After analyzing the two given sources, A and B, my justification of their credibility has been established. Based on Source A “Understanding Your Fiber Needs”, from the Fiber Farms Cereal Company’s website, there is a high daily fiber requirement that can be hard to obtain. This may have good information, but it can exaggerate and present bias in its thesis because it's being supported by a cereal company that is advertising for a fiber drink. In order to boost your buyers it makes sense that a company would amplify facts to sound more beneficial and nutritious, thus persuading viewers. Therefore, though it does provide information about the role fiber plays in digestion the information in this advertisement is not the cite you should use for a research report.
…show more content…
Professional medical practitioners are certainly a primary source with first hand experience when it comes to the knowledge of different nutrients and your body function. This source is unbiased because a medical practitioner would only want to relay facts and assist in keeping people well. As a final attribute this article is packed with good information that could be quoted. In conclusion if you were to write an essay on, “What Role Dietary Fiber Play in Good Health?” you most advantageous text to cite would be source B if you want dependable
Professional medical practitioners are certainly a primary source with first hand experience when it comes to the knowledge of different nutrients and your body function. This source is unbiased because a medical practitioner would only want to relay facts and assist in keeping people well. As a final attribute this article is packed with good information that could be quoted. In conclusion if you were to write an essay on, “What Role Dietary Fiber Play in Good Health?” you most advantageous text to cite would be source B if you want dependable