What Is The Unethical Nature Of Mr. Camp's Behavior

Mr. Camp is what you would expect of a worst-case lawyer involved in family law. His guiding principle seems to be one of scorched earth tactics that will extend the process (and increases his fees) as long as possible. Children are simply props to be used against the father and in the short term interest of his client, typically the mother. In the end, Mr. Camp takes home an exorbitant fee and destroys families. The unethical nature of Mr. Camp’s behavior knows no bounds and is in no way encumbered or restrained by the completely futile Georgia Bar Association that enables and supports him. You can look at my case and quickly determine that perjury was Camp’s fundamental strategy and that in winning short-term gains by use the strategy would do nothing but perpetuate the …show more content…
Camp. This abuse of the justice system pales in comparison to the adverse lifetime effect upon my daughters that Mr. Camp has caused. It has gotten quite personal between Mr. Camp and me. I believe most fathers typically rollover and surrender when confronted by Mr. Camp’s tactics. Although my complaints have been ineffective thus far, due to the complicit Georgia Bar Association, Mr. Camp has still appears to be outraged that I as a father would even think the question the appropriateness of the legal situation he has arranged between himself, Ms. Beth Anne Grant and the Houston County Court. I have filed three complaints with the Georgia Bar Association, but as to be expected, an organization of lawyers that polices the action of other lawyers is destined to be ineffective. I believe the greatest damage Mr. Camp has caused has actually been done to his own client who in the short-term believes she has benefited from his actions, but in the long-run will realize has willingly and deliberately destroyed the relationships with her daughters or anyone else who knows the facts of the