Sectional Crisis In The 19th Century

Great Essays
In the 19th century, the Senate was a focal point of the looming sectional crisis in the United States. In the Senate, where the Constitution established an equality of states, there was a delicate balance between North and South, slave and free states. Senators skillfully crafted legislation designed to resolve sectional conflicts and avoid secession. Through reasoned discourse, the Senate was able to pass key policies that helped the country prosper despite these rising tensions. This period between 1820 and 1850 is known as the Senate’s Golden Age. The beginning of the Golden Age of the Senate is most notably marked by the passage of the Missouri Compromise of 1820. The bill attempted to admit Missouri to the Union, for the second time. The main area of contention was the permission of slavery in the state. This caused rampant …show more content…
Minutes after legislative session ended for the day, he continued to sit and sign envelopes containing the printed speech. Representative Brooks accompanied by Congressmen Laurence Keitt and Henry Edmundson waited outside the chamber for it to empty. In Brooks’ hand was a gutta-percha cane with a gold head. He suffered from a limp, the scars of an earlier duel. Brooks confronted Sumner as he sat writing at his desk in the almost empty Senate chamber. "Mr. Sumner, I have read your speech twice over carefully. It is a libel on South Carolina, and Mr. Butler, who is a relative of mine.” As Sumner was about to stand, Brooks struck him with his cane. Sumner attempted to cover himself with his arms. Brooks began beating him as hard and as fast as he could. Sumner tried to get away, but was blinded from the blood streaming down his face. Brooks followed him and continued beating him with his cane, which broke as he did so. “I gave him about 30 first rate striped. Towards the last he bellowed like a calf. I wore my cane out completely but saved the head which is gold,” Brooks

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The article talks about the sectional crisis in North Carolina and surrounding southern states. It tries to summarize the overall resistance among white men of accepting blacks as their equals in both political and social contexts. “....that the great mass of the white people are being aggravated or forced in opposition by the election of negro delegates to the Conventions, the appointment of negroes to public offices, and the forcing of negroes on the Juries by military orders.” Even though the article proved wrong the belief that many southerners resented Reconstruction because of the dependence of slavery not only with the economic benefits of slaves but also their social dependents on slaves.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Copper Gauntlet HOOK: “No! You can’t go” ,Alastair lunged for Call, grabbing his arm. His Father wasn’t a big man, but he was lean and long and wiry. Call slipped and went down hard on the concrete, landing the wrong way on his leg. Pain shot up his body, making his vision swim.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The period in American history from 1820 to 1860 lead to a divided nation on the brink of a civil war. One thing dividing the nation of America between 1820 and 1860 was the rise of many different political parties and the issue of states’ rights. Each politician was working for he advancement of the same country, yet had wildly different beliefs. For example, Senator John C. Calhoun of SOuth Carolina said, “We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions,” when talking about slavery (Document A). While he was preaching the continuation with slavery, Democratic Congressman David Wilmot from Pennsylvania said, “The issue now presented is not whether slavery shall exist unmolested where it now is, but whether it shall be carried to new and distant regions, now free, where the footprint of a slave cannot be found” (Documented B).…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But serval members of congress from the north objected this. There were 11 slave’s states and 11 Free states. By adding Missouri there would be an increase in slave state and the power of southern states senate. The Missouri compromise was signed in to law 1820. The Missouri compromise had two main points; Missouri would be allowed slavery and Maine will be part of free state Which will balance the power of north and south.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tariff Dbq

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A few days later his nephew beat Sumner with his cane! A drawing was soon made, that accurately depicted the Southerners laughing who thought Sumner deserved the beating. (Document…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The period of 1850’s is called the decade of the secession crisis because it was a time where some of the most important and diversified events occurred in America. While the north believed that slavery was morally wrong the south didn’t agree with abolishing slavery, they believed that black people should provide free labor. The issue of slavery became a very important series of events starting with the compromise of 1850, then to the Kansas Nebraska act, and the Dred Scott case. The compromise was originally written by Henry Clay it was a set of laws that tried to change the territorial, and slavery dispute that started to arise in the Mexican American war.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the period of antebellum, the driving force between sectionalism in the north and south was slavery, or the ownership by whites of blacks who did their work for them and were treated like animals rather than humans. After the civil war, blacks were emancipated, or freed, and were also granted citizenship in the 14th Amendment. During the time in American history known as Reconstruction, the south was being rebuilt after the damage it took during the Civil War, and blacks were beginning to gain more legal rights and equalities that they were previously denied. Reconstruction came to an end because once African Americans were considered citizens and were no longer considered slaves people began to believe that the issue over blacks was done, so the white discrimination continued, only now legalized. After Reconstruction, the social status of African Americans fell back into the lowliness that it was before the Civil War broke out.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Had the reforms of the late 1800s and 1900s remained unchanged, various luxuries we experience today would not exist. While a considerable amount of the U.S population was for reforms, those in high statuses in either government or wealth did not see the need to create changes that could disturb their lives. Or make changes that they did not see significant because those with wealth did not experience all the struggles that were faced by the rest of the population. Major reform efforts of the late 19th and 20th century would consist of political reforms, women’s rights reforms, and labor reforms.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel Webster Defining his standing for his intent for the future of the Union with “Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!”, Daniel Webster spoke for what would become the Compromise of 1850 (Kennedy 59). A legislature that would preserve the peace between the northern free states and the southern slave states, Webster risked his reputation, political career and his followers support for preservation of the Union. He believed that the Union was more important than himself, and as such spoke for a controversial proposal that it needed. Leading up to 1850, a fragile balance was kept between the number of free states and the number of slave states in the Senate.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Compromise Of 1850

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (1) In the first place, the Compromise of 1850 was a bundle of five separate bills go by the United States Congress in September 1850, this defused a four-year political showdown amongst slave and free states with respect to the status of regions gained amid the Mexican-American War. Contention emerged over the Fugitive Slave arrangement. The Compromise was welcomed with alleviation, albeit every side loathed arrangement. The Compromise got to be conceivable after the sudden passing of President Taylor; even though he was a slave proprietor himself, he had favored barring servitude from the Southwest. Henry Clay planned a tradeoff, which neglected to go in the mid-1850, because of restriction by both star subjugation southern Democrats, drove…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alyssa Khoury Mr. Brennan APUSH 1/1/16 Sectionalism in the 1800s In the early 1800s, sectionalism between the North and the South was based on slavery. While the North completely disagreed with the idea of slavery, the South was all for the idea of slavery. As more time has passed, slavery became a greater issue. Throughout the United States of America, life for the slaves had slightly changed.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The period between 1800 and 1855 marked an era of expansion in American history including the Louisiana purchase, Mexican acquisition, California, Oregon, and development of the Midwest. This era, however, coexisted with a constant state of conflict and mixed feelings about slavery, reformation of society, and rapidly changing political stances. Most opposition and conflict was hinged at areas and topics the country had not decided to explore until then, including federalist opposition to the Louisiana purchase, northern support of the War of 1812, forced Indian removals of the 1830s, spirits of nationalism that extended to the West, and expansion of American values to areas including the Mexican Cession, Oregon, and Cuba. This divide between…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nationalism In The 1800s

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The 1800s saw the rise of nationalism throughout Europe and it led to the unification of the Italian and German states. Nationalism continues to play a role in European politics in the modern world and is one of the most important developments of the 1800s. Although nationalism played an important role in Europe in the 1800s, its definition varied and this variation would inspire different causes. The differences in the definition of nationalism given by Giuseppe Mazzini and Ernest Renan significantly impacted their respective countries of Italy and France in different ways. Mazzini and Renan exploited their definitions of nationalism to achieve specific goals.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of slavery has long been viewed as the primary cause of the American Civil War. However, slavery is only a portion of the conflict that caused the Civil War. The four developments that contributed to the Civil War were the sectional dispute over the extension of slavery into the western territories, the breakdown of the political party system, the growing cultural differences in the views and lifestyles of southerners and northerners and the intensifying emotional and ideological polarization between the regions over losing their way of life and sacred republican rights at the hands of the other. Slavery was not the only issue culminating in the Civil War but is widely accepted, though superficial. Territorial expansion in the…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This passage addresses this theme by first offering a vivid depiction of the beating and then explaining how it made Douglass feel and the long-term effect that it had on Frederick Douglass. Douglass writes that that watching the slave master beat his aunt struck him with an awful force and that he was not able to write down the full extent of what happened. Some might argue that Douglass’ situation might be unique and that all slavery was not as violent as what Douglass witnessed. Or someone could argue that Douglass exaggerated his description of slavery to engage the reader of his book more. Another point could be that slave owners did not beat their slaves to instill fear but just to punish one slave.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays