Right or Wrong? This is something as humans that we struggle with every day, with utilitarianism it is the same thing. We struggle with making the morally right decision and try to base it around the right or wrongs.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans attribute value to objects. Bentham tries to find what humans value fundamentally in a manner similar to the first cause argument. Through this process he deduces that humans fundamentally value pleasure, along with the avoidance of pain. The reason pleasure was the ultimate conclusion is that pleasure cannot be traded away. Bentham is a utilitarian, so he believes in the meaning of the consequences rather than the meaning of the actions.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is based on the Utilitarian principle that one should act towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This promotes happiness and pleasure while condemning anything that causes pain. Mill believes that the purpose for any person’s actions is to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Though this ultimate telos for happiness may seem like a good system, there are flaws that do not coincide with human nature. One issue with this theory is that it does not take into consideration that different people have different preferences and ideas of what is pleasurable.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bentham's Utilitarianism

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a theory produced by English philosopher Jeremy Bentham. “Utilitarianism affirms the principle that the right action is the one that directly produces the best balance of happiness over unhappiness for all concerned” (Beginning Ethics). Bentham defined happiness is to be anything that causes pleasure and unhappiness is to be anything that causes pain. Bentham’s theory on utilitarianism is highly influential; John Stuart Mill, an English philosopher and economist, later developed Bentham’s moral theories on utilitarianism farther. Mill formed his ideas based off of Bentham’s theory.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In utilitarianism, the line between pragmatism and morality is nonexistent as it asks individuals to consider themselves a part of a whole so they can act solely to benefit the larger unit. Essentially, Bentham's model determines whether an action is right or wrong based on the net amount of pleasure or pain it causes the involved parties. Furthermore, he specifies the various qualities that determine the value of the subsequent pleasure or pain, breaking them into seven categories that range from intensity to purity. However, with this model, Bentham makes some assumptions about the model's implementation, which causes problems in every day applications. In particular, the consideration of pleasure and pain of those beyond the individual presents…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues that consequences of an action are all that really matter. Defining utilitarianism at its core, is a theory holding that the moral rightness and/or wrongness of an action depends entirely on the consequences of that action. Thereby agreeing that an action or decision is considered good if it generates happiness and bad if it generates the reverse. In his ethical approach, Mill suggests that the measure of success and happiness depends on how many people and how much happiness was developed as a result of that action, or the “greatest happiness principle.” This principle, Mill declares, “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brandon Balsirow Word Count: Title Here Attack or defend the principle of utility. Does it define right and wrong, good and evil? The principle of utility is insufficient to define right and wrong, or good and evil.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill bases his theory in human psychology, saying that desire is universal regardless of one’s religious convictions. He also recognizes that human pleasures differ in quality, not just quantity (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). Mill believed that human higher desires are those of reason and intellect while the lower desires are based on our immediate and biological needs and wants. Mill found that it is impossible to quantify lower desires because they are innate and natural. Some strengths of qualitative utilitarianism are that it does take into account natural human desires and gives them weight in order to help make an ethical decision (Wilkens, 2011).…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why Should We Be Moral?

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bentham was a Act-Utilitarian and Mill was an Rule-Utilitarian. Bentham’s one principle is to maximize pleasure and minimize pain. We point out what we ought to do as well as what we shall do. An act is right if we bring more pleasure than pain and an act is wrong if we bring more pain than…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays