This is a tricky question. Considering all of this issues that have arisen with patented GMO seeds, like world hunger issues that could be solved without restrictions and the complications that come with GMO's, my initial answer was no, companies shouldn't have a right. However, just because certain companies have dominated the game of seed manufacturing, and farming in general, does not mean that this is "illegal". Ethically I don't know where I stand because technically they aren't doing anything wrong. They are indirectly causing world hunger and hurting people and farmers, and the global economy for that matter. Inner me, my soul, says this is wrong. The sad, logical side of me says that technically these companies can do this and it would
…show more content…
There are limited resources. Some people have such a disproportionate amount that they are utilizing while others have nothing. In order for all resources to be allocated for everyone to have a even share those who have more should give to those who have less. In order for world hunger to end, underdeveloped countries need to be lifted out of poverty. A logical person would say that it comes down to politics and it would be a waste to help underdeveloped countries because it would end up doing more harm to developed countries than providing help to underdeveloped countries. These are real people who are starving. Shouldn't that be enough to change someone's mind. Poverty isn't a choice, it is a circumstance that can be prevented. The U.S. throws out so much food.We have a surplus, it just isn't allocated correctly. There are solution to hunger.
The U.S. definitely has a hunger problem. Hunger is a huge problem in the U.S. one major reason is that there is a large divide between socioeconomic classes in the U.S. There are so many people in the U.S. that make a sizable income and have a surplus. There are many people who live in absolute poverty. In order for there to be a surplus, someone must be lacking. Fundamentally to solve the issues of hunger in America it should start at the root of this issue in providing more jobs and opportunities for growth in low income areas as well as food assistance programs for life's
There are limited resources. Some people have such a disproportionate amount that they are utilizing while others have nothing. In order for all resources to be allocated for everyone to have a even share those who have more should give to those who have less. In order for world hunger to end, underdeveloped countries need to be lifted out of poverty. A logical person would say that it comes down to politics and it would be a waste to help underdeveloped countries because it would end up doing more harm to developed countries than providing help to underdeveloped countries. These are real people who are starving. Shouldn't that be enough to change someone's mind. Poverty isn't a choice, it is a circumstance that can be prevented. The U.S. throws out so much food.We have a surplus, it just isn't allocated correctly. There are solution to hunger.
The U.S. definitely has a hunger problem. Hunger is a huge problem in the U.S. one major reason is that there is a large divide between socioeconomic classes in the U.S. There are so many people in the U.S. that make a sizable income and have a surplus. There are many people who live in absolute poverty. In order for there to be a surplus, someone must be lacking. Fundamentally to solve the issues of hunger in America it should start at the root of this issue in providing more jobs and opportunities for growth in low income areas as well as food assistance programs for life's