What Were The Strengths Of The North Essay

Superior Essays
“I UNDERSTAND THE DEFINITION OF PLAGIARISM AND THE FOLLOWING IS MY ORIGINAL WORK.”
What was the “culture of slavery?” How did slaves attempt to define their own culture? Culture of slavery was basically just slaves figuring out how to make their own kind of culture. Some African culture was put into the slaves culture. The slaves all came from different parts of Africa so they were considered Blended. Slaves had their own type of music, it consisted of a very heavy rhythm. Some instruments they used was the drums and banjo; which was an African instrument. In New Orleans, the slaves had off on sundays because it was a religious area. When they had off the slaves would head to the Congo Square, they would sing, play their instruments, and dance.
…show more content…
What were the strengths of the North? The weaknesses? What advantages did the Confederacy have? Weaknesses? The North and Confederacy both had their strengths and weaknesses during the Civil War. The North had a huge navy and their trading ships were quick. The Norths rail lines were to transport food and troops. They had multiple factories to produce weapons and war supplies as well. Their population volunteered in the army and to work for their factories. The norths weaknesses were that they did not have many trained soldiers, they had to travel to places they did not know, it was a very far distance to supply the troops and send more troops. The Confederacy had their advantages and disadvantages as well. The Confederates fought on their own territory, so they knew all of the area. Their soldiers were all trained very well, better hunting skill and they attended military school. They also believed in the cause because it was for them, and their independence. A disadvantage of theirs was that they did not have many railroads to transport troops and give their troops supplies. They had a very small population, so not many people volunteered to join the army or help make the supplies for the war. They also did not have many factories to make their supplies and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At the the start of the war, 90% percent of factories were in the North, and the Northern forces had 20,000,000 eligible to volunteer compared to the 5,000,000 free volunteers in the South. The industrial revolution, amongst other things, brought heavy military advantage. One on which is the invention and use of the the railroad and train. The North used these railroads as an advantage, creating supply lines from the heart of the union to the battlefront. While the South was busy in the pre-war era maintaining agricultural and slave lifestyles, the North was building up it's industry to the point where by 1861, 71% of railroad mileage was in the North, and 91% of factory production was in the North.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Economy of the North and South was one of the major differences between the two sides. The North had smaller and lesser farms as it got more industrialized. The South had big plantations and a lot of farmers. Southerns depended on farming for their income. It was very…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The South losing the civil war was almost inevitable due to the fact that they had less of almost all resources, The confederates were out populated and the North had higher skilled leaders. Victory was nearly guaranteed for the North due to the Union having more resources. During the war the north had 120,000 factories while the south only had 21,000. With the greater amount of production they were able produce more weapons such as guns and cannons which contributed to the war effort.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In fighting the North, Rebels were forced to fight with the Union’s significantly favored army and navy, as well as their stronger, newer technology and industrial equipment. The South, consisting of fewer states, and less territory, naturally had a smaller population to work with. Additionally, seeing that a large majority of that population consisted of slaves, who were not permitted to fight in the Confederate forces, this population of those fit to fight shrunk even smaller. The CSA, or Confederate States of America, led by Jefferson Davis, brought more disadvantages upon themselves by not only banning these slaves from joining the military, but also forcing them to continue the production of cotton. In doing so, the slaves could not assist in military and wartime matters such as building forts or making ammunition.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to T. H. Williams, the North won the Civil war because they “brought forward generals who were able to grow” and would employ new ways of war. Although Civil war generals trained at West Point together and grew up in the same establishment, some were more successful than others hence Grant and Sherman having the ability to adapt. In the Civil war, there were only three important generals: Lee, Grant, and Sherman. They were great leaders since they were mentally tough and did not care much for casualties since they were big in numbers. The greatest among those three was Grant due to his common sense since it made “him able to rise above military dogma.”…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, the North had a bigger population. Due to their massive population more people volunteered to join the war. Another reason the North had won the Civil War was because of their massive industries. The more industries they had the more money they made. They also had a railroad system so they could made trades much more easier.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both the Union and the Confederacy had many different strategies and advantages in hopes that they could use them and win the Civil War. Abraham Lincoln would lead the Union and Jefferson Davis would act as the leader of the Confederacy. At the begging of the war, the Union was the favorite to win it all. The Union had many more weapons, soldiers, and resources than the Confederacy. The Union was also able to win the first battle of the war, the battle of Bull Run, which was another advantage for the fleet.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Near the beginning of the war, the Confederacy was fighting just to defend their position and therefore, fought defensively. As the war progressed, the confederacy changed to a more offensive strategy. When in battle the Confederacy tended to charge the enemy head on with a full frontal charge. The Confederacy as a nation did have the advantage of the defensive side in the war scenario.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons that the North won the Civil War was because blockade helped the North out. The Union had more men with which to fight and couldn’t afford to lose any men. This meant that not only was confederacy losing men to them being killed but, they also lost men to the prisons in two ways. The 1st one was that men become POWS (Prisoner Of War) and were not exchanged, so as to be likely to return to the battle line. The second one, was as prison guards.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The south had a small military force in which the north was able to overcome the force. The north had a bigger advantage is that the north had more industrial power in which they could produce more products to the military. Which was able to get ammo and their ammunition to the troops while they are fighting in the civil war. The north had more money as well which they were able to buy more supplies from their supplies and ship them to them to the troops. The north had also had more railroads which allowed them to be able to transport more troops, food, water, and supplies so they can keep the war in their favor.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In order to keep the four border slave states (Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland) from seceding and joining the Confederacy, Lincoln did not call for the abolition of slavery in those states because (1) the states would increase the Confederate population by over 50% and (2) the states gave the Union great strategic positioning for the Civil War (“Politics in the Civil War”). The North gained a considerable political advantage in the war with Lincoln leading a strong, centralized federal government capable of unifying the North. On the contrary, the South practiced the idea of states’ rights having more influence and power than the Confederate government. This sectionalism within the Confederacy prevented Jefferson Davis from increased executive power, causing a shortage of money and serious inflation issues. Meanwhile, the Union devised a strategic war strategy led by General Winfield Scott.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They looked at Caesar, Hannibal, Alexander, Turenne and Frederick the Great as examples of forces that were able to win despite the odds being stacked against them. (Military Leadership of North and South) However, they did not make the necessary sacrifices that it would have taken to win the war and did not have the brilliant leaders that had allowed Caesar and the others to win. The North did not have incredible military leaders either, but they were still more competent and experienced. One of the generals, Sherman, was positive that they had an advantage over the South with regard to who had the better leaders.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    North And South Essay

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The North had factors such as smaller and faster rivers, which provided more power to the cities, which greatly to contributed to their rapidly growing industries. The North couldn’t do some things that the South could, such as grow several different crops, but they could develop machinery that the South couldn’t. However, the South’s geography played a part in several different positives and negatives of the settles areas: land and weather made it easier to grow crops, harder to create more industrial products, such as machinery and currency, and the South was generally made up of plantations that cultivated common crops, which explains why slavery was so popular. Most slaves were illiterate, uneducated, and thanks to the slave-owners and racist citizens – ignorant. They couldn’t have done the work that was popular in the North, so they were assigned to busy work, growing and picking supplies for the South to use for trade and supplies.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The civil war was a devastating American war that pitted the north against the south, resulting in over 600,000 American casualties, making it the deadliest war in United States history. The war officially lasted from 1861-1865, but animosity between the Union north and Confederate south had been building up for decades leading to the war. The causes of the civil war are numerous and complex, but the four basic ideas behind it were their differing economies, slavery, states rights, and secession. The North and South’s economies were based on vastly different industries.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When comparing the North and South, there aren’t many similarities. Both believed the exact opposite on many different topics. These include topics of economics, social, military, and political ideas. At the end of the Civil War, the rural South and urban North were able to come together as a single and strong nation.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays