What Is The Theme Of The Man He Killed By Williams Hardy

Good Essays
In war, there are no boundaries and only one goal-- to win. The methods people employ to get their side an advantage are ruthless because they are fighting for something that they strongly believe in. That being said, they will do anything they can to get their message across. In the novel Dawn by Elie Wiesel, the main character, Elisha, is faced with a dilemma: whether or not to kill a man in order to help his cause. In the poem “The Man He Killed” by Thomas Hardy also explores a man’s thoughts after killing an enemy. Both of these works demonstrate the concept that one’s beliefs in a greater good can cause one to compromise their morals when facing an enemy. This notion is shown through the authors use of both external and internal …show more content…
This poem describes a man and his thought process after killing someone. The poem takes place during a battle in war. He describes the opposing side as “ranged as infantry,/ And staring face to face” (Hardy). This describes how the man that he killed was definitely on the opposing party and therefore his enemy. The author later goes on to say, “I shot at him as he at me” (Hardy). Both of these men were just trying to kill each other because of the war going on; both of the men believe in their causes enough to be take someone else's life or have theirs taken from them. The narrator “shot him dead because —/ Because he was [the narrator's] foe” (Hardy). It is highly evident throughout the poem that the only reason that he is committing the heinous act is because he is at war and he must do this in order for his side to …show more content…
After killing the man, the narrator thinks about the man was probably a regular, everyday fellow. The narrator wonders, “Had he and I but met/ By some old ancient inn,/ We should have sat us down to wet/ Right many a nipperkin!” (Hardy). He believes that if the circumstances were different they may have been friends. This makes it even harder for him to have done what he did because he know how wrong it was even though he had to due to the war. The narrator thinks about the man and how the man got involved in the war, “He thought he'd 'list, perhaps,/ Off-hand like — just as I — /Was out of work — had sold his traps — / No other reason why “ (Hardy). During this, the narrator find similarities between the man and himself. He realizes that the man he had just killed was in the war for the same reason as himself. As human nature goes, it becomes increasingly difficult to harm someone that is similar to yourself because your brain sees it as hurting yourself. By recognizing their similarities, he sees the innocence in the man. Even through this thought process, the grueling duties of war take over and become the leading motivator when taking

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    “[Edgar Allen Poe] often worked out his revenge on those he detested in his writing” (mystery). He created a cold-hearted man in his short story who is willing to kill his friend without a reason. In this short story, he had a major influence by his life and how he wanted to take revenge against someone but knew was impossible to do in real life. “When he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge,” Montresor has planned to kill Fortunato who have been friends for a while (Poe 1108). Montresor killing his friend with no reason was how Edgar Allen Poe took his revenge out on those who victimized him through his writing.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The translator stays by the stair case crying however, after the Germans surrender he rounds up the prisoners and once he recognizes the man who he let go he kills him without a second thought. This is a sharp transition from the boy who would not execute a prisoner of war in the start of the war. It presents a development that war drastically changes soldiers making it almost impossible to remain who you were surrounded by pain and death. The translator was an idealist trying to do the right thing like Witt in The Thin Red Line. Sergeant Welsh saw him as an idealistic boy who does not belong in the army and he feared that the war would kill him because of his idealism and in the end Welsh buried his body.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Other players, like Hamlet and Claudius, are considered ambiguous as well, but they’re abiguity contributes to the moral theme in a different way. Laertes showed the audience that, having good intentions can be corrupted by the actions taken for pride and honor. For example, he forgives Hamlet for killing his father, but continues to fight him for his family’s honor. As he was about to kill Hamlet, he felt a drop of remorse, and proceeded to kill him saying . .…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The next stanza says,” but ranged as infantry, and staring face to face, I shot at him as he at me, and killed him in his place”. The tone starts to change dramatically to a more serious tone although the meaning stays the same throughout the poem. The speaker finally tells where he and the man met. “Ranged as infantry,” means that the two men were in war with each other. Then the poem says they were standing face to face.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the sniper’s story, he goes from a process of dehumanization to humanization, while Paul eventually starts to slowly dehumanize himself from war. Dehumanization as a result of war is inherently ironic, which is demonstrated with these two dynamic characters: the sniper dehumanizing himself so he wouldn’t feel guilt over killing others leads to him killing someone he very much cares about, and Paul trying to dehumanize himself so as to cope with Billy Boy’s death results in near…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They made him scared that if Marius dies he may never see him, again, they made him come to his sense about arguing over political views. The crisis of conscience is that Javert begins to think if it is a good idea to arrest Valjean. Javert is a man of the law but since Javert saved at the barricades he realized that Valjean is a man who full of kindness and goodness to everyone even those who aren't kind to him. This is similar to Valjeans The ultimate outcome is that Javert winds up committing suicide. Rebirth: M. Gillenormand changed by he became accepting to what Marius wished or wanted, he became a lot nicer in the way he approached people or…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It also shows the psychological effects that the war had on each character. Tim O’Brien is the writer of this book but he is also the protagonist of this novel. O’Brien describes a man he killed in My Khe with a deep, detailed description. He does this due to a natural human instinct to make connections to the stranger he had killed. Soldiers are expected to just aim and shoot, but humans are not machines, they have emotions and want to make emotional connections to their surroundings (Ford).…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the poem, The Man He Killed, the soldier shows uncertainty saying, “I shot him dead because-/Because he was my foe./ Just so: my foe of course he was;/ That’s clear enough; although”(Hardy, 5-8). With the soldier’s lengthy pause in his statement, the reader can obviously tell that the soldier has no clue as to why he had to kill another. The soldier says this line almost ‘matter of factly’ but without any reason behind his actions. Upon even further analysis of, The Man He Killed, the reader comes to the conclusion the “The Man” (in the title) that was killed was actually the same person who “He” killed; forever taking away this poor soldier’s personality and emotions. Similarly to The Man He Killed, O’Brien’s, “The Things They Carried” focuses on confusion within the platoon.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Here, Waits, is describing how soldiers are sent out to war, but the people that are responsible for the war should be fighting it themselves, instead are sitting behind a desk enjoying their lives while leading the lives of thousands of men to their death. This ties to what Owen was saying, that the people responsible for the war, give soldiers false truths about fighting a war. Harvey proposed a great question, “What if I take my problem to the United Nations?” Harvey proposed this question, because many soldiers are left scarred from the war, and are thrown back into society without the help that is needed. The people that are responsible for the war are not scarred, because as waits stated they are behind a desk telling the lie that Owens states and the soldiers who are young and naive believe this lie and the men behind the desk, and go to fight the…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The author is trying to portray that the war is at fault for his brothers death, some may say that it is just a simple accident. On the contrary, this “simple accident” would not have happened if it wasn’t for one curse...the war. These two examples of literature have come to show…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays