Eventually, the criminals were figured out and caught. Due to security cameras in the bank their crime was captured on film. Douglas O. Linder explains how they were caught by the security camera in Patty Hearst Trial (1976). The criminals were caught by a security camera in the bank. After figuring out who was part of the crime some were caught specifically Patricia Heart a few months after the crime. (Linder, Patty Hearst Trial 1976) John Greenya described how Patricia was captured after analyzing tapes of bank robbery to say it was her committing the crime in When Patty Hearst Met Revolution. Patricia Hearst and Wendy Yoshimura were captured September 18, 1975 in San Francisco, after a year of no communication from Hearst. (Greenya) These
…show more content…
The legal proceedings were held in the court of the U.S district in California. The author, wrote in the Patty Hearst Trial (1976) the location of where Patty Hearst finally was questioned. The trial was held in the courtroom of the Oliver J. Carter the judge in the U.S District. (Linder, Patty Hearst Trial 1976) In this trial the defense lawyer was F. Lee Bailey and the plaintiff’s lawyer is Robert R. Browning. Bailey had a distinct purpose for Patricia’s unruly change of person. In When Patty Hearst Met the Revolution the author John Greenya describes Bailey’s core reasoning. In the case the defense’s claim was that what she had done was under fear and brainwashing. (Greenya) The verdict was that Patricia Hearst was guilty of a bank robbery. John Greenya in When Patty Hearst Met the Revolution, he tells the punishment for Patty Hearst of her five-week long trial. Her final sentence of the court was to be sentenced seven years in prison due to being guilty of a bank robbery. (Greenya) Due to her crime she was sentenced to seven years in prison. The lawyer and author, Douglas Linder, explained Patty’s release and how it was shortened. For example, after serving only a year and ten months she was commuted by president Carter. Then got a full pardon in 2001 by Clinton. (Linder, Patty Hearst Trial 1976) All of these aspects of her reasoning and her sentence explain subtly that even though she did get off early Patty should have served
The legal proceedings were held in the court of the U.S district in California. The author, wrote in the Patty Hearst Trial (1976) the location of where Patty Hearst finally was questioned. The trial was held in the courtroom of the Oliver J. Carter the judge in the U.S District. (Linder, Patty Hearst Trial 1976) In this trial the defense lawyer was F. Lee Bailey and the plaintiff’s lawyer is Robert R. Browning. Bailey had a distinct purpose for Patricia’s unruly change of person. In When Patty Hearst Met the Revolution the author John Greenya describes Bailey’s core reasoning. In the case the defense’s claim was that what she had done was under fear and brainwashing. (Greenya) The verdict was that Patricia Hearst was guilty of a bank robbery. John Greenya in When Patty Hearst Met the Revolution, he tells the punishment for Patty Hearst of her five-week long trial. Her final sentence of the court was to be sentenced seven years in prison due to being guilty of a bank robbery. (Greenya) Due to her crime she was sentenced to seven years in prison. The lawyer and author, Douglas Linder, explained Patty’s release and how it was shortened. For example, after serving only a year and ten months she was commuted by president Carter. Then got a full pardon in 2001 by Clinton. (Linder, Patty Hearst Trial 1976) All of these aspects of her reasoning and her sentence explain subtly that even though she did get off early Patty should have served