Whe When Perna Case Study

Improved Essays
On May 8th 1977, Thomas Perna entered his local hospital after being guided there by his family doctor. He was going to have some urological tests done with a specialist by the name of Dr. Pirozzi. Perna had kidney stones, which is when a large calcium buildup with sharp edges tries to pass through a person’s small intestines. It is a very painful condition to have, and can lead to a lot of complications of the intestines. However, Dr. Pirozzi was part of a special medical group that commonly shared patients. All of members of that group knew of all the cases the others had, there was no case that belonged specifically to a particular person in the group. This lead to the possibility of you going into surgery thinking you would be operated on by one person, but then another enters the room. …show more content…
After the surgery however, Perna had to be readmitted to the hospital due to some complications that occurred during the surgery. Upon being readmitted, he learned that the doctor he thought was the one who performed the operation, was not the one who did it. Mr. Perna then filed a suit along with his wife for malpractice against all three of the doctors on the team. They filed four deviations from the standard medical procedures.
While yes, Mr. Perna did sign a medical consent form, the doctor who actually performed the surgery was not on the consent form. Therefore, it was an unauthorized invasion of Perna’s body, also known as battery.
In the long run, the court sided with Perna because whether or not the procedure was done correctly, it was done without the true consent of the patient. By allowing the other surgeon to perform the surgery instead of himself, Dr. Pirozzi was going against the true wishes of the patient. He let someone that the patient didn’t know go inside of the patient’s body to operate without pre-warning the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    New York City College of Technology City University of New York Law and Ethics Case: Jeanette M. and the Phone Call Erica Rotstein October 7, 2017 Professor Bonsignore HAS 3560 -Legal Aspects of Health Care Abstract The advancement in the field of medicine over the years has led to doctors and health care providers having more responsibilities on their hands. This brings into question what should and shouldn’t be done, as well as what is morally and ethically right. However, this isn’t so cut and dry.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis Paper Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002) No 2001-CA-00117-SCT Jonathan R. Heshler California University of Pennsylvania NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the case of Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002). This civil case involved a female patient (Gwendolyn Wilkes) presenting to the emergency room at Boliver County Hospital, being misdiagnosed and discharged by Dr. Dorrough, dying the next day at another hospital after emergency surgery and the patients husband and son bringing a wrongful death medical malpractice action suit forth.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrea Smith Case Summary

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    She then shared the information with her husband, on the same day, her husband called the patient and reporting told the patient he intend to use the information against the patient in an upcoming legal proceeding. Smith doesn’t work the clinic anymore,…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Attorneys for Wilson Elser never presented one scintilla of evidence or information proving that MMC was a victim of abusive communication, false reporting or suffered irreparable harm. In fact, the record in this case includes evidence that Montefiore staff and agents have engaged in false swearing and testimony. In addition, the record proves that Montefiore Medical Center and its staff completed or caused to be completed a healthcare proxy by an elderly patient that is both completed and witnessed by only Montefiore staff. One of the staff members who signed the proxy as a witness is the doctor/healthcare provider who demanded the patient to receive a PICC line (catheter for intravenous delivery of drugs) for more than four weeks. During that time, the patient continued to deny additional surgical procedures by MMC, its staff or agents.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main issue for this case is whether or not Dr. Baugh and Dr. Feldman’s noncompete agreements with Colombia Heart were in fact enforceable. Originally, on the trial court level, they agreed with the doctors in their suit against Colombia Heart, stating that the noncompete provision was unenforceable, and their actions were admissable. Colombia Heart brought it up on appeals. The case was ultimately reversed in their favor, as on appeal they disagreed and found that the noncompete agreements were actually enforceable, and that the doctors were in the wrong, and that they were not able to go and practice on their own due to the agreements they had as shareholders. I find this to be really interesting actually.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The case of Brandt v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Sarah Bush Lincoln health center. This was a case where a patient Brenda Brandt was seen for a medical condition. While being treated for the condition the medical center she was implanted with a product that would be subsequently be recalled after her surgery. I was recall because it caused server medical complications with patients. Mrs. Brandt files a suit against the medical center and the manufacture Boston Scientific Corporation of the product which was implanted in her for a breach of warranty the Health center file a motion to have the case thrown out.…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jorge Soriano. The applicant testified he developed pain in the afternoon on the same day of the injury he testified he is only experiencing pain to the lower back and his neck. The applicant claimed he did request treatment and had communicated such request to the insurance carrier, but the response he received from the doctor as well as the carrier was they needed to focus on the treatment for the right shoulder before they could address the back and neck injury. I believe there may have been a miscommunication amongst the insurance carrier, the doctor and the applicant.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Moore V. Regents of the University of California In my opinion, John Moore should be the one to win the case. There are many reasons as to why I choose Moore over Dr. Golde. First of all, Dr. Golde has a very dishonest behavior. After Moore underwent surgery Golde falsely told him that he needed follow up treatment and further tests.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orr V. Bell Case Summary

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exceptional care and professional responsibility is a standard form of practice the general public rely upon for their health care needs. But, what happens when codes of conduct, rules and codes of ethics are violated and physicians fail to provide adequate care and diagnostics? When circumstance like this arise, who becomes responsible for the negligence on behalf of the patient? In the case of Orr vs. Bell, due to the negligence on behalf of Dr. Bell, the patient Orr went misdiagnosed and eventually became paralyzed. The review of this case will document and prove due to Dr. Bell’s failure to follow nationally recognized Radiologic ethics and rules Dr. Bell failed to determine Orr’s medical issue and therefore was responsible for the outcome…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Chanko Case Study

    • 1092 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Life is foundationally good on its own. In modern predominant religions, life has been viewed as intrinsically good and worth preserving. Medical professionals and caregivers’ primary objectives are to provide quality health care and protect patients’ interests. In the case of Mark Chanko, a man who had his death filmed and then shown for others’ entertainment, his caregivers did not hold up their end, and violated his rights to privacy by allowing the filming without his, nor his family’s consent. Charles Ornstein’s article raises questions on few special ethical rights being violated.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At this point the relationship that existed between doctor and patient has been stretched to non-existence. He mentions the importance of eye contact when dealing with patients and how impersonal it can feel when the doctor is focused on their computer or tablet, and not showing any interest of the patient. Another recent example of miscommunication in the doctor’s office was when Thomas Duncan came to a Texas hospital with a fever and other strange symptoms. The doctor who saw him didn’t look at his EHR, which had been recently changed by a nurse to say he had just returned from Liberia. If he had maybe he would have realized that Thomas Duncan was the first patient in the United States to have the Ebola virus.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lesson 4 Essay Medical Malpractice can be defined as the negligent or irresponsible medical treatment of a doctor, nurse or other medical practitioner that results in injury or death of a patient in their care (McMillen Law Firm, 2013). One of the unique qualities about Florida is its exercise of the ‘Three Strikes Law’. The relatively recent amendment to the Florida Constitution would automatically revoke the medical license of any doctor hit with three malpractice judgments which makes Florida one of the most hostile states for physicians. In my opinion, when it comes to protecting patients and physicians alike, there should be limitations set in place for each party.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The doctor’s intentions were right, he just wanted to help with his patient’s pain and…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Total Knee Arthroplasty My emotions were all over the place the night before preparing for the OR. I was worried about getting there on time, being able to find the OR, and most of all what surgery would I be observing. The morning of came very quickly and I was up and ready to go. When I first arrived to the OR tunnel my anxiety had come down a lot, and I seemed eager and ready to go.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neither patient was informed by the doctor that he was independent contractor nor he had any kind of identity on him that he was affiliated within independent anesthesiology group. During the surgery patient suffered brain damage, which led her to death. As plaintiff was not able to prove that physicians were independent contractor and was not working for the hospital. Patient was misled that he was one of the hospital…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays