Traditionally we call these properties, they're not the apple itself, but simply the features of the apple is in which the apple projects itself into the world. For Hume's bundle theory, there is no actual apple underneath it all, only the properties exist and he defended this by daring you to imagine an object without properties, strip the apple of its properties and you wind up reducing it to literal non-existence. Some people make the inaccurate mistake of thinking that Hume meant that you don't exist, he did deny self though. He said one exists as a bundle of qualities, that's
Traditionally we call these properties, they're not the apple itself, but simply the features of the apple is in which the apple projects itself into the world. For Hume's bundle theory, there is no actual apple underneath it all, only the properties exist and he defended this by daring you to imagine an object without properties, strip the apple of its properties and you wind up reducing it to literal non-existence. Some people make the inaccurate mistake of thinking that Hume meant that you don't exist, he did deny self though. He said one exists as a bundle of qualities, that's