What Is Thrasymachus A Tyrant

Decent Essays
thrasymachus uses the example of a tyrant by showing how they make laws in their best interest and the weak must be obedient to all of the laws or they will be punished. Thrasymachus goes on to explain that most people are good in appearance because they are afraid of the punishment. The more intelligent and strong will disobey the laws and have the courage to wrong others causing the weak to suffer. Believing that the unjust life is better, Thrasymachus says the unjust man can easily benefit himself by not paying his taxes and steal from the weak. Thrasymachus claims that of one steals it will be big to aid himself. Thus Thrasymachus concludes that a tyrant’s life is good and it is best to have the most power.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For years there has been questions whether revenge is ever justifiable. Some individual’s believe that revenge, or punishment in the form of an eye for an eye, is justice served. However, plays such as “The Furies” written by Aeschylus, portray the belief that revenge is unjustifiable. The series of revenge in Agamemnon’s family depicts that revenge is unjustifiable because it holds everyone involved accountable. Revenge seems to force individuals to act unjust and causes them to ignore the motivations and circumstances of those who commit…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Thrasymachus ‘Justice is the advantage of the stronger’. What does he mean by this and does Socrates succeed in proving him wrong? The name Thrasymachus means fierce fighter, and this certainly represents the character of the same name, who appears in book one of Plato’s Republic. Thrasymachus enters Plato’s world with a statement designed to shock, stating that “justice is the advantage of the stronger”.…

    • 2199 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power In Oedipus The King

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Power is what every man, woman, and eventually child crave, and kill for. Sophocles was aware of this, for all three of his plays demonstrate the lengths one would go to for even the smallest taste of the possibilities power can grant you. One can infer Sophocles viewed the society he was a part of as cruel, whether you were selfish or selfless, life, in general, was selfish because in the end those who were innocent met their demise by those who were responsible for their own. It was interesting that in both Oedipus Rex and Oedipus at Colonus men appear to be the most dominant sex while in Antigone the roles switch. Sophocles depicts Antigone as a rebel, a challenger to Creon's power, one who fights for what she believes in and dies to try to fulfill that belief.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Thrasymachus’ Conception on Justice In Friedrich Nietzsche’s work, The Genealogy of Morality, he states that the existence of laws establishes what is just and unjust within a given society (Nietzsche 1280; sec 12). Thus, there does not seem to be anything explicitly virtuous for justice. In reference to the Republic, I will argue Socrates and Thrasymachus have different views on justice and will ultimately disagree with each other on Nietzsche 's conception of justice. Nietzsche’s entire work is trying to dissect morality from its origins.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Gorgias, Socrates argues against Polus an ancient Greek orator, that tyrants and orators do not, in fact do what they want, instead they do what they see fit. As a result of this claim, Socrates believes tyrants and orators have the least power in their cities. This paper will primarily argue Socrates’s views through the definition of power, who holds the “real” power, that some things are inherently bad, and that there are different views of morality. The argument that Socrates sets forth states “If a person does whatever he sees most fit to do when he lacks intelligence, is this still ‘having power?’”…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kallipolis is a perfectly structured society in which justice is achieved at the social and interpersonal realms. It is ruled by a philosopher king, who maintain the peace and harmony in the ideal society. According to Plato in The Republic, the philosopher king possesses the qualities to be the rightful king to rule in Kallipolis. Philosophers are qualified to rule because they have a understanding of the Forms or the truth, their wisdom allows them to understand justice and their knowledge makes them superior than others. However, a philosopher can be a tyrant in disguise.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He means anything that a ruler thinks is good is justice. Rulers proceed ruling power to control and make laws for their cities; hence, what rulers think is just for people under their authority is justice. Therefore, if a person disobey any law he receives punishment for acting unjustly. Then Socrates shows humans are fallible, liable to make mistakes, and so are the rulers. Thrasymachus claims that a ruler to the extent he is a ruler does not make mistakes, so the ruler decides what is good for him and the subjects should carry out his order.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The switch to the discussion of profitability changes the scale in which justice is analyzed from justice as an overarching concept to an individual in action. From his view, justice has a key role in society but for an individual it is more profitable to be unjust. As a moral skeptic, Thrasymachus doesn’t believe justice to hold an intrinsic good. For an…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposing view of justice in the podcast and Plato’s Republic is given by Thrasymachus, who claimed justice belonged to those with power as they have the strength to break the rules, exploiting the weaker. Breaking the law is more just than…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Athens, the old-fashioned and traditional way of life is what one would consider the proper and just speech. Contrary, unjust speech is not accepted in the court of law because it does not appeal to the gods. Unjust speech is seen as boosting self-indulgence and is seen as a threat to the city (Clouds, pg.151). Throughout Aristophanes’ Clouds there is a battle between what is new and old, just and unjust. This is clear in Clouds, considering that Pheidippides would be considered “New”, overturns the old, which would be considered “Strepsiades”.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Why should we moral , according to Glaucon? Do you agree or disagree? Explain why?…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Plato’s ‘Republic’, happiness and justice are deeply questioned and analyzed as being interconnected. The broadest assumption of a happy person is one who is most wealthy and with very much power. This is almost an unspoken truth, however, does it really work out? One of the most famous Greek philosophers was Socrates, a son of a stonemason who encouraged discussion among many elite, powerful men. In the Republic written by Plato, the idea of a happy person is dissected thoroughly by Socrates and explained.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, the images of justice are perceived differently between several characters in this novel. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, all present contrasting ideals of justice compared to the one envisioned by Socrates. Using the art of rhetoric, Socrates utilizes argumentation to identify the faults in each individual’s vision of justice, and how his unconventional perception of justices can change their entire society. The first vision of justice discussed in The Republic was Cephalus. Cephalus describes justice as honesty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays