Ethnic Cleansing In Yugoslavia

Superior Essays
Ethnic cleansing is when there are many different ethnicities in a region and the majority attempt to eradicate the other ethnic groups. In the eyes of the majority, ethnic cleansing was used as a tool to “purify” the country by getting rid of the minority to establish ethnic homogeneity (“Ethnic Cleansing”). The term ethnic cleansing was first introduced during the conflict between the Serbians and the other ethnicities of Yugoslavia. The Bosnian genocide is a product of the extreme nationalism expressed by the Serbians and Solbodan Milosevic’s prejudice towards the muslims of Yugoslavia. This eventually led to the mass murder of 7,000 Muslim men in Srebrenica and is considered one of the greatest atrocities committed during this genocide …show more content…
The leaders of the European countries, despite being covered by the news, did not grasp the fact that while they were unable to come to terms with what ethnic cleansing is, innocent people were getting slaughtered just because they are a certain ethnicity. Since the leaders of Europe were not willing to recognize ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia as a pressing matter, the UN treated it similarly. Their soldiers sent to Yugoslavia were given orders not to do anything drastic or to spark anything with the Serbs but because of this, they were ineffective in protecting the Muslims and many were executed by Serbian forces (Nordland). Finally in 1994, NATO was spurred into action after it became apparent that the Serbs “refused to concede any territory” (“Bosnian Conflict”) despite the fact that they controlled 70% of Bosnian land. The UN and Europe changed their stance after what happened in …show more content…
Their effectiveness decreased over the period of the genocide due to internal Croat conflicts in 1993-1994 and an internal arms embargo (“Bosnian Conflict”). What ended up strengthening their forces was caused by the Croats and the Muslims agreeing to form a joint government. Once Milosevic cut military funding, the chances of their defeat increased. In 1994, the Serbs were forced to agree to participate in peace talks after they were not able to withstand combined NATO, Muslim and Croat attack (“War and Ethnic”). The Dayton Peace Agreement was signed by Serbs, Muslims, and Croats of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1995. It recognized Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina as separate countries, indicted Milosevic with multiple war crimes (learn.education2020.com/student), assigned 51 % of the land to the people under the joint Croat and Muslim government, assigned the rest of the land to go to the Serbs and. Because of this genocide, 100,000 people were killed and 2,000,000 were displaced (“Bosnian

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Legalist Paradigm Analysis

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    March 23, 1999 marked the beginning of the NATO bombing campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia lasting three months. The rationale for the campaign was on the basis of “humanitarian intervention.” It was said to be in prevention of the ethnic cleansing of the Kosovar Albanians of Siberia by the authoritative regime of Slobodan Milosevic. The moral justification of this conflict has since been contested with the validity debated by a variety of theoretical schools of thought. This essay will use the revisions to the Legalist Paradigm presented by Walzer in conjunction with the conditions of jus ad bellum to prove the moral impermissibility of NATOs intervention in Kosovo.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote is from a Serbian soldier speaking about the plans against the Bosnian Muslim captives he guarded (Yancey). To begin, “genocide” is seen differently by everyone involved and has specific steps. In Bosnia, conflicting views created tension amongst its citizens The eight stages of genocide pertain to the conflict in Bosnia. Finally, genocide is a horrific event that needs intervention on a global scale. As a result of the Serbians’ beliefs that the Muslims were unworthy of residing in their country, atrocious tactics were used in order…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the past hundred of years many genocide atrocities have occurred, taking a toll on human lives, and influencing the history of countries worldwide. The Armenian Genocide and Cambodian Genocide occurred at two very different times, but there are connections between the two that make them comparable. The Armenian Genocide beginning on April 24, 1915 was under the rule of the Young Turks, who wanted to to turkify the Ottoman Empire, by ridding it of any Non- Turks, especially those of whom were Christian. During the seven years of this destructive genocide nearly one point five million Armenians were dead or removed from the country, yet the Turkish government today does not acknowledge the genocide happening. Along with the Armenian Genocide,…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many countries around the world have experienced turmoil and hardships. Whether it be terrorism, disease, or government. Cambodia and Europe experienced what is called a “genocide.” Many of their people were killed and tortured for religion, way of life, and/or ethnicity. Although the Holocaust and the Cambodian genocide bear pronounced similarities, the differences are just as striking.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Armenian Genocide " Who, after all, speaks of the annihilation of the Armenians?" Hitler once said this when addressing the Nazi army about the upcoming genocide of millions of Jews. A genocide is the systematic killing of a group of people based on religion, race, or culture. Genocides are crucial to our past, as well as crucial to our future.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘The Banality of “Ethnic War”’ aims to debate the all against all theory of ethnic conflict. Within this piece, Mueller argues that ethnic war, in the sense of the Hobbesian theory, does not exist, and this generalized theory represents non-ethnic conflict (p.42). Mueller’s article provided several strengths, which makes the piece of literature a thorough yet interesting analysis of ethnic conflict. Mueller uses the cases of Yugoslavia and Rwanda to explore how ethnicity mobilizing device, played a role in the construction of the appropriate conditions, needed to conduct this particular form of violence (p.43). First, Mueller highlights another perspective by another analyst, Robert Kaplan.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Holocaust and Bosnian Genocides: a comparison Genocide: from the Greek word “Genos” meaning race, and English “-cide” denoting the act of killing. The systematic mass destruction of a race, of a culture, of a religion, of ideas and ideologies, of precious human life; and they have been going on for a long time. Though most people typically don’t ever hear about it until we talk about the Holocaust, it was not the first one, nor the last. Even after one of the most prolific mass killings of a race of people, genocide has happened many times after, and Genocide is even happening today. From the 1930’s, fast forward to the 1990’s, from the Holocaust in Germany to Bosnia and beyond.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Genocide In Serbia

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia came as a shock to many around the world. Thousands of people were slaughtered not only by the Serbian government, but also by their neighbors and former friends. Although a tragedy the genocide was not much of a surprise looking at the history of the region. Tensions had been running high between the Serbs, Croats, Bosnians and Ethnic Albanians. The reason for the Genocide was similar to many before it; kill the unwanted minority in order to create a pure race and space for that race to exist.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the span of two years, 1.2 million Armenians were murdered by the Turks (“The Armenian Genocide (1915-16): In Depth”). The elimination of the Armenians could be blamed mostly on the Turks because of the lack of trust from the Turks towards the Armenians during World War Ι. This is known as the Armenian Genocide, although Turkey refuses to consider it a genocide to this day. Since all the stages of genocide are completely evident in history, as well as the murder of millions of people, this event should be considered a genocide by Turkey and the rest of the world.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Back in 1994, Rwanda faced its darker period of time in its history. A horrifying and historical genocide took place over three months on Rwandan soil. The horror and brutality of that act has been compared to what happened in Nazi Germany over World War II. About one million Rwandan people got literally exterminated by their countrymen because of their ethnic group given by Belgian colonizers over occupation (1916-1962). Nevertheless, that tragedy could have been lower and prevented if some countries would have intervened and did not think to their own interests first.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The word Genocide means killing or destroying members of an ethic group because of their race, nationality or religion. It is one of the worst crimes that people ever came across when thousands and millions of people were murdered. From 1992-1995 that was happening in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Bosnia is a country in south-eastern Europe that emerged after the break-up of Yugoslavia in 1980. The conflict between the three main ethnic groups in Bosnia, the Serbs, Croats, and Muslims, resulted in genocide committed by the Serbs against the Muslims in this…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War often carries enormous human costs, but we recognize that the imperative of stopping or preventing genocide or other systematic slaughter can sometimes justify the use of military force. For that reason, Human Rights Watch has on rare occasion advocated humanitarian intervention—for example, to stop ongoing genocide in Rwanda and Bosnia. Understood as a humanitarian intervention, our purpose is not to say whether the U.S.-led coalition should have gone to war for other reasons. That, as noted, involves judgments beyond our mandate.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They enforced mass executions, concentration camps, rape and sexual violence, and they forced other ethnic groups to run. Unfortunately, the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization did not oppose the Serbians until 1995 – about three years into the war. One of the largest atrocities in the Yugoslavic War was in the town of Srebrenica where a four day massacre occurred in and around the city. Up to 8,000 Bosniak men and teenage boys had been killed, and many women were subject to torture, rape, and violence. Although the UN was hesitant to directly fight the Bosnian Serbs for the fear of losing their neutrality, they eventually stepped in.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cambodian Genocide and Holocaust: Comparison and Contrast The intentional killing of a large group of people, typically due to ethnicity, race or religion is known as genocide. In the Holocaust and Cambodian Genocide, many innocent people were murdered in hopes of a “perfect population”. The Holocaust began in 1933 in Germany when Adolf Hitler rose to power. Hitler and members of the National Socialist German Workers Party committed the massacre of genocide.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is a genocide- "a deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. " What is a holocaust- "a destruction or slaughter on a mass scale." Within this paper I will be comparing how these two horrific events are alike and different. The Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust were similar to each other with the same leadership that was hungry for power and control, both aggressors wanted full authority of their countries and one pure race, and the vicious treatment and manner of extermination towards the innocent people was the same. First of all, the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust were similar to each other with the same leadership that was hungry for power and control.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays