What´s In Vitro Fertilization?

In Vitro Fertilization or IDF is a reproductive procedure that takes the egg from the fallopian tube. The procedure begins with the doctor stimulating the woman with the follicle stimulating hormones that allow the eggs to ovulate to the fallopian tube, at that moment, the doctors would take the eggs directly from there and insert it into a Petri Dish. Next, the ejaculated sperm, which will be used to fertilize the eggs is inserted into the eggs to form an embryo. Once the embryo is formed, the egg will be inserted into the placenta, where the embryo will hopefully develop into a fetus. However, if the woman fails to produce eggs due to any circumstances such as age that correlates with poor egg production, they will use an egg from another donor, or if …show more content…
There are also arguments in a utilitarian perspective that believe that IVF is morally permissible because it would help the relationship with marriage and etc… There are even beliefs that state is it morally impermissible to conduct this procedure because it disrespects human life because it goes against the religious views of how humans are supposed to be created. In this essay, I am to exposit the Congregation Doctrine of Faith that is heavily against In Vitro Fertilization because it goes against the natural law and a philosopher such as Peter Singer, who acknowledges the adverse effect of IVF but rebuts it, and the congregation doctrine of faith which is against In Vitro Fertilization. For this entire argument, I would consider Peter Singer’s argument to debunk the congregation doctrine of faith argument believing any form of In Vitro fertilization is impermissible. From there, I will articulate my arguments to why I would support Peter Singer’s argument and conclude in respect to the case of reproductive technology of why IVF is