Whistleblowing In The Film Mr. Smith Goes To Washington

Improved Essays
During the screening of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, many ideas were presented that are vital to present day America. One idea that is particularly relevant to both the movement of the plot and modern day America is whistleblowing. Whistleblowing, or the disclosure of information by a person or agency that may be illegal, corrupt, or tarnish reputations, is directly related to democracy and freedom of speech (Whistleblowing). Additionally, whistleblowing plays a critical role in the film as well, introducing conflict throughout the film. While the film was created in the 1930s, the ideas presented remain both culturally and politically relevant to contemporary America (Mr. Smith). Modern day whistleblowing has begun a dialogue about critical issues within the political sphere that would have otherwise not occurred. …show more content…
In present day America, whistleblowing is a crucial aspect of healthy democracy. Democracy relies on checks and balances to prevent corruption within governmental process. Whistleblowing acts as a check and balance, as it can allow for people within to release unlawful and undemocratic practices by politicians to the public without punishment. Furthermore, whistleblowing can reveal corruption and illegality within important political entities and powerful mega businesses. Additionally, the checks and balances between the branches of government act as whistleblowing mechanisms, as the branches can disclose and prevent illegality, or other wrongdoings within the other branches. Along with whistleblowing relating to democracy, the idea relates to freedom of speech. Whistleblowing relates to freedom of speech in the way that whistleblowing is the exercise of individuals their freedoms. Freedom of speech allows for whistleblowing to occur within a government or society. Without this freedom of speech, whistleblowing would be less likely to occur within a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In her article "Shooting the messenger: Why Canadians don't blow the whistle on wrongdoing" Suanne Kelman aims to unravel the Canadian stigma regarding whistleblowers. Last year, when Wikileaks declassified a large quantity of corrupt government documents, the general canadian's reaction was not one of solidarity, but rather of condemnation. Kelman believes that, "somewhere in the Canadian psyche there seems to be a rooted belief that whistleblowing is not nice"(200). This explains why the canadian discussion tends to revolve more around the founder of Wikileaks' character, rather than the issue of transparency itself. It is not as if there are no cases of government corruption in canada.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dog Whistle Politics is one of most well written books which have effectively managed to bring out the theme of racism by giving a detailed analysis of the subject. This book was written by Haney-López, Ian. Haney-López is one of the distinguished writers of his time who also happens to be Law professor at the University of California. In most of his publications, he has certainly been able to explain the link between wealth inequality in the American society and racial divisions that exist in the country. He has also managed to explain how the conservative politicians have managed to rely on this racial pandering to convince many voters to vote for them.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the progressive era, muckrakers were the “voice’ of the unspoken. They spread all of the bad information throught America, most of their content came from factories, political corruption in city machines, and the financial deceit of coporations. They were, “journalists, novelists, professors, and public intellectuals.” (BOOK) The name “Muckrakers, came from the term Pilgrim’s Progress, in which a rake was used to dig up filth and muck.”(WEBSITE)…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamilton-Burr Duel

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The documentary tells the tales of the lives of Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr, both leading serendipitously parallel lives yet still incredibly different people, and their influence on the creation of American politics. Hamilton, a foreign-born Federalist notable for his fiery writings, and Burr, the Republican man known then as “America’s First Gentleman”, were originally close acquaintances, or perhaps more seeing as the terms of their relationship are not entirely known. However, over the years, there was a darker turn on their intertwined paths, leading to the now infamous Hamilton-Burr Duel (Duel: Hamilton vs. Burr). Under Washington’s presidency, in 1788, Hamilton becomes the Secretary of the Treasury, as Hamilton was born in the…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Definitions Corporate Accountability- When you have to be responsible for your stakeholders Fraud- A criminal acts to achieve more money Whistleblower- A person who knows that the company has been doing illegal acts and decides to tell the government. Canadian Tire Reflecting on Canadian Tire’s Code of Conduct…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a 1906 speech, during the time known as the Progressive Era, President Theodore Roosevelt warned the American people against muckrakers. Roosevelt expressed his negative feelings towards newspapers, magazines, and books that attacked public figures with insults and lies. In summary, his speech declared that it is good for reporters to state the bad things that bad people did in the government. However, there are many muckrakers who lied about government and corporate figures for good publicity. Muckrakers made the bad people that they were look good, and the good people in the government look bad.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mr. Smith Goes to Washington; a film by Frank Capra, this is a film about a man who has never served or been in political office in his life, comes to Washington D.C. to serve out the term for a Senator, who died. However; the men who appointed him, wanted someone they could have control over, and have him vote for their interests. Jefferson Smith is a man who very idealistic about what the government should stand for and do for its people. He also has his secretary Ms. Saunders to learn about how the process of how a bill gets voted on. While, serving in Congress; he doesn’t become corrupt and keeps the qualities that he had beforehand that endeared people to him.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Clooney’s Good Night, and Good Luck (2005) is a huge alert and warning to todays post terrorist attack (of the Twin Towers in 2001) society, in which civil liberties and human rights of each and any person can slip away as an effect of mass hysteria. The core of Clooney’s approach is the idea that sometimes journalists need to go beyond simple and exact reporting and offer some more in-depth interpretations on current affairs. He stresses the tensions caused by post-war paranoia and threats made against a country through his portrayal of the acting and characterisations, editing, sound, lighting and framing (Caulfield, 2007). Good Night, and Good Luck cleverly displays and educates the audience of the era of McCarthyism. George Clooney…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Muckraker” is a word usually associated with the Progressive time period when discussing American history. The Progressive era was a time of widespread social, political, and economic reformation which took place in the United States. Before the public could be awakened to action, it first had to be enlightened on the scandalous realities of factories, politics, and slums. Muckraking exposed iniquities, educated the public about corruption in high places, and prepared the way for corrective action.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Freedom of Speech? The Merriam-Webster dictionary define freedom of speech as “the right to express facts and opinions subject only to reasonable limitations (as the power of the government to protect itself from a clear and present danger) guaranteed by the 1st and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution and similar provisions of some state constitutions”. Freedom of speech is ones right to say what you please without fear of being punished, is among one of the most treasured freedoms throughout America. The founders of the United States government tried to protect our liberty by assuring a free press, to gather and publish information without being under control or power of another, in the First Amendment to the Constitution. As we know, the Supreme Court plays an important role in the subject of free speech and expression, and we need to understand that…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As reported by Paranormal Crucible on Youtube, three important whistleblowers formerly of the U.S Army have come forth confirming alien capture. While the lack of any scientific evidence doesn't exactly help their case, their claims bring the controversial existence of aliens to the forefront. U.S ARMY SERGEANT CONFIRMS ALIEN COVERUP Sgt. Clifford Stone has recently come forth confirming that on more than one occasion, the U.S Army captured aliens.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Muckrakers are necessary for a more democratic and ethical…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smith’s Urgent Declaration Throughout the 1950’s, a Red Scare movement caused mass panic among Americans, led by the Senate accusing innocent citizens of supporting communism, which ruined the careers and lives of many. The Republican minority attacked the Democratic administration during this movement, criticizing the government for its lack of strong leadership. In her “Declaration of Conscience,” Margaret Chase Smith pressures the current administration to improve its leadership through the use of emotional appeals, anaphora, and ethos. Firstly, Smith employs emotional appeals in order to motivate the American people to urge the Democratic leaders to change.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was met when David discuss this with his superiors, like Diane and Phil, about the situation. Thirdly, they exhaust the channels available within their organization after getting no satisfaction from their superiors. This was met when Diane and Phil denied David’s request of upgrading the water treatment plant when he heard of the anticipated growth in production and had no one else to go to. Under these circumstances, whistleblowing is morally…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keynote speaker, Clint Smith speaks on the “Dangers of Silence” through the reflection of his own failures to tell the basic, everyday truth. When we hear the word danger, we typically think straight of the actions committed by others that are grave and deadly. Mr. Smith, a writer, and teacher brought an entirely new meaning to the meaning of silence. Clint states that the pure act of silence being recognized as serene causes more danger than any good. He teaches the audience that when we are dealing with controversial issues that demand action from the public, we divert ourselves to keep hushed and automatically become muted in order to avoid the issue at hand.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays